Amy schumer tweets black men more likely to street harass you. !@#$% WHAT!?
Options
Comments
-
Black men aggressive as ? in the streets.
That being said, any dude "catcalling" that broad should be ashamed of themselves. -
? in here writing paragraphs and books trynna prove points
amy and emily built like a bag of potato chips -
nah real talk tho ? be gassin these hoes
-
MazterChef wrote: »nah real talk tho ? be gassin these hoes
Who are these ? ? Ya'll keep saying this anytime a white woman is mentioned yet rarely produce any names outside of a couple to say "so many" black dudes hype these women up. -
He gets mad when you call him a ? he definitely is -
Nah, I'm gonna keep believing a talented one is white. Ain't no way in hell he's black -
MazterChef wrote: »nah real talk tho ? be gassin these hoes
Who are these ? ? Ya'll keep saying this anytime a white woman is mentioned yet rarely produce any names outside of a couple to say "so many" black dudes hype these women up.
bruh you can win an argument on the internet and get a bunch of co-signs but it dont change reality in the REAL WORLD.
Facts is if this woman were to walk through brooklyn she would get a fair amount of attention from dudes, you and i wont holla but dudes would. We also look at this chick in context we know shes an annoying comic and an attention ? but if she walks through a black neighborhood with leggings she'll get approached alot.
-
MazterChef wrote: »MazterChef wrote: »nah real talk tho ? be gassin these hoes
Who are these ? ? Ya'll keep saying this anytime a white woman is mentioned yet rarely produce any names outside of a couple to say "so many" black dudes hype these women up.
bruh you can win an argument on the internet and get a bunch of co-signs but it dont change reality in the REAL WORLD.
Facts is if this woman were to walk through brooklyn she would get a fair amount of attention from dudes, you and i wont holla but dudes would. We also look at this chick in context we know shes an annoying comic and an attention ? but if she walks through a black neighborhood with leggings she'll get approached alot.
True.
The black dudes that are hollering at her probably don't even know who she is.
They're just trying to get at her because she's a fat white chick who looks like she'd be interested in black men.
Probably based on past experience more than anything.
Basically, ? have hollered at better looking fat white chicks........and assume she's an easy mark because she doesn't look as good as the fat white women they've had success with. -
Built 4 cuban linx wrote: »
He stays on that black women ain't ? cause they don't like me stuff sounds like a cornball brotha to me. Sucka -
MazterChef wrote: »MazterChef wrote: »nah real talk tho ? be gassin these hoes
Who are these ? ? Ya'll keep saying this anytime a white woman is mentioned yet rarely produce any names outside of a couple to say "so many" black dudes hype these women up.
bruh you can win an argument on the internet and get a bunch of co-signs but it dont change reality in the REAL WORLD.
Facts is if this woman were to walk through brooklyn she would get a fair amount of attention from dudes, you and i wont holla but dudes would. We also look at this chick in context we know shes an annoying comic and an attention ? but if she walks through a black neighborhood with leggings she'll get approached alot.
That sound like men in general when they see something that look like an easy ? . Back in high school they used ? the ugliest and fattest chicks cause they put out faster. -
-
your white feminism gentlemen.
-
fortyacres wrote: »your white feminism gentlemen.
White feminists are some of the most racist ? out there. 90% of them are lesbians(though many in the closet), and they all think they're above everyone else intellectually. It's what Margaret ? spawned 100 years ago. We as black men are the last holdout for the ? agenda(though we're slippin fast) because we still embrace being masucline towards females and not simpin cucks. The first people to go after black athletes or celebs over allegations are........white feminists, never fails. But politically.....they need us for our numbers on election day. So they try to dance around ? on this "unity" tip. Note you don't see "unity" in the workplace, or social circles, its only for show. They preach socialist to fill the void not being with a man does to a single person's income. And of course push the female wage gap all the time....yet hardly here about the race wage gap which is far larger.
Note I'm not saying most white feminist are racist, but the movement was built on that premise. I think younger feminist aren't really on the tip much, though you have old hags in their ear. -
MazterChef wrote: »MazterChef wrote: »nah real talk tho ? be gassin these hoes
Who are these ? ? Ya'll keep saying this anytime a white woman is mentioned yet rarely produce any names outside of a couple to say "so many" black dudes hype these women up.
bruh you can win an argument on the internet and get a bunch of co-signs but it dont change reality in the REAL WORLD.
Facts is if this woman were to walk through brooklyn she would get a fair amount of attention from dudes, you and i wont holla but dudes would. We also look at this chick in context we know shes an annoying comic and an attention ? but if she walks through a black neighborhood with leggings she'll get approached alot.
That's women period though. Even the most homely looking broad can have a ? trying to smash. That don't mean the ? is being put on a pedestal. Just means some dudes think they can smash. Just because a dude says he'd ? don't mean there's value to her he sees other than her ? -
But y'all still chasin "snow bunnies"...... ? ain't ? but a sexual fetish to white women, after that y'all the devil. Stay woke or nah?
-
But y'all still chasin "snow bunnies"...... ? ain't ? but a sexual fetish to white women, after that y'all the devil. Stay woke or nah?
Plenty of straight white(latina, asian, etc.) women like black men because we're still masculine, unlike a good number of white men today. Everyone, male or female needs to always make sure who they with are with them for the right reasons, regardless. White lesbians stay hatin though -
5th Letter wrote: »
What's the point of bringing up "blacks commit more crime" (not that I agree with that) in a thread about a black person being senselessly killed by a race soldier?A Talented One wrote: »A Talented One wrote: »A Talented One wrote: »Black_Samson wrote: »A Talented One wrote: »Black_Samson wrote: »A Talented One wrote: »A Talented One wrote: »A Talented One wrote: »You ? idiots. The world is not how you want it to be. It just is how it is.
There is no reason why black men might not do this more often than white men. Black men are not the same as white men. Or Asian men.
And I am not even saying that she is definitely right. I am just saying that what she said can't be dismissed as racist right off the bat.
Let me add this to this.
Could it be that black culture is more permissive than white culture with respect to men hollering at women on the street -- is it less an issue in black culture than white culture?
It's possible; certainly, black and white culture are not the same.
Even if that is true, that doesn't necessarily mean that black men would be more likely to holler at women outside the culture (i.e. non-black women) than other men. They are, after all, not part of the culture.
Then again, it may be that the more permissiveness of the culture sipes out, and black men are more likely to holler at women in general as opposed to just black women.
I am not saying this is necessarily true. I am saying this one reason why it may be true.
To insist, dogmatically, that black men could not possibly do this more than white men is just not defensible.
This ? is correct. In many Afro-diasporic and African cultures, "hollering" is much more accepted
Of course many white women are so racist and self centered that they think any man especially black that as much as looks at her is trying to "sexual harrase" her
However saltines do it too; and Latin men are definitely the worst but the media paints it as only a black thing (see the street harassment video where they edited out the white men)
Just had to throw in a "? " in there, didn't you?
From the outside looking in...
I wouldn't knowingly twist a j in your vicinity.
You are too white washed.
Life aint like it is on base bruh.
What makes you say I'm too white washed? Can you explain?
The fact that you actually buy into the talking points you bring up each time whitey ? up.
The fact that you never let us have our moment without saying some stupid ? .
The fact that white posters have even called you out.
The fact the you think you are a voice of reason. When in actuality you are a voice of dissent.
You never like seeing us smile.
You assist in the perpetual rage on this site.
This is almost all wrong. You have not been paying close attention.
I will say one thing though. If y'all are saying some bs, I will register my dissent, as in this case and a few others. For the most part though, I am in agreement with most posters on the central questions of race.
Agreement with most??? Delusional ? you're known as the resident ? that always takes up for white people and says stupidass ? like agreeing with this dumb cac that has no proof of her claims.
Listen, you stupid ? , you don't know what you're talking about.
I have agreed with the anger over the police shootings, Kaepernick and many, many other issues. Look at my posts. I put more emphasis on racism than most posters, and I have no doubt that I more deeply invested in these racial issues than 99% of you fools. When Cleveland won the NBA championship, what struck me the most in that moment was the fact that that was the same city where they let Tamir's murders off, and I posted something to that effect. Even when I don't post, look at what I co-sign or GOAT.
But being pro-black -- and you will be hard-pressed to find someone more pro-black than I am -- to me doesn't include evading or denying cold hard facts. Recently I got in trouble for saying that we are more violent, judging by statistics of violent crime rates. This was in response to someone going around saying, "And they say we are more violent." No serious scholar denies that blacks commits more violent crime (other crimes yes, but not violent crimes); I even quoted Michelle Alexander to that effect. But you fools seem to want to wish away certain unpleasant realities.
I will say one thing though. A lot of times I am willing to just sit back and co-sign others. When I moved to actually post, it may disproportionately be in situations like this where I am taking a minority view. As a result, it may seem that I am more out of step than I actually am.
And I never said that what Schumer said is correct. I said that there is no reason in principle why one group of men (e.g. black men) may not holler at women more than other groups. To settle the issue, the matter should be studied.
Maybe i'm wrong, but it seems you bring certain things up in the wrong context. For instance, you may be right about crime statistics, but bringing that up at a time when people with badges commit crime and don't get convictions is the wrong move. Also, people only mentioning violent crimes, and not mentioning the history violence of white men, and their current ? for war and their body counts far exceeding ours in their many conflicts around the world makes it seem bringing up those facts disingenuous. It also dismisses the fact that blacks do talk about how to deal with the crime rate and point out a racist system that is cupable. You can't just mention one issue to discount the other. Even if percentage wise it's less, it's more dead people.
No, those are not the contexts in which I bring up violent crime rates. It's when a white person does something horrifyingly violent , and people post saying, "And they we are the violent ones." White violence does seem to be often overlooked, but there is no question that blacks do commit more violent crime. And since I am averse to people trying to deny the undeniable, I point that out. While, I should add, always being careful to mention just why I think we commit more violent crime (i.e. the disadvantaged communities we are more likely to live in, which is due to white oppression).
Cause dude was lying, and black people don't need to lie to advance the black cause. We can be 100% honest, and still have truth and justice on our side. -
Built 4 cuban linx wrote: »
He stays on that black women ain't ? cause they don't like me stuff sounds like a cornball brotha to me. Sucka
That's not really my complaint about them. It's that they stereotype black men. I have said it 50 times. -
Man, I ? on overweight white women all of the time for this very mindset. They're by far the most delusional hoes of all, because they've been gassed that much for a quick nut by lames that they think every ? is going to go crazy for them.
Cosign. I get tight as ? when these fat white ? just pull up on me in the club. ? happens every night and I only got 2 gears so it's hard to not be an ? about it. Worst is when you see em coming but they too big to dodge. I gotta act like I'm on the phone and ? or I gotta just stonewall em like those British royal guard ? and just look straight and not respond. The nerve of these ? 's these days is crazy. Bane of my existence. They won't break me. -
Black men aggressive as ? in the streets.
That being said, any dude "catcalling" that broad should be ashamed of themselves.
? are the ? worse, always implicating their own demise...GTFOHWTBS
when it comes to hollering at women, MEN are agressive in the streets not just blk men.
-
Nah big bro me and you usually on when it comes to black talk.
Ive never ever seen men of another race get busy with women like black men. Down here they pretty much pull em off the streets by their arm.
I understand bracing against the narrative, but it is what it is... -
But y'all still chasin "snow bunnies"...... ? ain't ? but a sexual fetish to white women, after that y'all the devil. Stay woke or nah?
You don't even have to get with white women sexually for them to get you caught up. Look at Chris Brown. -
A Talented One wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »
What's the point of bringing up "blacks commit more crime" (not that I agree with that) in a thread about a black person being senselessly killed by a race soldier?A Talented One wrote: »A Talented One wrote: »A Talented One wrote: »Black_Samson wrote: »A Talented One wrote: »Black_Samson wrote: »A Talented One wrote: »A Talented One wrote: »A Talented One wrote: »You ? idiots. The world is not how you want it to be. It just is how it is.
There is no reason why black men might not do this more often than white men. Black men are not the same as white men. Or Asian men.
And I am not even saying that she is definitely right. I am just saying that what she said can't be dismissed as racist right off the bat.
Let me add this to this.
Could it be that black culture is more permissive than white culture with respect to men hollering at women on the street -- is it less an issue in black culture than white culture?
It's possible; certainly, black and white culture are not the same.
Even if that is true, that doesn't necessarily mean that black men would be more likely to holler at women outside the culture (i.e. non-black women) than other men. They are, after all, not part of the culture.
Then again, it may be that the more permissiveness of the culture sipes out, and black men are more likely to holler at women in general as opposed to just black women.
I am not saying this is necessarily true. I am saying this one reason why it may be true.
To insist, dogmatically, that black men could not possibly do this more than white men is just not defensible.
This ? is correct. In many Afro-diasporic and African cultures, "hollering" is much more accepted
Of course many white women are so racist and self centered that they think any man especially black that as much as looks at her is trying to "sexual harrase" her
However saltines do it too; and Latin men are definitely the worst but the media paints it as only a black thing (see the street harassment video where they edited out the white men)
Just had to throw in a "? " in there, didn't you?
From the outside looking in...
I wouldn't knowingly twist a j in your vicinity.
You are too white washed.
Life aint like it is on base bruh.
What makes you say I'm too white washed? Can you explain?
The fact that you actually buy into the talking points you bring up each time whitey ? up.
The fact that you never let us have our moment without saying some stupid ? .
The fact that white posters have even called you out.
The fact the you think you are a voice of reason. When in actuality you are a voice of dissent.
You never like seeing us smile.
You assist in the perpetual rage on this site.
This is almost all wrong. You have not been paying close attention.
I will say one thing though. If y'all are saying some bs, I will register my dissent, as in this case and a few others. For the most part though, I am in agreement with most posters on the central questions of race.
Agreement with most??? Delusional ? you're known as the resident ? that always takes up for white people and says stupidass ? like agreeing with this dumb cac that has no proof of her claims.
Listen, you stupid ? , you don't know what you're talking about.
I have agreed with the anger over the police shootings, Kaepernick and many, many other issues. Look at my posts. I put more emphasis on racism than most posters, and I have no doubt that I more deeply invested in these racial issues than 99% of you fools. When Cleveland won the NBA championship, what struck me the most in that moment was the fact that that was the same city where they let Tamir's murders off, and I posted something to that effect. Even when I don't post, look at what I co-sign or GOAT.
But being pro-black -- and you will be hard-pressed to find someone more pro-black than I am -- to me doesn't include evading or denying cold hard facts. Recently I got in trouble for saying that we are more violent, judging by statistics of violent crime rates. This was in response to someone going around saying, "And they say we are more violent." No serious scholar denies that blacks commits more violent crime (other crimes yes, but not violent crimes); I even quoted Michelle Alexander to that effect. But you fools seem to want to wish away certain unpleasant realities.
I will say one thing though. A lot of times I am willing to just sit back and co-sign others. When I moved to actually post, it may disproportionately be in situations like this where I am taking a minority view. As a result, it may seem that I am more out of step than I actually am.
And I never said that what Schumer said is correct. I said that there is no reason in principle why one group of men (e.g. black men) may not holler at women more than other groups. To settle the issue, the matter should be studied.
Maybe i'm wrong, but it seems you bring certain things up in the wrong context. For instance, you may be right about crime statistics, but bringing that up at a time when people with badges commit crime and don't get convictions is the wrong move. Also, people only mentioning violent crimes, and not mentioning the history violence of white men, and their current ? for war and their body counts far exceeding ours in their many conflicts around the world makes it seem bringing up those facts disingenuous. It also dismisses the fact that blacks do talk about how to deal with the crime rate and point out a racist system that is cupable. You can't just mention one issue to discount the other. Even if percentage wise it's less, it's more dead people.
No, those are not the contexts in which I bring up violent crime rates. It's when a white person does something horrifyingly violent , and people post saying, "And they we are the violent ones." White violence does seem to be often overlooked, but there is no question that blacks do commit more violent crime. And since I am averse to people trying to deny the undeniable, I point that out. While, I should add, always being careful to mention just why I think we commit more violent crime (i.e. the disadvantaged communities we are more likely to live in, which is due to white oppression).
Cause dude was lying, and black people don't need to lie to advance the black cause. We can be 100% honest, and still have truth and justice on our side.
That's the problem your "being honest" is not actual truth. It makes you sound like a white supremacist. -
MazterChef wrote: »MazterChef wrote: »nah real talk tho ? be gassin these hoes
Who are these ? ? Ya'll keep saying this anytime a white woman is mentioned yet rarely produce any names outside of a couple to say "so many" black dudes hype these women up.
bruh you can win an argument on the internet and get a bunch of co-signs but it dont change reality in the REAL WORLD.
Facts is if this woman were to walk through brooklyn she would get a fair amount of attention from dudes, you and i wont holla but dudes would. We also look at this chick in context we know shes an annoying comic and an attention ? but if she walks through a black neighborhood with leggings she'll get approached alot.
That's women period though. Even the most homely looking broad can have a ? trying to smash. That don't mean the ? is being put on a pedestal. Just means some dudes think they can smash. Just because a dude says he'd ? don't mean there's value to her he sees other than her ?
Amy schumer tweets black men more likely to street harass you. -
Nah big bro me and you usually on when it comes to black talk.
Ive never ever seen men of another race get busy with women like black men. Down here they pretty much pull em off the streets by their arm.
I understand bracing against the narrative, but it is what it is...
Where im from, i have.
