Florida bans all pipes and bongs, Starting July 1st., ? ass Rick Scott
Options
Comments
-
@sixsicksins you are the best woman on this forum. I absolutely adore you.
-
tha_bride22 wrote: »Who takes bongs and pipes outside of the home anyways?
Plus its alot less expensive to make your own. I got on YouTube and made a ? out of a grey goose bottle. Took me 1 hour.
eggzactly. just get you a ? or pipe and blow in the crib like you used to and dont take it beyond the porch. problem solved
-
SixSickSins wrote: »BlackxChild wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »Mr. Whatchasay wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »This is wonderful news. Smoker's "smoking rights" must be disenfranchised. I hope each perpetrator of this lovely law is caught in violation 2+ times and pinned with a felony. I am smiling for everyone in FL today since they will be breathing easier. This has inspired me to write a suggestive letter to my own congressmen in the hopes that they follow suit with this HOS (Hard On Smokers) greatness. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The Black Creator has blessed us all.
simmer down lil one, weed smoke doesnt cause lung cancer or any other respiratory problems, never affected anyone by 2nd hand smoke
U cant fight the fight for blacks but turn around and discriminate against another group, you wylin lil one
Just because I uplift one group doesn't mean I can't discriminate against another. I discriminate against crakkkas daily. Keep thinking it "seemingly" doesn't hurt you. "But no one has died..it's clearly the safer alternative to tobacco!!!1!".
No. This law is lovely and I revel in its glory.
Statistics show that you are less likely to have cancer if you smoke weed. I don't show that I'm stressed at all but when I am I get patches in my hair (most ppl dont notice) the only way it goes away is if I smoke weed.
"Statistics" also state that you're a ? . What's a lil cancer to a balding ? ?
You should probably learn to manage your stress in different methods in order to make an informed decision on "the only way it goes away".
The thang yall n00bs fail to realize about "statistics" is that they're so malleable to whims, it's not even funny. I can conjure up a statistic to proclaim anything I want it to say if I utilize the right population of folks.
I can statistically prove ? is real... if I assess the correct population of folks.
Remedial maff muhfuckas. Flawda doing something right for once and you all want to complain. Pity.
You have anger issues, maybe you should smoke some green. I'm not going bald by the way and the only person whose a ? is you. You're a crazy ? . -
I laugh in FL's general direction. -
ineedpussy wrote: »DaCaliKing wrote: »how we gonna have two states that legalized weed
n mfs still goin to jail for a dime sack the next state over
that ? don't even make sense to me
cops here in ky are bad off that ? ..find u a with a dime sack n swear on everything that u a kingpin or cold blooded murderer or sum ?
its 2013 this ? has got to END
@DaCaliKing
? you aint in no damn ky. hell most of the time they catch you with a dime bag theyll either take it and tell you to gtfoh depending how you came at em. or they will just give you a citation. and who the ? gets dime bags? thats so 96
yea u clearly must know where i'm at
dumb ? smfh
dime sack was an example of how these pigs trip over a lil bit of nothin.
-
ineedpussy wrote: »tha_bride22 wrote: »Who takes bongs and pipes outside of the home anyways?
Plus its alot less expensive to make your own. I got on YouTube and made a ? out of a grey goose bottle. Took me 1 hour.
eggzactly. just get you a ? or pipe and blow in the crib like you used to and dont take it beyond the porch. problem solved
DEAD @ the bolded
? couldn't spell a 7 letter word.
-
BlackxChild wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »BlackxChild wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »Mr. Whatchasay wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »This is wonderful news. Smoker's "smoking rights" must be disenfranchised. I hope each perpetrator of this lovely law is caught in violation 2+ times and pinned with a felony. I am smiling for everyone in FL today since they will be breathing easier. This has inspired me to write a suggestive letter to my own congressmen in the hopes that they follow suit with this HOS (Hard On Smokers) greatness. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The Black Creator has blessed us all.
simmer down lil one, weed smoke doesnt cause lung cancer or any other respiratory problems, never affected anyone by 2nd hand smoke
U cant fight the fight for blacks but turn around and discriminate against another group, you wylin lil one
Just because I uplift one group doesn't mean I can't discriminate against another. I discriminate against crakkkas daily. Keep thinking it "seemingly" doesn't hurt you. "But no one has died..it's clearly the safer alternative to tobacco!!!1!".
No. This law is lovely and I revel in its glory.
Statistics show that you are less likely to have cancer if you smoke weed. I don't show that I'm stressed at all but when I am I get patches in my hair (most ppl dont notice) the only way it goes away is if I smoke weed.
"Statistics" also state that you're a ? . What's a lil cancer to a balding ? ?
You should probably learn to manage your stress in different methods in order to make an informed decision on "the only way it goes away".
The thang yall n00bs fail to realize about "statistics" is that they're so malleable to whims, it's not even funny. I can conjure up a statistic to proclaim anything I want it to say if I utilize the right population of folks.
I can statistically prove ? is real... if I assess the correct population of folks.
Remedial maff muhfuckas. Flawda doing something right for once and you all want to complain. Pity.
You have anger issues, maybe you should smoke some green. I'm not going bald by the way and the only person whose a ? is you. You're a crazy ? .
Here is my "statistic". You should believe it since you blindly believe other ones:
Question: Does Smoking Marijuana Cause Lung Cancer?
Answer:
The link between smoking tobacco and lung cancer is undeniable, but does smoking marijuana cause lung cancer, too? The short answer -- probably.
In 2006, many of us in medicine were shocked when a review of research to date did not show an increase in lung cancer related to marijuana use. There was even a suggestion that marijuana had a protective effect against lung cancer. More recent studies, in contrast, do appear to link smoking marijuana with lung cancer.
One study demonstrated a doubling in lung cancer for male marijuana smokers who also used tobacco (i.e. for men who smoked the same amount, the risk of lung cancer was twice as high for men who also used marijuana.) Another study found that long-term use of marijuana increased the risk of lung cancer in young adults (55 and under), with the risk increasing in proportion to the amount of marijuana smoked.
Why the controversy?
Since marijuana is illegal, it is hard to do the controlled studies that have been done with tobacco. Because of this, it helps to look at what we do know about marijuana:
Many of the carcinogens and co-carcinogens present in tobacco smoke are also present in smoke from marijuana.
Marijuana smoking does cause inflammation and cell damage, and it has been associated with pre-cancerous changes in lung tissue.
Marijuana has been shown to cause immune system dysfunction, possibly predisposing individuals to cancer.
Bottom line: Though marijuana most likely pales in cancer risk when compared to cigarette smoking, it's better to play it safe. There are reasons in addition to lung cancer risk (and the fact that it is illegal in most states) to avoid marijuana. Marijuana likely increases the risk of testicular cancer, prostate cancer, cervical cancer, a type of brain tumor, and the risk of leukemia in the offspring of women who use it during pregnancy.
And I don't need to smoke anything to relax..ya know, the complete opposite of a weakling smoker. Have fun playing it "safe" with such a "safe" substance, BaldyLocks.
-
SixSickSins wrote: »BlackxChild wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »BlackxChild wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »Mr. Whatchasay wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »This is wonderful news. Smoker's "smoking rights" must be disenfranchised. I hope each perpetrator of this lovely law is caught in violation 2+ times and pinned with a felony. I am smiling for everyone in FL today since they will be breathing easier. This has inspired me to write a suggestive letter to my own congressmen in the hopes that they follow suit with this HOS (Hard On Smokers) greatness. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The Black Creator has blessed us all.
simmer down lil one, weed smoke doesnt cause lung cancer or any other respiratory problems, never affected anyone by 2nd hand smoke
U cant fight the fight for blacks but turn around and discriminate against another group, you wylin lil one
Just because I uplift one group doesn't mean I can't discriminate against another. I discriminate against crakkkas daily. Keep thinking it "seemingly" doesn't hurt you. "But no one has died..it's clearly the safer alternative to tobacco!!!1!".
No. This law is lovely and I revel in its glory.
Statistics show that you are less likely to have cancer if you smoke weed. I don't show that I'm stressed at all but when I am I get patches in my hair (most ppl dont notice) the only way it goes away is if I smoke weed.
"Statistics" also state that you're a ? . What's a lil cancer to a balding ? ?
You should probably learn to manage your stress in different methods in order to make an informed decision on "the only way it goes away".
The thang yall n00bs fail to realize about "statistics" is that they're so malleable to whims, it's not even funny. I can conjure up a statistic to proclaim anything I want it to say if I utilize the right population of folks.
I can statistically prove ? is real... if I assess the correct population of folks.
Remedial maff muhfuckas. Flawda doing something right for once and you all want to complain. Pity.
You have anger issues, maybe you should smoke some green. I'm not going bald by the way and the only person whose a ? is you. You're a crazy ? .
Here is my "statistic". You should believe it since you blindly believe other ones:
Question: Does Smoking Marijuana Cause Lung Cancer?
Answer:
The link between smoking tobacco and lung cancer is undeniable, but does smoking marijuana cause lung cancer, too? The short answer -- probably.
In 2006, many of us in medicine were shocked when a review of research to date did not show an increase in lung cancer related to marijuana use. There was even a suggestion that marijuana had a protective effect against lung cancer. More recent studies, in contrast, do appear to link smoking marijuana with lung cancer.
One study demonstrated a doubling in lung cancer for male marijuana smokers who also used tobacco (i.e. for men who smoked the same amount, the risk of lung cancer was twice as high for men who also used marijuana.) Another study found that long-term use of marijuana increased the risk of lung cancer in young adults (55 and under), with the risk increasing in proportion to the amount of marijuana smoked.
Why the controversy?
Since marijuana is illegal, it is hard to do the controlled studies that have been done with tobacco. Because of this, it helps to look at what we do know about marijuana:
Many of the carcinogens and co-carcinogens present in tobacco smoke are also present in smoke from marijuana.
Marijuana smoking does cause inflammation and cell damage, and it has been associated with pre-cancerous changes in lung tissue.
Marijuana has been shown to cause immune system dysfunction, possibly predisposing individuals to cancer.
Bottom line: Though marijuana most likely pales in cancer risk when compared to cigarette smoking, it's better to play it safe. There are reasons in addition to lung cancer risk (and the fact that it is illegal in most states) to avoid marijuana. Marijuana likely increases the risk of testicular cancer, prostate cancer, cervical cancer, a type of brain tumor, and the risk of leukemia in the offspring of women who use it during pregnancy.
And I don't need to smoke anything to relax..ya know, the complete opposite of a weakling smoker. Have fun playing it "safe" with such a "safe" substance, BaldyLocks.
Co-Sign!!!!! -
SixSickSins wrote: »BlackxChild wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »BlackxChild wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »Mr. Whatchasay wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »This is wonderful news. Smoker's "smoking rights" must be disenfranchised. I hope each perpetrator of this lovely law is caught in violation 2+ times and pinned with a felony. I am smiling for everyone in FL today since they will be breathing easier. This has inspired me to write a suggestive letter to my own congressmen in the hopes that they follow suit with this HOS (Hard On Smokers) greatness. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The Black Creator has blessed us all.
simmer down lil one, weed smoke doesnt cause lung cancer or any other respiratory problems, never affected anyone by 2nd hand smoke
U cant fight the fight for blacks but turn around and discriminate against another group, you wylin lil one
Just because I uplift one group doesn't mean I can't discriminate against another. I discriminate against crakkkas daily. Keep thinking it "seemingly" doesn't hurt you. "But no one has died..it's clearly the safer alternative to tobacco!!!1!".
No. This law is lovely and I revel in its glory.
Statistics show that you are less likely to have cancer if you smoke weed. I don't show that I'm stressed at all but when I am I get patches in my hair (most ppl dont notice) the only way it goes away is if I smoke weed.
"Statistics" also state that you're a ? . What's a lil cancer to a balding ? ?
You should probably learn to manage your stress in different methods in order to make an informed decision on "the only way it goes away".
The thang yall n00bs fail to realize about "statistics" is that they're so malleable to whims, it's not even funny. I can conjure up a statistic to proclaim anything I want it to say if I utilize the right population of folks.
I can statistically prove ? is real... if I assess the correct population of folks.
Remedial maff muhfuckas. Flawda doing something right for once and you all want to complain. Pity.
You have anger issues, maybe you should smoke some green. I'm not going bald by the way and the only person whose a ? is you. You're a crazy ? .
Here is my "statistic". You should believe it since you blindly believe other ones:
Question: Does Smoking Marijuana Cause Lung Cancer?
Answer:
The link between smoking tobacco and lung cancer is undeniable, but does smoking marijuana cause lung cancer, too? The short answer -- probably.
In 2006, many of us in medicine were shocked when a review of research to date did not show an increase in lung cancer related to marijuana use. There was even a suggestion that marijuana had a protective effect against lung cancer. More recent studies, in contrast, do appear to link smoking marijuana with lung cancer.
One study demonstrated a doubling in lung cancer for male marijuana smokers who also used tobacco (i.e. for men who smoked the same amount, the risk of lung cancer was twice as high for men who also used marijuana.) Another study found that long-term use of marijuana increased the risk of lung cancer in young adults (55 and under), with the risk increasing in proportion to the amount of marijuana smoked.
Why the controversy?
Since marijuana is illegal, it is hard to do the controlled studies that have been done with tobacco. Because of this, it helps to look at what we do know about marijuana:
Many of the carcinogens and co-carcinogens present in tobacco smoke are also present in smoke from marijuana.
Marijuana smoking does cause inflammation and cell damage, and it has been associated with pre-cancerous changes in lung tissue.
Marijuana has been shown to cause immune system dysfunction, possibly predisposing individuals to cancer.
Bottom line: Though marijuana most likely pales in cancer risk when compared to cigarette smoking, it's better to play it safe. There are reasons in addition to lung cancer risk (and the fact that it is illegal in most states) to avoid marijuana. Marijuana likely increases the risk of testicular cancer, prostate cancer, cervical cancer, a type of brain tumor, and the risk of leukemia in the offspring of women who use it during pregnancy.
And I don't need to smoke anything to relax..ya know, the complete opposite of a weakling smoker. Have fun playing it "safe" with such a "safe" substance, BaldyLocks.
I like the article I read better.... I haven't smoked in months though.
-
SixSickSins wrote: »BlackxChild wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »BlackxChild wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »Mr. Whatchasay wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »This is wonderful news. Smoker's "smoking rights" must be disenfranchised. I hope each perpetrator of this lovely law is caught in violation 2+ times and pinned with a felony. I am smiling for everyone in FL today since they will be breathing easier. This has inspired me to write a suggestive letter to my own congressmen in the hopes that they follow suit with this HOS (Hard On Smokers) greatness. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The Black Creator has blessed us all.
simmer down lil one, weed smoke doesnt cause lung cancer or any other respiratory problems, never affected anyone by 2nd hand smoke
U cant fight the fight for blacks but turn around and discriminate against another group, you wylin lil one
Just because I uplift one group doesn't mean I can't discriminate against another. I discriminate against crakkkas daily. Keep thinking it "seemingly" doesn't hurt you. "But no one has died..it's clearly the safer alternative to tobacco!!!1!".
No. This law is lovely and I revel in its glory.
Statistics show that you are less likely to have cancer if you smoke weed. I don't show that I'm stressed at all but when I am I get patches in my hair (most ppl dont notice) the only way it goes away is if I smoke weed.
"Statistics" also state that you're a ? . What's a lil cancer to a balding ? ?
You should probably learn to manage your stress in different methods in order to make an informed decision on "the only way it goes away".
The thang yall n00bs fail to realize about "statistics" is that they're so malleable to whims, it's not even funny. I can conjure up a statistic to proclaim anything I want it to say if I utilize the right population of folks.
I can statistically prove ? is real... if I assess the correct population of folks.
Remedial maff muhfuckas. Flawda doing something right for once and you all want to complain. Pity.
You have anger issues, maybe you should smoke some green. I'm not going bald by the way and the only person whose a ? is you. You're a crazy ? .
Here is my "statistic". You should believe it since you blindly believe other ones:
Question: Does Smoking Marijuana Cause Lung Cancer?
Answer:
The link between smoking tobacco and lung cancer is undeniable, but does smoking marijuana cause lung cancer, too? The short answer -- probably.
In 2006, many of us in medicine were shocked when a review of research to date did not show an increase in lung cancer related to marijuana use. There was even a suggestion that marijuana had a protective effect against lung cancer. More recent studies, in contrast, do appear to link smoking marijuana with lung cancer.
One study demonstrated a doubling in lung cancer for male marijuana smokers who also used tobacco (i.e. for men who smoked the same amount, the risk of lung cancer was twice as high for men who also used marijuana.) Another study found that long-term use of marijuana increased the risk of lung cancer in young adults (55 and under), with the risk increasing in proportion to the amount of marijuana smoked.
Why the controversy?
Since marijuana is illegal, it is hard to do the controlled studies that have been done with tobacco. Because of this, it helps to look at what we do know about marijuana:
Many of the carcinogens and co-carcinogens present in tobacco smoke are also present in smoke from marijuana.
Marijuana smoking does cause inflammation and cell damage, and it has been associated with pre-cancerous changes in lung tissue.
Marijuana has been shown to cause immune system dysfunction, possibly predisposing individuals to cancer.
Bottom line: Though marijuana most likely pales in cancer risk when compared to cigarette smoking, it's better to play it safe. There are reasons in addition to lung cancer risk (and the fact that it is illegal in most states) to avoid marijuana. Marijuana likely increases the risk of testicular cancer, prostate cancer, cervical cancer, a type of brain tumor, and the risk of leukemia in the offspring of women who use it during pregnancy.
And I don't need to smoke anything to relax..ya know, the complete opposite of a weakling smoker. Have fun playing it "safe" with such a "safe" substance, BaldyLocks.
six i never thought id hear you backin a republican cracka who signed this law cause he has stock in private prisons
this doesnt have to do with health, or any of that juvenile ? positive ? you think its about
its about money and you applaud these crackas abusin laws to line they pockets
hoe you silly, all that militant ? you on is a joke
-
I hate this place sometimes
-
A vanilla dutch rello at mobil $1.54
-
SixSickSins wrote: »BlackxChild wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »BlackxChild wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »Mr. Whatchasay wrote: »SixSickSins wrote: »This is wonderful news. Smoker's "smoking rights" must be disenfranchised. I hope each perpetrator of this lovely law is caught in violation 2+ times and pinned with a felony. I am smiling for everyone in FL today since they will be breathing easier. This has inspired me to write a suggestive letter to my own congressmen in the hopes that they follow suit with this HOS (Hard On Smokers) greatness. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The Black Creator has blessed us all.
simmer down lil one, weed smoke doesnt cause lung cancer or any other respiratory problems, never affected anyone by 2nd hand smoke
U cant fight the fight for blacks but turn around and discriminate against another group, you wylin lil one
Just because I uplift one group doesn't mean I can't discriminate against another. I discriminate against crakkkas daily. Keep thinking it "seemingly" doesn't hurt you. "But no one has died..it's clearly the safer alternative to tobacco!!!1!".
No. This law is lovely and I revel in its glory.
Statistics show that you are less likely to have cancer if you smoke weed. I don't show that I'm stressed at all but when I am I get patches in my hair (most ppl dont notice) the only way it goes away is if I smoke weed.
"Statistics" also state that you're a ? . What's a lil cancer to a balding ? ?
You should probably learn to manage your stress in different methods in order to make an informed decision on "the only way it goes away".
The thang yall n00bs fail to realize about "statistics" is that they're so malleable to whims, it's not even funny. I can conjure up a statistic to proclaim anything I want it to say if I utilize the right population of folks.
I can statistically prove ? is real... if I assess the correct population of folks.
Remedial maff muhfuckas. Flawda doing something right for once and you all want to complain. Pity.
You have anger issues, maybe you should smoke some green. I'm not going bald by the way and the only person whose a ? is you. You're a crazy ? .
Here is my "statistic". You should believe it since you blindly believe other ones:
Question: Does Smoking Marijuana Cause Lung Cancer?
Answer:
The link between smoking tobacco and lung cancer is undeniable, but does smoking marijuana cause lung cancer, too? The short answer -- probably.
In 2006, many of us in medicine were shocked when a review of research to date did not show an increase in lung cancer related to marijuana use. There was even a suggestion that marijuana had a protective effect against lung cancer. More recent studies, in contrast, do appear to link smoking marijuana with lung cancer.
One study demonstrated a doubling in lung cancer for male marijuana smokers who also used tobacco (i.e. for men who smoked the same amount, the risk of lung cancer was twice as high for men who also used marijuana.) Another study found that long-term use of marijuana increased the risk of lung cancer in young adults (55 and under), with the risk increasing in proportion to the amount of marijuana smoked.
Why the controversy?
Since marijuana is illegal, it is hard to do the controlled studies that have been done with tobacco. Because of this, it helps to look at what we do know about marijuana:
Many of the carcinogens and co-carcinogens present in tobacco smoke are also present in smoke from marijuana.
Marijuana smoking does cause inflammation and cell damage, and it has been associated with pre-cancerous changes in lung tissue.
Marijuana has been shown to cause immune system dysfunction, possibly predisposing individuals to cancer.
Bottom line: Though marijuana most likely pales in cancer risk when compared to cigarette smoking, it's better to play it safe. There are reasons in addition to lung cancer risk (and the fact that it is illegal in most states) to avoid marijuana. Marijuana likely increases the risk of testicular cancer, prostate cancer, cervical cancer, a type of brain tumor, and the risk of leukemia in the offspring of women who use it during pregnancy.
And I don't need to smoke anything to relax..ya know, the complete opposite of a weakling smoker. Have fun playing it "safe" with such a "safe" substance, BaldyLocks.
six i never thought id hear you backin a republican cracka who signed this law cause he has stock in private prisons
this doesnt have to do with health, or any of that juvenile ? positive ? you think its about
its about money and you applaud these crackas abusin laws to line they pockets
hoe you silly, all that militant ? you on is a joke
Don't start, you wishy washy muhfucka. 'Bout time a crakkka did something useful in his worthless life. Not my fault you have placed "Blacks" synonymous with "weed smoker". It will affect many races, clearly.
It's a good deterrence for young Blacks who see older people smoking. But you don't see beneficial aspects like that. You just see that your smoke ? won't be as accessible. Selfish ? ? ? . -
@DaCaliKingDaCaliKing wrote: »ineedpussy wrote: »DaCaliKing wrote: »how we gonna have two states that legalized weed
n mfs still goin to jail for a dime sack the next state over
that ? don't even make sense to me
cops here in ky are bad off that ? ..find u a with a dime sack n swear on everything that u a kingpin or cold blooded murderer or sum ?
its 2013 this ? has got to END
@DaCaliKing
? you aint in no damn ky. hell most of the time they catch you with a dime bag theyll either take it and tell you to gtfoh depending how you came at em. or they will just give you a citation. and who the ? gets dime bags? thats so 96
yea u clearly must know where i'm at
dumb ? smfh
dime sack was an example of how these pigs trip over a lil bit of nothin.
cause you aint my ? . get it correct. you up in covington, ashland or newport aint you? -
ineedpussy wrote: »
@DaCaliKingDaCaliKing wrote: »ineedpussy wrote: »DaCaliKing wrote: »how we gonna have two states that legalized weed
n mfs still goin to jail for a dime sack the next state over
that ? don't even make sense to me
cops here in ky are bad off that ? ..find u a with a dime sack n swear on everything that u a kingpin or cold blooded murderer or sum ?
its 2013 this ? has got to END
@DaCaliKing
? you aint in no damn ky. hell most of the time they catch you with a dime bag theyll either take it and tell you to gtfoh depending how you came at em. or they will just give you a citation. and who the ? gets dime bags? thats so 96
yea u clearly must know where i'm at
dumb ? smfh
dime sack was an example of how these pigs trip over a lil bit of nothin.
cause you aint my ? . get it correct. you up in covington, ashland or newport aint you?
? u ? ? or sumthin?? why u so worried bout where im at GTFOH
Im in ky all day every day. aint got ? to prove. petty ass ? .
quit pullin ya skirt up ?
-
Vapes>> bongs>> pipes>> papers>> blunts
-
Murphy Oil has swishers all flavors 74 cents for the double pack, thats with tax. I aint a huge fan of swisher but I am a big fan of the .74.nickel-us P wrote: »A vanilla dutch rello at mobil $1.54
-
Murphy Oil has swishers all flavors 74 cents for the double pack, thats with tax. I aint a huge fan of swisher but I am a big fan of the .74.nickel-us P wrote: »A vanilla dutch rello at mobil $1.54
Games been 79 cent each for a minute out here. or 2pack white owls for 1.10 or sumthn.. 3 pack palma dutchies for not even $2 i think
swishas burn faster -
So this would include tobacco pipes?
-
2 pack swishers = 1.08
3 pack good times = 1.08
1 pom pom = .65
i'm a blunt person myself.
i don't like certain 'studies' because at the end of ALL of them, they say 'they can't be adequately tested'.
i do think that you're better off not smoking, but c'mon. y'all can't really see what he's trying to do.?? even the news call him a '? ? ' [in so many words]
