Yooo These Feminist Hoes Really be Wildin
Options
Comments
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
No disrespect, but ? a feminist
How is there this magical invisible "oppression" when in this country
The mere allegation of ? without any proof whatsoever, can and will destroy a mans entire existence. AND if it's proven she lied or recants, it's no ? given
Women get custody of the kids by default no matter how ? up they might be while a man has to go to court just to get the every other weekend ? . If he actually wants to be an involved parent, then that's more money + court time.
Men are being forced to pay for children who aren't theirs, even at the admission of the mother, she is still not charged with any fraud.
The local police and courts are fatality moves if ever a woman feels scorned by her man. A quick domestic violence charge is only a phone call away regardless of proof
A woman can ? a mans pockets, put him in the poor house and it's all good. Women ain't shootin in the gym, or runnin those routes, but they damn sure cashin checks and crying for more, no matter how ridiculous their claim is or how irresponsible they are with the money
and on and on. Basically, american women need to shut the ? up. Women in other countries are REALLY oppressed. We're talking women who get burned or stoned for actually being ? . Women who get the ? kicked outta them and nobody cares. Women are are barred from even going to ? school in some places. Yall american women winnin like a muthafucka. -
It is cleared that those women are exagerating. That s the type of extremists i was talking about in the Sixsicksins ' thread.
But we must not overlook that America as many contries have a ? problem.
Look at the US air force ? percentage nearly 20%.
Also domestic violence rates are still high.
Unfortunately those mentioned women are not the solution period.
Education communication and respect are to be tought to our children. -
This is what happens when women stray too far from the kitchen, look men in their eyes, and think for themselves...
-
-
those bat ? crazy women are looked at as pioneers in the ? feminist movement, WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALMBOUT!??!
really? ANDREA DWORKIN?
that ? had women who were getting paid for porn thinking they were doing it against their will!
you should have seen the number she did on Linda Lovelace...
Like @lemzola said, those women are extremists. They may support feminism but they're taking it WAYY too far. -
sweetheart93 wrote: »those bat ? crazy women are looked at as pioneers in the ? feminist movement, WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TALMBOUT!??!
really? ANDREA DWORKIN?
that ? had women who were getting paid for porn thinking they were doing it against their will!
you should have seen the number she did on Linda Lovelace...
Like @lemzola said, those women are extremists. They may support feminism but they're taking it WAYY too far.
Its worst than that. They are infiltrators with a mission to derail true feminism.
They are similar to druggs and alcohol in ghettos. -
@ts you woul have done a better job by balancing with true feminists messages and vids
-
Real feminists?
-
The user and all related content has been deleted.
-
-
@sweetheart93 since you wanna flag me for abuse
tell me this, do you support NOW or do you see them as extremists too?
See my problem with the face of feminism, is it ain't about equality as much as it is special treatment. The N.O.W for one, fights tooth and nail against equal custody rights under the guise of "oppression of women". As if acknowledging a father has just as many rights to parent the child he helped create as the mother does is somehow damaging and threatening to women.
-
Where are they at? because the only ones that get spotlight are the goofy ? .sweetheart93 wrote: »
No disrespect, but ? a feminist
How is there this magical invisible "oppression" when in this country
The mere allegation of ? without any proof whatsoever, can and will destroy a mans entire existence. AND if it's proven she lied or recants, it's no ? given
Women get custody of the kids by default no matter how ? up they might be while a man has to go to court just to get the every other weekend ? . If he actually wants to be an involved parent, then that's more money + court time.
Men are being forced to pay for children who aren't theirs, even at the admission of the mother, she is still not charged with any fraud.
The local police and courts are fatality moves if ever a woman feels scorned by her man. A quick domestic violence charge is only a phone call away regardless of proof
A woman can ? a mans pockets, put him in the poor house and it's all good. Women ain't shootin in the gym, or runnin those routes, but they damn sure cashin checks and crying for more, no matter how ridiculous their claim is or how irresponsible they are with the money
Are you saying sweethart none of these happen? He's exaggerating? He has feelings? -
I am creating a thread about equality and equity.
-
It is human to only see the bad side of the people you dont like to justify your deeds.
Racist people always talk about the flaws of the detested other race to justify their actions againt them.
We are quick to show the extremist instead of the moderate ones -
sweetheart93 wrote: »WHOA Don't confuse those psychos with real feminists. I'm a feminist and I don't agree with anything those ? are saying. They sound crazy as hell.
What do you think about the claim that the introduction of feminism to black women is partially to blame for the rift between black women and men today. In a nutshell, the idea stems from the fact that in the past black women were not in the same position as white women. They had a more equal role in the household, and there was no issue with them working or holding high positions things associated with blacks (the Civil RIghts movement for example). White women needed more power and bodies to support their cause so they recruited black women. Which is fine since there are rights that women needed to fight for, however, white feminists poisoned black women with this idea that they needed to break the chains and rebel against their oppressive when in the black community no such oppression existed.
-
It is human to only see the bad side of the people you dont like to justify your deeds.
Racist people always talk about the flaws of the detested other race to justify their actions againt them.
We are quick to show the extremist instead of the moderate ones
So doesn't this also hold true for feminist views that men are oppressing them in some kind of way? I'm all for equality, but true equality. Like of course women should get paid the same as men for doing the same job. That's a given. But here's the catch, are women who are making less for doing the same job as their male counterparts, making less because they lacked negotiating skills? Life to a degree is about what you can negotiate, especially in the work force. I see women everyday in corporate america making plenty dough and getting plenty of respect because of how they handle theirs.
Again that's the problem. It's more so about special treatment based on gender -
The Lonious Monk wrote: »sweetheart93 wrote: »WHOA Don't confuse those psychos with real feminists. I'm a feminist and I don't agree with anything those ? are saying. They sound crazy as hell.
What do you think about the claim that the introduction of feminism to black women is partially to blame for the rift between black women and men today. In a nutshell, the idea stems from the fact that in the past black women were not in the same position as white women. They had a more equal role in the household, and there was no issue with them working or holding high positions things associated with blacks (the Civil RIghts movement for example). White women needed more power and bodies to support their cause so they recruited black women. Which is fine since there are rights that women needed to fight for, however, white feminists poisoned black women with this idea that they needed to break the chains and rebel against their oppressive when in the black community no such oppression existed.
No bruh i they are infiltrators with a mission. Look at your gang culture. It has been infiltrated to create black on black violence instead of the prior black defense.
Moreso individualism urban lifestyle have also their share on the destruction of the familily nucleus -
The Lonious Monk wrote: »sweetheart93 wrote: »WHOA Don't confuse those psychos with real feminists. I'm a feminist and I don't agree with anything those ? are saying. They sound crazy as hell.
What do you think about the claim that the introduction of feminism to black women is partially to blame for the rift between black women and men today. In a nutshell, the idea stems from the fact that in the past black women were not in the same position as white women. They had a more equal role in the household, and there was no issue with them working or holding high positions things associated with blacks (the Civil RIghts movement for example). White women needed more power and bodies to support their cause so they recruited black women. Which is fine since there are rights that women needed to fight for, however, white feminists poisoned black women with this idea that they needed to break the chains and rebel against their oppressive when in the black community no such oppression existed.
I think that is exactly the reason there is a rift between not only black me and black women, but men and women in general. Marriage, historically, has been a patriarchal institution. When women were able to get jobs and be financially equal to men, the necessity of marriage waned. Couple that with single mothers raising single girls to be independent, and you have a rise in "independent" chicks that still want the benefits of a dependent based marriage. -
The Lonious Monk wrote: »sweetheart93 wrote: »WHOA Don't confuse those psychos with real feminists. I'm a feminist and I don't agree with anything those ? are saying. They sound crazy as hell.
What do you think about the claim that the introduction of feminism to black women is partially to blame for the rift between black women and men today. In a nutshell, the idea stems from the fact that in the past black women were not in the same position as white women. They had a more equal role in the household, and there was no issue with them working or holding high positions things associated with blacks (the Civil RIghts movement for example). White women needed more power and bodies to support their cause so they recruited black women. Which is fine since there are rights that women needed to fight for, however, white feminists poisoned black women with this idea that they needed to break the chains and rebel against their oppressive when in the black community no such oppression existed.
You burnt down the thread with the truth.
Fact is, feminism was never meant for black women to share in it's success as a movement and at the sametime it helped ? up our family structure. Was it solely to blame? No? But it had a hand.
Look at the generations of our women who see raising a family as a burden, instead of a gift. A lotta ppl got it twisted, these white women might talk tough in public but they are making sure they play their part at home with the family so that they thrive together. -
manofmorehouse wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »sweetheart93 wrote: »WHOA Don't confuse those psychos with real feminists. I'm a feminist and I don't agree with anything those ? are saying. They sound crazy as hell.
What do you think about the claim that the introduction of feminism to black women is partially to blame for the rift between black women and men today. In a nutshell, the idea stems from the fact that in the past black women were not in the same position as white women. They had a more equal role in the household, and there was no issue with them working or holding high positions things associated with blacks (the Civil RIghts movement for example). White women needed more power and bodies to support their cause so they recruited black women. Which is fine since there are rights that women needed to fight for, however, white feminists poisoned black women with this idea that they needed to break the chains and rebel against their oppressive when in the black community no such oppression existed.
I think that is exactly the reason there is a rift between not only black me and black women, but men and women in general. Marriage, historically, has been a patriarchal institution. When women were able to get jobs and be financially equal to men, the necessity of marriage waned. Couple that with single mothers raising single girls to be independent, and you have a rise in "independent" chicks that still want the benefits of a dependent based marriage.
Men have psychologicaly placed their manhood in money. Now they are feeling castrated because the wife can gain the same money even more.
Men who still think that money is the only way to make a women falling in love are lost nowadays... -
@sweetheart93 since you wanna flag me for abuse
tell me this, do you support NOW or do you see them as extremists too?
See my problem with the face of feminism, is it ain't about equality as much as it is special treatment. The N.O.W for one, fights tooth and nail against equal custody rights under the guise of "oppression of women". As if acknowledging a father has just as many rights to parent the child he helped create as the mother does is somehow damaging and threatening to women.
I wouldn't say they're extremists, maybe biased against men. But no I don't support it.
-
manofmorehouse wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »sweetheart93 wrote: »WHOA Don't confuse those psychos with real feminists. I'm a feminist and I don't agree with anything those ? are saying. They sound crazy as hell.
What do you think about the claim that the introduction of feminism to black women is partially to blame for the rift between black women and men today. In a nutshell, the idea stems from the fact that in the past black women were not in the same position as white women. They had a more equal role in the household, and there was no issue with them working or holding high positions things associated with blacks (the Civil RIghts movement for example). White women needed more power and bodies to support their cause so they recruited black women. Which is fine since there are rights that women needed to fight for, however, white feminists poisoned black women with this idea that they needed to break the chains and rebel against their oppressive when in the black community no such oppression existed.
I think that is exactly the reason there is a rift between not only black me and black women, but men and women in general. Marriage, historically, has been a patriarchal institution. When women were able to get jobs and be financially equal to men, the necessity of marriage waned. Couple that with single mothers raising single girls to be independent, and you have a rise in "independent" chicks that still want the benefits of a dependent based marriage.
Men have psychologicaly placed their manhood in money. Now they are feeling castrated because the wife can gain the same money even more.
Men who still think that money is the only way to make a women falling in love are lost nowadays...
It's actually women who have done that. Men have always been the providers and women have always preferred men who were able to provide and protect. That's just nature. It's when women started making as much or more than their man, did they turn around and use that as if it were a position of power. Any man with good sense doesn't give a damn if his woman makes more than him so long as he's pulling his own weight. It's when some of these women think that makes them the man in the relationship do things get funky. -
manofmorehouse wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »sweetheart93 wrote: »WHOA Don't confuse those psychos with real feminists. I'm a feminist and I don't agree with anything those ? are saying. They sound crazy as hell.
What do you think about the claim that the introduction of feminism to black women is partially to blame for the rift between black women and men today. In a nutshell, the idea stems from the fact that in the past black women were not in the same position as white women. They had a more equal role in the household, and there was no issue with them working or holding high positions things associated with blacks (the Civil RIghts movement for example). White women needed more power and bodies to support their cause so they recruited black women. Which is fine since there are rights that women needed to fight for, however, white feminists poisoned black women with this idea that they needed to break the chains and rebel against their oppressive when in the black community no such oppression existed.
I think that is exactly the reason there is a rift between not only black me and black women, but men and women in general. Marriage, historically, has been a patriarchal institution. When women were able to get jobs and be financially equal to men, the necessity of marriage waned. Couple that with single mothers raising single girls to be independent, and you have a rise in "independent" chicks that still want the benefits of a dependent based marriage.
Men have psychologicaly placed their manhood in money. Now they are feeling castrated because the wife can gain the same money even more.
Men who still think that money is the only way to make a women falling in love are lost nowadays...
I disagree with you for this matter alone: it is women that place men's value and worth in his pockets. Even today, the most feminist woman in the world would trade all that ? rhetoric for a husband who fully takes care of her and her kids. Yet, in this world of "gender equality" NO woman is checking for a man looking to be fully taken care of. The main reason for divorce revolves around money. The lack of respect shown in relationships revolves around money. Don't kid yourself -
Classic case of ? envy. Nh
![[Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/15efd8efe08bb34aae25f1808aaf5018.svg)
