Ayesha Curry Vs. Thots Pt. 2
Options
Comments
-
BackInWhite wrote: »? that ?
I hope she poisons that light skinned ?
I hope riley hair fall out
? them as a family, unit, group of people, TEAM
? em
Bruh what the ? ??
All that hate meanwhile The Curry household is
-
how did i know that the wife of satan would make an appearance in this thread
I have no dealings with that woman -
Those memes are hilarious.
These ? 's are "back-benchers" in the black male--female civil dating war.
They're engaged in an "arms race" to see who can out-? the other chick, out-rachet the other chick, in misguided--sloppy attempts to get a good man.
And Aisha Curry, is the antithesis to that. She didn't have to be a ? in order to snag a baller. She just focused on the basics. Food, faithfulness & family. (First).
-
damobb2deep wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »Ita a fair assessment. If someone tells you or acts like there is only one way to behave and act to be worthy of respect then you would be offended too.
The problem is here is she isn't doing the judging. She is being pointed out as a standard and folks reject that standard. Ain't ? wrong with that. Yall complain if you think a ? should only dress and behave a certain way to be worthy of respect.
Yep
It’s intertwined with the politics of respectability
Her persona is being used as another opportunity for the basement dwellers to attack any woman who isn’t buttoned up, any woman who has an overtly sexy image, and any woman who doesn’t meet the measurement for “wifeability" or better yet respect gets the “we need more women like Ayesha”
Which is obviously problematic
And it is dangerous for the women who are being attacked for not “living up” to an ideal I'm sure they never declared any allegiance to in the first place
Now she is catching some of the blow back
Her initial tweets that started this whole thing about being covered up were a lil problematic as well, so she isn't exactly innocent. In a roundabout way she insinuated that women who dress a certain way are doing it for the wrong reasons, as if women don't have other reasons besides the male gaze to prefer a certain style of clothing
It's unfortunate, but she'll survive
honest question why do women wear things like thong bikinis... short shorts... and high cut skirts... for other than male attention.
Lol
Women, like men, often dress according to fashion. So maybe she may just want to be trendy and stylish
We love our bodies. And like the way it makes our bodies look
Or maybe because it's hot
For the sake of knowing most other women you know wouldn't be able to pull the same outfit off
Not as if there is anything wrong with a heterosexual woman seeking male attention- feeling desirable and attractive feels good
There are other ways to gain a man's attention. What we choose to wear is just one way
Same as when a man dresses a certain way, or puts on cologne, or buys a particular car to attract women
If me simply wearing a thong bikini provokes a man into groping me or calling me out my name that is out of my control and should reflect poorly upon him
All this talk of what should be considered respectable is just another way to police and govern over anyone who doesn't adhere to the traditional values of white, Christian, hetero men -
desertrain10 wrote: »Ita a fair assessment. If someone tells you or acts like there is only one way to behave and act to be worthy of respect then you would be offended too.
The problem is here is she isn't doing the judging. She is being pointed out as a standard and folks reject that standard. Ain't ? wrong with that. Yall complain if you think a ? should only dress and behave a certain way to be worthy of respect.
Yep
It’s intertwined with the politics of respectability
Her persona is being used as another opportunity for the basement dwellers to attack any woman who isn’t buttoned up, any woman who has an overtly sexy image, and any woman who doesn’t meet the measurement for “wifeability" or better yet respect gets the “we need more women like Ayesha”
Which is obviously problematic
And it is dangerous for the women who are being attacked for not “living up” to an ideal I'm sure they never declared any allegiance to in the first place
Now she is catching some of the blow back
Her initial tweets that started this whole thing about being covered up were a lil problematic as well, so she isn't exactly innocent. In a roundabout way she insinuated that women who dress a certain way are doing it for the wrong reasons, as if women don't have other reasons besides the male gaze to prefer a certain style of clothing
It's unfortunate, but she'll survive
That's not her fault though. She didn't say that, other people put that image of being the standard onto her. People coming at her personally for some ? she didn't do, say, or ask for. That's why people say those who got negative things to say are projecting their own insecurities onto a person who don't got ? to do with how they feel. If somebody simply living their life can make you not like them, you're the problem.
Her initial tweets weren't even that bad, people just made more of them than what they were on some hit dog will holler ? . People want her to be the stereotype of an athlete's wife so bad and the fact that she's not ? some people off. -
desertrain10 wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »Ita a fair assessment. If someone tells you or acts like there is only one way to behave and act to be worthy of respect then you would be offended too.
The problem is here is she isn't doing the judging. She is being pointed out as a standard and folks reject that standard. Ain't ? wrong with that. Yall complain if you think a ? should only dress and behave a certain way to be worthy of respect.
Yep
It’s intertwined with the politics of respectability
Her persona is being used as another opportunity for the basement dwellers to attack any woman who isn’t buttoned up, any woman who has an overtly sexy image, and any woman who doesn’t meet the measurement for “wifeability" or better yet respect gets the “we need more women like Ayesha”
Which is obviously problematic
And it is dangerous for the women who are being attacked for not “living up” to an ideal I'm sure they never declared any allegiance to in the first place
Now she is catching some of the blow back
Her initial tweets that started this whole thing about being covered up were a lil problematic as well, so she isn't exactly innocent. In a roundabout way she insinuated that women who dress a certain way are doing it for the wrong reasons, as if women don't have other reasons besides the male gaze to prefer a certain style of clothing
It's unfortunate, but she'll survive
honest question why do women wear things like thong bikinis... short shorts... and high cut skirts... for other than male attention.
Lol
Women, like men, often dress according to fashion. So maybe she may just want to be trendy and stylish
We love our bodies. And like the way it makes our bodies look
Or maybe because it's hot
For the sake of knowing most other women you know wouldn't be able to pull the same outfit off
Not as if there is anything wrong with a heterosexual woman seeking male attention- feeling desirable and attractive feels good
There are other ways to gain a man's attention. What we choose to wear is just one way
Same as when a man dresses a certain way, or puts on cologne, or buys a particular car to attract women
If me simply wearing a thong bikini provokes a man into groping me or calling me out my name that is out of my control and should reflect poorly upon him
All this talk of what should be considered respectable is just another way to police and govern over anyone who doesn't adhere to the traditional values of white, Christian, hetero men
Stop worry about this fuckery and find a MAN you are going to end up as a cat lady if you continue this feminist ?
[img][/img] -
desertrain10 wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »Ita a fair assessment. If someone tells you or acts like there is only one way to behave and act to be worthy of respect then you would be offended too.
The problem is here is she isn't doing the judging. She is being pointed out as a standard and folks reject that standard. Ain't ? wrong with that. Yall complain if you think a ? should only dress and behave a certain way to be worthy of respect.
Yep
It’s intertwined with the politics of respectability
Her persona is being used as another opportunity for the basement dwellers to attack any woman who isn’t buttoned up, any woman who has an overtly sexy image, and any woman who doesn’t meet the measurement for “wifeability" or better yet respect gets the “we need more women like Ayesha”
Which is obviously problematic
And it is dangerous for the women who are being attacked for not “living up” to an ideal I'm sure they never declared any allegiance to in the first place
Now she is catching some of the blow back
Her initial tweets that started this whole thing about being covered up were a lil problematic as well, so she isn't exactly innocent. In a roundabout way she insinuated that women who dress a certain way are doing it for the wrong reasons, as if women don't have other reasons besides the male gaze to prefer a certain style of clothing
It's unfortunate, but she'll survive
honest question why do women wear things like thong bikinis... short shorts... and high cut skirts... for other than male attention.
Lol
Women, like men, often dress according to fashion. So maybe she may just want to be trendy and stylish
We love our bodies. And like the way it makes our bodies look
Or maybe because it's hot
For the sake of knowing most other women you know wouldn't be able to pull the same outfit off
Not as if there is anything wrong with a heterosexual woman seeking male attention- feeling desirable and attractive feels good
There are other ways to gain a man's attention. What we choose to wear is just one way
Same as when a man dresses a certain way, or puts on cologne, or buys a particular car to attract women
If me simply wearing a thong bikini provokes a man into groping me or calling me out my name that is out of my control and should reflect poorly upon him
All this talk of what should be considered respectable is just another way to police and govern over anyone who doesn't adhere to the traditional values of white, Christian, hetero men
but you can be trendy and stylish without wearing short shorts or a thong bikini...
btw the last part has nothing to do with white... Christian hetero men... in pretty much all cultures the less the woman wears the less respect she gets from men.. not saying its right but its the truth..
also outside of the "its hot" argument every point you said for reasons women wear clothes like that.. point to getting attention... but you cant dress like that and want attention but get mad at the attention you get... -
BackInWhite wrote: »? that ?
I hope she poisons that light skinned ?
I hope riley hair fall out
? them as a family, unit, group of people, TEAM
? em
[All that hate meanwhile The Curry household is
I've been waiting to see that Willie Dynamite gif -
damobb2deep wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »Ita a fair assessment. If someone tells you or acts like there is only one way to behave and act to be worthy of respect then you would be offended too.
The problem is here is she isn't doing the judging. She is being pointed out as a standard and folks reject that standard. Ain't ? wrong with that. Yall complain if you think a ? should only dress and behave a certain way to be worthy of respect.
Yep
It’s intertwined with the politics of respectability
Her persona is being used as another opportunity for the basement dwellers to attack any woman who isn’t buttoned up, any woman who has an overtly sexy image, and any woman who doesn’t meet the measurement for “wifeability" or better yet respect gets the “we need more women like Ayesha”
Which is obviously problematic
And it is dangerous for the women who are being attacked for not “living up” to an ideal I'm sure they never declared any allegiance to in the first place
Now she is catching some of the blow back
Her initial tweets that started this whole thing about being covered up were a lil problematic as well, so she isn't exactly innocent. In a roundabout way she insinuated that women who dress a certain way are doing it for the wrong reasons, as if women don't have other reasons besides the male gaze to prefer a certain style of clothing
It's unfortunate, but she'll survive
honest question why do women wear things like thong bikinis... short shorts... and high cut skirts... for other than male attention.
Lol
Women, like men, often dress according to fashion. So maybe she may just want to be trendy and stylish
We love our bodies. And like the way it makes our bodies look
Or maybe because it's hot
For the sake of knowing most other women you know wouldn't be able to pull the same outfit off
Not as if there is anything wrong with a heterosexual woman seeking male attention- feeling desirable and attractive feels good
There are other ways to gain a man's attention. What we choose to wear is just one way
Same as when a man dresses a certain way, or puts on cologne, or buys a particular car to attract women
If me simply wearing a thong bikini provokes a man into groping me or calling me out my name that is out of my control and should reflect poorly upon him
All this talk of what should be considered respectable is just another way to police and govern over anyone who doesn't adhere to the traditional values of white, Christian, hetero men
but you can be trendy and stylish without wearing short shorts or a thong bikini...
btw the last part has nothing to do with white... Christian hetero men... in pretty much all cultures the less the woman wears the less respect she gets from men.. not saying its right but its the truth..
also outside of the "its hot" argument every point you said for reasons women wear clothes like that.. point to getting attention... but you cant dress like that and want attention but get mad at the attention you get...
Attention is one thing, but disrespect is another
And in many cultures around the world the women walk around basically nude
Go to some remote villages in Africa, the women are basically nude
-
You can waste your time all you want getting into the (inconsequential) "particulars"
but the the dudes out here ridiculing and scrutinizing Russell & Ciara's union are essentially no different from the females who are ridiculing and scrutinizing Ayesha Curry
The fact is you have black people doing something positive that are getting negative feedback by other black people......who are trying to justify that negative feedback
Once again, you aren't making sense and the situations are completely different
Ciara is a bird with baggage from Atlanta that lucked up on a guy WAY OUT OF HER LEAGUE. She's forcing her own personal baggage onto a man who is LITERALLY too good for her.
She has future Hall of Famer Russell Wilson playing daddy to another man's kid bringing both of them in front of cameras, all while she's not even ? him. That's not "trying to do the right thing", that's hitting a ? lick, use your brain
Steph Curry's wife seems like she's of a MUCH higher caliber than SuperFuture's baby momma Ciara, a female who hops from celebrity male to celebrity male based on how poppin' they are at the time
Ciara chased (? ? )50 Cent around for YEARS while that ? was making fun of her to other people. She's a fame-hungry attention ?
But females with baggage love her because she represents the fantasy/goal for females with baggage: make bad decisions and then get a high quality male to help them carry the burden of those bad decisions, which is very unfair to the male involved(Russell Wilson)
Ayesha Curry >>>>>>>>>>Baggage-having bird Ciara
Should I keep going?
-
desertrain10 wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »Ita a fair assessment. If someone tells you or acts like there is only one way to behave and act to be worthy of respect then you would be offended too.
The problem is here is she isn't doing the judging. She is being pointed out as a standard and folks reject that standard. Ain't ? wrong with that. Yall complain if you think a ? should only dress and behave a certain way to be worthy of respect.
Yep
It’s intertwined with the politics of respectability
Her persona is being used as another opportunity for the basement dwellers to attack any woman who isn’t buttoned up, any woman who has an overtly sexy image, and any woman who doesn’t meet the measurement for “wifeability" or better yet respect gets the “we need more women like Ayesha”
Which is obviously problematic
And it is dangerous for the women who are being attacked for not “living up” to an ideal I'm sure they never declared any allegiance to in the first place
Now she is catching some of the blow back
Her initial tweets that started this whole thing about being covered up were a lil problematic as well, so she isn't exactly innocent. In a roundabout way she insinuated that women who dress a certain way are doing it for the wrong reasons, as if women don't have other reasons besides the male gaze to prefer a certain style of clothing
It's unfortunate, but she'll survive
honest question why do women wear things like thong bikinis... short shorts... and high cut skirts... for other than male attention.
Lol
Women, like men, often dress according to fashion. So maybe she may just want to be trendy and stylish
We love our bodies. And like the way it makes our bodies look
Or maybe because it's hot
For the sake of knowing most other women you know wouldn't be able to pull the same outfit off
Not as if there is anything wrong with a heterosexual woman seeking male attention- feeling desirable and attractive feels good
There are other ways to gain a man's attention. What we choose to wear is just one way
Same as when a man dresses a certain way, or puts on cologne, or buys a particular car to attract women
If me simply wearing a thong bikini provokes a man into groping me or calling me out my name that is out of my control and should reflect poorly upon him
All this talk of what should be considered respectable is just another way to police and govern over anyone who doesn't adhere to the traditional values of white, Christian, hetero men
but you can be trendy and stylish without wearing short shorts or a thong bikini...
btw the last part has nothing to do with white... Christian hetero men... in pretty much all cultures the less the woman wears the less respect she gets from men.. not saying its right but its the truth..
also outside of the "its hot" argument every point you said for reasons women wear clothes like that.. point to getting attention... but you cant dress like that and want attention but get mad at the attention you get...
Attention is one thing, but disrespect is another
And in many cultures around the world the women walk around basically nude
Go to some remote villages in Africa, the women are basically nude
its only "disrespect" if the woman is not feeling the dude that is giving her that attention... because if she feeling said dude he can hug her and grab her ass and guess what she wont care.. but let a dude she dont like say "damn you thick" he "thirsty" and "disrespectful" -
desertrain10 wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »Ita a fair assessment. If someone tells you or acts like there is only one way to behave and act to be worthy of respect then you would be offended too.
The problem is here is she isn't doing the judging. She is being pointed out as a standard and folks reject that standard. Ain't ? wrong with that. Yall complain if you think a ? should only dress and behave a certain way to be worthy of respect.
Yep
It’s intertwined with the politics of respectability
Her persona is being used as another opportunity for the basement dwellers to attack any woman who isn’t buttoned up, any woman who has an overtly sexy image, and any woman who doesn’t meet the measurement for “wifeability" or better yet respect gets the “we need more women like Ayesha”
Which is obviously problematic
And it is dangerous for the women who are being attacked for not “living up” to an ideal I'm sure they never declared any allegiance to in the first place
Now she is catching some of the blow back
Her initial tweets that started this whole thing about being covered up were a lil problematic as well, so she isn't exactly innocent. In a roundabout way she insinuated that women who dress a certain way are doing it for the wrong reasons, as if women don't have other reasons besides the male gaze to prefer a certain style of clothing
It's unfortunate, but she'll survive
honest question why do women wear things like thong bikinis... short shorts... and high cut skirts... for other than male attention.
Lol
Women, like men, often dress according to fashion. So maybe she may just want to be trendy and stylish
We love our bodies. And like the way it makes our bodies look
Or maybe because it's hot
For the sake of knowing most other women you know wouldn't be able to pull the same outfit off
Not as if there is anything wrong with a heterosexual woman seeking male attention- feeling desirable and attractive feels good
There are other ways to gain a man's attention. What we choose to wear is just one way
Same as when a man dresses a certain way, or puts on cologne, or buys a particular car to attract women
If me simply wearing a thong bikini provokes a man into groping me or calling me out my name that is out of my control and should reflect poorly upon him
All this talk of what should be considered respectable is just another way to police and govern over anyone who doesn't adhere to the traditional values of white, Christian, hetero men
but you can be trendy and stylish without wearing short shorts or a thong bikini...
btw the last part has nothing to do with white... Christian hetero men... in pretty much all cultures the less the woman wears the less respect she gets from men.. not saying its right but its the truth..
also outside of the "its hot" argument every point you said for reasons women wear clothes like that.. point to getting attention... but you cant dress like that and want attention but get mad at the attention you get...
Attention is one thing, but disrespect is another
And in many cultures around the world the women walk around basically nude
Go to some remote villages in Africa, the women are basically nude
This is not Africa and i think people have had enough you sick perverted feminist trying to change the culture to suit your whims -
It's projecting, simple as that. I thought feminism was about women being able to choose their own lives...
If she decides not to look and act like a woman who is dressing and acting for attention... Why is she wrong? -
You can waste your time all you want getting into the (inconsequential) "particulars"
but the the dudes out here ridiculing and scrutinizing Russell & Ciara's union are essentially no different from the females who are ridiculing and scrutinizing Ayesha Curry
The fact is you have black people doing something positive that are getting negative feedback by other black people......who are trying to justify that negative feedback
Once again, you aren't making sense and the situations are completely different
Ciara is a bird with baggage from Atlanta that lucked up on a guy WAY OUT OF HER LEAGUE. She's forcing her own personal baggage onto a man who is LITERALLY too good for her.
She has future Hall of Famer Russell Wilson playing daddy to another man's kid bringing both of them in front of cameras, all while she's not even ? him. That's not "trying to do the right thing", that's hitting a ? lick, use your brain
Steph Curry's wife seems like she's of a MUCH higher caliber than SuperFuture's baby momma Ciara, a female who hops from celebrity male to celebrity male based on how poppin' they are at the time
Ciara chased (? ? )50 Cent around for YEARS while that ? was making fun of her to other people. She's a fame-hungry attention ?
But females with baggage love her because she represents the fantasy/goal for females with baggage: make bad decisions and then get a high quality male to help them carry the burden of those bad decisions, which is very unfair to the male involved(Russell Wilson)
Ayesha Curry >>>>>>>>>>Baggage-having bird Ciara
Should I keep going?
Didn't somebody say in the Ciara/Russell thread that nobody was saying the bold? That's some sad ? ... -
desertrain10 wrote: »Ita a fair assessment. If someone tells you or acts like there is only one way to behave and act to be worthy of respect then you would be offended too.
The problem is here is she isn't doing the judging. She is being pointed out as a standard and folks reject that standard. Ain't ? wrong with that. Yall complain if you think a ? should only dress and behave a certain way to be worthy of respect.
Yep
It’s intertwined with the politics of respectability
Her persona is being used as another opportunity for the basement dwellers to attack any woman who isn’t buttoned up, any woman who has an overtly sexy image, and any woman who doesn’t meet the measurement for “wifeability" or better yet respect gets the “we need more women like Ayesha”
Which is obviously problematic
And it is dangerous for the women who are being attacked for not “living up” to an ideal I'm sure they never declared any allegiance to in the first place
Now she is catching some of the blow back
Her initial tweets that started this whole thing about being covered up were a lil problematic as well, so she isn't exactly innocent. In a roundabout way she insinuated that women who dress a certain way are doing it for the wrong reasons, as if women don't have other reasons besides the male gaze to prefer a certain style of clothing
It's unfortunate, but she'll survive
That's not her fault though. She didn't say that, other people put that image of being the standard onto her. People coming at her personally for some ? she didn't do, say, or ask for. That's why people say those who got negative things to say are projecting their own insecurities onto a person who don't got ? to do with how they feel. If somebody simply living their life can make you not like them, you're the problem.
Her initial tweets weren't even that bad, people just made more of them than what they were on some hit dog will holler ? . People want her to be the stereotype of an athlete's wife so bad and the fact that she's not ? some people off.
Yes, she doesn't deserve a lot of the personal attacks
But if we are being honest, while her comments were not atypical of many Christian women, they were really unnecessary
They were also self congratulating and judgemental
The type that usually invoke a strong reaction, one way or another
-
desertrain10 wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »Ita a fair assessment. If someone tells you or acts like there is only one way to behave and act to be worthy of respect then you would be offended too.
The problem is here is she isn't doing the judging. She is being pointed out as a standard and folks reject that standard. Ain't ? wrong with that. Yall complain if you think a ? should only dress and behave a certain way to be worthy of respect.
Yep
It’s intertwined with the politics of respectability
Her persona is being used as another opportunity for the basement dwellers to attack any woman who isn’t buttoned up, any woman who has an overtly sexy image, and any woman who doesn’t meet the measurement for “wifeability" or better yet respect gets the “we need more women like Ayesha”
Which is obviously problematic
And it is dangerous for the women who are being attacked for not “living up” to an ideal I'm sure they never declared any allegiance to in the first place
Now she is catching some of the blow back
Her initial tweets that started this whole thing about being covered up were a lil problematic as well, so she isn't exactly innocent. In a roundabout way she insinuated that women who dress a certain way are doing it for the wrong reasons, as if women don't have other reasons besides the male gaze to prefer a certain style of clothing
It's unfortunate, but she'll survive
That's not her fault though. She didn't say that, other people put that image of being the standard onto her. People coming at her personally for some ? she didn't do, say, or ask for. That's why people say those who got negative things to say are projecting their own insecurities onto a person who don't got ? to do with how they feel. If somebody simply living their life can make you not like them, you're the problem.
Her initial tweets weren't even that bad, people just made more of them than what they were on some hit dog will holler ? . People want her to be the stereotype of an athlete's wife so bad and the fact that she's not ? some people off.
Yes, she doesn't deserve a lot of the negative attention
She just got caught in the crossfire
And if we are being honest, while her comments were not atypical of many Christian women, they were really unnecessary
They were also self congratulating and judgemental
The type that usually invoke a strong reaction
U are a female right? -
You can waste your time all you want getting into the (inconsequential) "particulars"
but the the dudes out here ridiculing and scrutinizing Russell & Ciara's union are essentially no different from the females who are ridiculing and scrutinizing Ayesha Curry
The fact is you have black people doing something positive that are getting negative feedback by other black people......who are trying to justify that negative feedback
Once again, you aren't making sense and the situations are completely different
Ciara is a bird with baggage from Atlanta that lucked up on a guy WAY OUT OF HER LEAGUE. She's forcing her own personal baggage onto a man who is LITERALLY too good for her.
She has future Hall of Famer Russell Wilson playing daddy to another man's kid bringing both of them in front of cameras, all while she's not even ? him. That's not "trying to do the right thing", that's hitting a ? lick, use your brain
Steph Curry's wife seems like she's of a MUCH higher caliber than SuperFuture's baby momma Ciara, a female who hops from celebrity male to celebrity male based on how poppin' they are at the time
Ciara chased (? ? )50 Cent around for YEARS while that ? was making fun of her to other people. She's a fame-hungry attention ?
But females with baggage love her because she represents the fantasy/goal for females with baggage: make bad decisions and then get a high quality male to help them carry the burden of those bad decisions, which is very unfair to the male involved(Russell Wilson)
Ayesha Curry >>>>>>>>>>Baggage-having bird Ciara
Should I keep going?
Didn't somebody say in the Ciara/Russell thread that nobody was saying the bold? That's some sad ? ...
It's taken all of my restraint to dodge that Russell Wilson engagement thread but you ? keep bumping it lol
I haven't even clicked on it yet because I know that if I do click on that thread I'm gonna explode it -
"Hating hoes ain't happy
And happy hoes ain't hatin'
Better check the situation"
Lol @ analyzing the thought processes and opinions of a ? . ? 's on twitter at that. I ain't met one ? satisfied with her own ? that hate on ol' girl.
-
king hassan wrote: »BackInWhite wrote: »? that ?
I hope she poisons that light skinned ?
I hope riley hair fall out
? them as a family, unit, group of people, TEAM
? em
[All that hate meanwhile The Curry household is
I've been waiting to see that Willie Dynamite gif
Always on deck when needed brotha man lol -
damobb2deep wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »Ita a fair assessment. If someone tells you or acts like there is only one way to behave and act to be worthy of respect then you would be offended too.
The problem is here is she isn't doing the judging. She is being pointed out as a standard and folks reject that standard. Ain't ? wrong with that. Yall complain if you think a ? should only dress and behave a certain way to be worthy of respect.
Yep
It’s intertwined with the politics of respectability
Her persona is being used as another opportunity for the basement dwellers to attack any woman who isn’t buttoned up, any woman who has an overtly sexy image, and any woman who doesn’t meet the measurement for “wifeability" or better yet respect gets the “we need more women like Ayesha”
Which is obviously problematic
And it is dangerous for the women who are being attacked for not “living up” to an ideal I'm sure they never declared any allegiance to in the first place
Now she is catching some of the blow back
Her initial tweets that started this whole thing about being covered up were a lil problematic as well, so she isn't exactly innocent. In a roundabout way she insinuated that women who dress a certain way are doing it for the wrong reasons, as if women don't have other reasons besides the male gaze to prefer a certain style of clothing
It's unfortunate, but she'll survive
honest question why do women wear things like thong bikinis... short shorts... and high cut skirts... for other than male attention.
Lol
Women, like men, often dress according to fashion. So maybe she may just want to be trendy and stylish
We love our bodies. And like the way it makes our bodies look
Or maybe because it's hot
For the sake of knowing most other women you know wouldn't be able to pull the same outfit off
Not as if there is anything wrong with a heterosexual woman seeking male attention- feeling desirable and attractive feels good
There are other ways to gain a man's attention. What we choose to wear is just one way
Same as when a man dresses a certain way, or puts on cologne, or buys a particular car to attract women
If me simply wearing a thong bikini provokes a man into groping me or calling me out my name that is out of my control and should reflect poorly upon him
All this talk of what should be considered respectable is just another way to police and govern over anyone who doesn't adhere to the traditional values of white, Christian, hetero men
but you can be trendy and stylish without wearing short shorts or a thong bikini...
btw the last part has nothing to do with white... Christian hetero men... in pretty much all cultures the less the woman wears the less respect she gets from men.. not saying its right but its the truth..
also outside of the "its hot" argument every point you said for reasons women wear clothes like that.. point to getting attention... but you cant dress like that and want attention but get mad at the attention you get...
Attention is one thing, but disrespect is another
And in many cultures around the world the women walk around basically nude
Go to some remote villages in Africa, the women are basically nude
its only "disrespect" if the woman is not feeling the dude that is giving her that attention... because if she feeling said dude he can hug her and grab her ass and guess what she wont care.. but let a dude she dont like say "damn you thick" he "thirsty" and "disrespectful"
Lol
No matter how you wanna spin it
Name calling, groping without permission in most cases is generally considered rude and disrespectful
That's why these behaviors tend to be reserved for "thots", a.k.a. women who are engaging in what one would consider largely undesirable behavior
-
You can waste your time all you want getting into the (inconsequential) "particulars"
but the the dudes out here ridiculing and scrutinizing Russell & Ciara's union are essentially no different from the females who are ridiculing and scrutinizing Ayesha Curry
The fact is you have black people doing something positive that are getting negative feedback by other black people......who are trying to justify that negative feedback
Once again, you aren't making sense and the situations are completely different
Ciara is a bird with baggage from Atlanta that lucked up on a guy WAY OUT OF HER LEAGUE. She's forcing her own personal baggage onto a man who is LITERALLY too good for her.
She has future Hall of Famer Russell Wilson playing daddy to another man's kid bringing both of them in front of cameras, all while she's not even ? him. That's not "trying to do the right thing", that's hitting a ? lick, use your brain
-
desertrain10 wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »Ita a fair assessment. If someone tells you or acts like there is only one way to behave and act to be worthy of respect then you would be offended too.
The problem is here is she isn't doing the judging. She is being pointed out as a standard and folks reject that standard. Ain't ? wrong with that. Yall complain if you think a ? should only dress and behave a certain way to be worthy of respect.
Yep
It’s intertwined with the politics of respectability
Her persona is being used as another opportunity for the basement dwellers to attack any woman who isn’t buttoned up, any woman who has an overtly sexy image, and any woman who doesn’t meet the measurement for “wifeability" or better yet respect gets the “we need more women like Ayesha”
Which is obviously problematic
And it is dangerous for the women who are being attacked for not “living up” to an ideal I'm sure they never declared any allegiance to in the first place
Now she is catching some of the blow back
Her initial tweets that started this whole thing about being covered up were a lil problematic as well, so she isn't exactly innocent. In a roundabout way she insinuated that women who dress a certain way are doing it for the wrong reasons, as if women don't have other reasons besides the male gaze to prefer a certain style of clothing
It's unfortunate, but she'll survive
That's not her fault though. She didn't say that, other people put that image of being the standard onto her. People coming at her personally for some ? she didn't do, say, or ask for. That's why people say those who got negative things to say are projecting their own insecurities onto a person who don't got ? to do with how they feel. If somebody simply living their life can make you not like them, you're the problem.
Her initial tweets weren't even that bad, people just made more of them than what they were on some hit dog will holler ? . People want her to be the stereotype of an athlete's wife so bad and the fact that she's not ? some people off.
Yes, she doesn't deserve a lot of the personal attacks
But if we are being honest, while her comments were not atypical of many Christian women, they were really unnecessary
They were also self congratulating and judgemental
The type that usually invoke a strong reaction, one way or another
No the ? they were not -
desertrain10 wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »Ita a fair assessment. If someone tells you or acts like there is only one way to behave and act to be worthy of respect then you would be offended too.
The problem is here is she isn't doing the judging. She is being pointed out as a standard and folks reject that standard. Ain't ? wrong with that. Yall complain if you think a ? should only dress and behave a certain way to be worthy of respect.
Yep
It’s intertwined with the politics of respectability
Her persona is being used as another opportunity for the basement dwellers to attack any woman who isn’t buttoned up, any woman who has an overtly sexy image, and any woman who doesn’t meet the measurement for “wifeability" or better yet respect gets the “we need more women like Ayesha”
Which is obviously problematic
And it is dangerous for the women who are being attacked for not “living up” to an ideal I'm sure they never declared any allegiance to in the first place
Now she is catching some of the blow back
Her initial tweets that started this whole thing about being covered up were a lil problematic as well, so she isn't exactly innocent. In a roundabout way she insinuated that women who dress a certain way are doing it for the wrong reasons, as if women don't have other reasons besides the male gaze to prefer a certain style of clothing
It's unfortunate, but she'll survive
honest question why do women wear things like thong bikinis... short shorts... and high cut skirts... for other than male attention.
Lol
Women, like men, often dress according to fashion. So maybe she may just want to be trendy and stylish
We love our bodies. And like the way it makes our bodies look
Or maybe because it's hot
For the sake of knowing most other women you know wouldn't be able to pull the same outfit off
Not as if there is anything wrong with a heterosexual woman seeking male attention- feeling desirable and attractive feels good
There are other ways to gain a man's attention. What we choose to wear is just one way
Same as when a man dresses a certain way, or puts on cologne, or buys a particular car to attract women
If me simply wearing a thong bikini provokes a man into groping me or calling me out my name that is out of my control and should reflect poorly upon him
All this talk of what should be considered respectable is just another way to police and govern over anyone who doesn't adhere to the traditional values of white, Christian, hetero men
Yea...I remember the last time a chick's Vera ? perfume and Honda Civic made me wanna ? . -
desertrain10 wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »Ita a fair assessment. If someone tells you or acts like there is only one way to behave and act to be worthy of respect then you would be offended too.
The problem is here is she isn't doing the judging. She is being pointed out as a standard and folks reject that standard. Ain't ? wrong with that. Yall complain if you think a ? should only dress and behave a certain way to be worthy of respect.
Yep
It’s intertwined with the politics of respectability
Her persona is being used as another opportunity for the basement dwellers to attack any woman who isn’t buttoned up, any woman who has an overtly sexy image, and any woman who doesn’t meet the measurement for “wifeability" or better yet respect gets the “we need more women like Ayesha”
Which is obviously problematic
And it is dangerous for the women who are being attacked for not “living up” to an ideal I'm sure they never declared any allegiance to in the first place
Now she is catching some of the blow back
Her initial tweets that started this whole thing about being covered up were a lil problematic as well, so she isn't exactly innocent. In a roundabout way she insinuated that women who dress a certain way are doing it for the wrong reasons, as if women don't have other reasons besides the male gaze to prefer a certain style of clothing
It's unfortunate, but she'll survive
That's not her fault though. She didn't say that, other people put that image of being the standard onto her. People coming at her personally for some ? she didn't do, say, or ask for. That's why people say those who got negative things to say are projecting their own insecurities onto a person who don't got ? to do with how they feel. If somebody simply living their life can make you not like them, you're the problem.
Her initial tweets weren't even that bad, people just made more of them than what they were on some hit dog will holler ? . People want her to be the stereotype of an athlete's wife so bad and the fact that she's not ? some people off.
Yes, she doesn't deserve a lot of the personal attacks
But if we are being honest, while her comments were not atypical of many Christian women, they were really unnecessary
They were also self congratulating and judgemental
The type that usually invoke a strong reaction, one way or another
in the words of Rev. Run... "dress like you want to be addressed" -
desertrain10 wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »damobb2deep wrote: »desertrain10 wrote: »Ita a fair assessment. If someone tells you or acts like there is only one way to behave and act to be worthy of respect then you would be offended too.
The problem is here is she isn't doing the judging. She is being pointed out as a standard and folks reject that standard. Ain't ? wrong with that. Yall complain if you think a ? should only dress and behave a certain way to be worthy of respect.
Yep
It’s intertwined with the politics of respectability
Her persona is being used as another opportunity for the basement dwellers to attack any woman who isn’t buttoned up, any woman who has an overtly sexy image, and any woman who doesn’t meet the measurement for “wifeability" or better yet respect gets the “we need more women like Ayesha”
Which is obviously problematic
And it is dangerous for the women who are being attacked for not “living up” to an ideal I'm sure they never declared any allegiance to in the first place
Now she is catching some of the blow back
Her initial tweets that started this whole thing about being covered up were a lil problematic as well, so she isn't exactly innocent. In a roundabout way she insinuated that women who dress a certain way are doing it for the wrong reasons, as if women don't have other reasons besides the male gaze to prefer a certain style of clothing
It's unfortunate, but she'll survive
honest question why do women wear things like thong bikinis... short shorts... and high cut skirts... for other than male attention.
Lol
Women, like men, often dress according to fashion. So maybe she may just want to be trendy and stylish
We love our bodies. And like the way it makes our bodies look
Or maybe because it's hot
For the sake of knowing most other women you know wouldn't be able to pull the same outfit off
Not as if there is anything wrong with a heterosexual woman seeking male attention- feeling desirable and attractive feels good
There are other ways to gain a man's attention. What we choose to wear is just one way
Same as when a man dresses a certain way, or puts on cologne, or buys a particular car to attract women
If me simply wearing a thong bikini provokes a man into groping me or calling me out my name that is out of my control and should reflect poorly upon him
All this talk of what should be considered respectable is just another way to police and govern over anyone who doesn't adhere to the traditional values of white, Christian, hetero men
but you can be trendy and stylish without wearing short shorts or a thong bikini...
btw the last part has nothing to do with white... Christian hetero men... in pretty much all cultures the less the woman wears the less respect she gets from men.. not saying its right but its the truth..
also outside of the "its hot" argument every point you said for reasons women wear clothes like that.. point to getting attention... but you cant dress like that and want attention but get mad at the attention you get...
Attention is one thing, but disrespect is another
And in many cultures around the world the women walk around basically nude
Go to some remote villages in Africa, the women are basically nude
its only "disrespect" if the woman is not feeling the dude that is giving her that attention... because if she feeling said dude he can hug her and grab her ass and guess what she wont care.. but let a dude she dont like say "damn you thick" he "thirsty" and "disrespectful"
Lol
No matter how you wanna spin it
Name calling, groping without permission in most cases is generally considered rude and disrespectful
That's why these behaviors tend to be reserved for "thots", a.k.a. women who are engaging in what one would consider largely undesirable behavior
thats why if you dont want that particular type of attention not to act... or dress like that..
