Kanye West has officially gone full-on ? .. Kanye has meeting with Adolf Trump...
Options
Comments
-
Did Bernie Sanders
"Lock up black PEOPLE" too
Is Charles Roberts also guilty of
"Sending us all to wars"
To how many people does this "pick a random political figure and categorically blame them for historical events, in a vaccum" Logic apply to?
Clearly you're asking yourself this because you literally just picked random political figures and blamed them for historical events
I posted historical fact -
universalside wrote: »universalside wrote: »? what??
What black people are you talking about
Why can't you make a post without a weak insult included in it simpleton?
These black people, you ? white boy.
Hillary Clinton leading a 1968 student protest to increase African-American admissions at Wellesley College, following the assassination of Martin Luther King. Clinton met King in Chicago in 1962, when she was 14.
How is the weather in Russia?
You said she helped black people AS A LAWYER
Why would you post a pic of her as a student taking part in a student protest? What does that have to do with her helping black people as a lawyer?
What court cases did she win for black people? Serious question
In 1972, just a few months before she graduated, Marian sent Hillary to gather data on school segregation. Hillary went undercover, investigating whether private schools in different cities across the South were discriminating against black students.
-
Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »On a more positive note, just read somewhere that Trump is in favor of expanding stop and frisk to " urban" areas.....
They gonna ignore this tho.
Just like they gonna ignore that he still advocates the death penalty for those 5 Black and Latino boys (now men who spent years in jail) who were vindicated, by DNA, of the Central Park ? .
And they're going to ignore his tight ties to racist MFs like Giuliani etc...
But mention Killary / Email / PizzaGate / Super-Predator, and these MFs could go on for days.
Ignore what?? The ? that's already happening now??
I've been asking you ? how ? can get any worse outside of chattel slavery and you ? STILL CANNOT GIVE ME A STRAIGHT ANSWER smh
If you ask that question, then you might as well be the one saying "It can't get any worse for Black people".
And by the way, that question was answered numerous times - one example was nationwide stop and frisk. And I don't remember you having a "straight-answer" response to that. Something along the lines of "how is that not happening already ?" which was explained by another poster who clarified what it meant to have this implemented nationwide and have a commander in chief who strongly supports the police even when they're wrong.
Besides stop and frisk, the police are asking for whatever military surplus weapons they were barred from getting recently under the Obama administration (who likely gave them some in the first place, but also barred them from some).
What do you think Mr. "Law and Order" president, who was endorsed by the fraternal order of pigs, will do - probably give them the damn weapons... to ? more Black people. -
blackamerica wrote: »I hate when ppl offer rebuttals with weak blanket statements fam.
Blanket statement? I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on that. My apologies, I thought my point was already obvious and self-evident.blackamerica wrote: »Exaggerated?
Yes.blackamerica wrote: »Trump is a RACIST who used dangerous racist rehortric against black folk and others. He's given white supremacists hope they can take america back. He has a HISTORY of racist behavior.
Trump is a racist who has used racist rhetoric? I obviously don't doubt that. He's on a long list of ignorant and privileged Americans who have racist tendencies.
He's given white supremacists hope? Yes, I agree. But if your argument is that this makes him a white supremacist, which many people have argued, then I disagree for reasons I hope are already obvious. In short, that's bad logic.
But my original response wasn't even mostly directed toward this.blackamerica wrote: »Now which part of anything I just posted is "exaggerated"?
My original response was directed not toward what you just posted but what you originally posted.
As previously stated, your "open white supremacist" claim sounds hyperbolic and inaccurate, especially considering how others have ran with it, even comparing Trump to ? , which is a disservice to how terrible ? truly was.
If I understood you correctly, you also claimed that Trump won his campaign by empowering racist rednecks. It seems to me that you need to do much more than empower racist rednecks to win the general election. So that also seemed hyperbolic to me.
If anything, it's that kind of general rhetoric that I find exaggerated. I try to be as objective as possible, so even though I don't like Trump, I will defend him or anyone else whom I find is being unfairly or disingenuously criticized. If I'm wrong, then I'd be more than happy to change my opinion in light of solid evidence.blackamerica wrote: »Stop making blanket statements if you can't explain what you're talking about fam
With all due respect, you don't have to worry about me making blanket statements. No matter how unpopular, I say what I mean and mean what I say and can back up what I say.
You shouldn't jump the gun and automatically assume that people can't explain what they'e talking about just because they haven't given you the kind of analysis you want. You know, you can simply just ask people for clarification if that's what you want.
Edit: Oh, yeah, I forgot. You also made a point about Trump advocating black protesters to be executed. Huh? At least on surface level, that doesn't sound a little exaggerated to you? Or would you like to clarify that point? -
Swiffness! wrote: »universalside wrote: »universalside wrote: »Oh so you voted for Obama who did nothing directly for black people and you think that makes you somebody??
Once again simple ? , you need to go back and read many threads, you just made a bunch of very moronic and incorrect assumptions about me, you don't know me at all. You haven't even been reading my posts in this thread for comprehension smh
When you're ready to humble yourself and learn, THATS when true understanding will find you, simpleton
I voted for somebody and that makes me 100% better than somebody who doesn't vote, nor stand for anything outside of how to be critical to your own kind while simultaneously figuring out how to cosign Donald Trump.
I give you decades of Trump racism and your reaction is to criticize Obama. You don't even make the cut for simple.
Nah that makes you an ignorant slave
And once again simple ? , I vote, just not for the president because the popular vote DOES NOT MATTER
YOU LITERALLY JUST SAW THE IRRELEVANCY OF THE POPULAR VOTE ONE MONTH AGO simple ?
I know you, everybody on this thread knows you. You're a do-nothing, fake afrocentric fool that would likely spend more time dissing Obama and any black person you could find rather than confront a racist on their racism. If Kanye had said 'I went to Trump tower to get an apology' instead of getting his fried chicken photo-op we'd be debating something different.
Your arguments are cyclical and the rantings of a complete goofball. Just corny in almost every way.
Lol.....we done triggered this loyal InfoWars Stan into flooding another thread with 50 replies of pump fakes and circular logic.
Someone @ me when they finally ban this "simpleton"
Who's the infowars stan??
I don't ? with infowars at all, they're the feds
You're not smart so I wouldn't expect you to know this -
Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »On a more positive note, just read somewhere that Trump is in favor of expanding stop and frisk to " urban" areas.....
They gonna ignore this tho.
Just like they gonna ignore that he still advocates the death penalty for those 5 Black and Latino boys (now men who spent years in jail) who were vindicated, by DNA, of the Central Park ? .
And they're going to ignore his tight ties to racist MFs like Giuliani etc...
But mention Killary / Email / PizzaGate / Super-Predator, and these MFs could go on for days.
Ignore what?? The ? that's already happening now??
I've been asking you ? how ? can get any worse outside of chattel slavery and you ? STILL CANNOT GIVE ME A STRAIGHT ANSWER smh
If you ask that question, then you might as well be the one saying "It can't get any worse for Black people".
And by the way, that question was answered numerous times - one example was nationwide stop and frisk. And I don't remember you having a "straight-answer" response to that. Something along the lines of "how is that not happening already ?" which was explained by another poster who clarified what it meant to have this implemented nationwide and have a command in chief who strongly supports the police.
Besides stop and frisk, the police are asking for whatever military surplus weapons they were barred from getting recently under the Obama administration (who likely gave them some in the first place, but also barred them from some).
What do you think Mr. "Law and Order" president, who was endorsed by the fraternal order of pigs, will do - probably give them the damn weapons... to ? more Black people.
Like they're already killing black people?? -
stringer bell wrote: »
Ain't shooting them cops who shooting kids
? ass ? , it's ? ? to have babies running around with glocks full of extra bullets
Worry about home instead of what celebs doing
That's not what ? means - no matter how you want to cut it.
What does it mean?
General definition:
cooning: deliberately degrading yourself or your Black race solely for the entertainment / acceptance of white people. -
Did Bernie Sanders
"Lock up black PEOPLE" too
Is Charles Roberts also guilty of
"Sending us all to wars"
To how many people does this "pick a random political figure and categorically blame them for historical events, in a vaccum" Logic apply to?
Clearly you're asking yourself this because you literally just picked random political figures and blamed them for historical events
I posted historical fact
Bernie Sanders was more instrumental in passing the 1994 Crime Bill than Hilary Clinton.
So I ask you again, by the logic you use to deduce your "facts" ...
Did Bernie Sanders
"Lock up black PEOPLE" too -
Did Bernie Sanders
"Lock up black PEOPLE" too
Is Charles Roberts also guilty of
"Sending us all to wars"
To how many people does this "pick a random political figure and categorically blame them for historical events, in a vaccum" Logic apply to?
Clearly you're asking yourself this because you literally just picked random political figures and blamed them for historical events
I posted historical fact
Bernie Sanders was more instrumental in passing the 1994 Crime Bill than Hilary Clinton.
So I ask you again, by the logic you use to deduce your "facts" ...
Did Bernie Sanders
"Lock up black PEOPLE" too
Yes
Ok what now -
Focal Point wrote: »stringer bell wrote: »
Smh... That's ignorant and silly
Exactly
They'll threaten Kanye with gun violence yet Zimmerman is still going any and everywhere he pleases while blatantly disrespecting the child that he murdered
Diddy Chicagoians shut down a Trump rally?
And Zimmerman don't live in Chicago..Stop trying g to justify your ?
Word, because nobody threatens Zimmerman - especially when he be goin' on tour and doing all those concerts and public appearances and ? .
Oh you mean the threats that haven't been affecting his movements at all?
Oh ok
The point is that statement implies that "they":
1. Have never threatened zimmerman.
2. Have had the opportunity to ? zimmerman and haven't taken it.
Can you prove that ? -
Meeting Trump isn't cooning, but thrown all the other ? ? he does then well its easy why some say that.
Kanye has an obsession with European Fashion, Art and Culture, screaming racisim but also wanting to get white peoples acceptance and accolades.
Married a white ? , now meeting Trump smh. -
Focal Point wrote: »stringer bell wrote: »
Smh... That's ignorant and silly
Exactly
They'll threaten Kanye with gun violence yet Zimmerman is still going any and everywhere he pleases while blatantly disrespecting the child that he murdered
Diddy Chicagoians shut down a Trump rally?
And Zimmerman don't live in Chicago..Stop trying g to justify your ?
Word, because nobody threatens Zimmerman - especially when he be goin' on tour and doing all those concerts and public appearances and ? .
Oh you mean the threats that haven't been affecting his movements at all?
Oh ok
The point is that statement implies that "they":
1. Have never threatened zimmerman.
2. Have had the opportunity to ? zimmerman and haven't taken it.
Can you prove that ?
Yes
Whatever threats you think may or may not have happened have not hindered his movements or racist disrespectful rhetoric in an way
He consistently acts an ass on social media so clearly he doesn't feel truly threatened -
delete
-
Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »On a more positive note, just read somewhere that Trump is in favor of expanding stop and frisk to " urban" areas.....
They gonna ignore this tho.
Just like they gonna ignore that he still advocates the death penalty for those 5 Black and Latino boys (now men who spent years in jail) who were vindicated, by DNA, of the Central Park ? .
And they're going to ignore his tight ties to racist MFs like Giuliani etc...
But mention Killary / Email / PizzaGate / Super-Predator, and these MFs could go on for days.
Ignore what?? The ? that's already happening now??
I've been asking you ? how ? can get any worse outside of chattel slavery and you ? STILL CANNOT GIVE ME A STRAIGHT ANSWER smh
If you ask that question, then you might as well be the one saying "It can't get any worse for Black people".
And by the way, that question was answered numerous times - one example was nationwide stop and frisk. And I don't remember you having a "straight-answer" response to that. Something along the lines of "how is that not happening already ?" which was explained by another poster who clarified what it meant to have this implemented nationwide and have a command in chief who strongly supports the police.
Besides stop and frisk, the police are asking for whatever military surplus weapons they were barred from getting recently under the Obama administration (who likely gave them some in the first place, but also barred them from some).
What do you think Mr. "Law and Order" president, who was endorsed by the fraternal order of pigs, will do - probably give them the damn weapons... to ? more Black people.
Like they're already killing black people??
They're asking for more powerful weapons
and they would have more POWER to ? Black people,
and more backing and authority to do so.
The keyword is "more".
Try to grasp the concept of things becoming worse.
Right now, you're asking how cops having military weapons and complete authority to ? Black people is not worse than now - then you say people didn't answer the question.
And you talk about being disingenuous ?
disingenuous: not candid or sincere, typically by pretending that one knows less about something than one really does. -
-
stringer bell wrote: »
You ? can't be this damn dumb -
blackamerica wrote: »blackamerica wrote: »Kanye may or may not be a ? but him meeting with Trump isn't cooning
I don't understand how some of y'all think smh.
This butthurtness is really not going to help black people elevate ourselves
He's the next president, do you understand this?
Jew's put ? in power and there were many Jewish ? 's so this is an absolutely horrible comparison to make
Soros was a Jewish national socialist
It'll be more accurate to called them "Jewish ? " who sold their own people because they believed "if you can't beat them join them"..... -
Hey I know why don't we just let black people actually be free and vote for whoever the ? they want without being labeled a ?
-
Hes a clown so is jim brown/ray lewis for meeting with the Lloyd Banks daddy.. and Trump to discuss "'black issues"
-
blackamerica wrote: »blackamerica wrote: »Kanye may or may not be a ? but him meeting with Trump isn't cooning
I don't understand how some of y'all think smh.
This butthurtness is really not going to help black people elevate ourselves
He's the next president, do you understand this?
Jew's put ? in power and there were many Jewish ? 's so this is an absolutely horrible comparison to make
Soros was a Jewish national socialist
It'll be more accurate to called them "Jewish ? " who sold their own people because they believed "if you can't beat them join them".....
Incorrect
It was the rich Jewish elite that set up the entire conflict at the time -
blackamerica wrote: »blackamerica wrote: »Kanye may or may not be a ? but him meeting with Trump isn't cooning
I don't understand how some of y'all think smh.
This butthurtness is really not going to help black people elevate ourselves
He's the next president, do you understand this?
Jew's put ? in power and there were many Jewish ? 's so this is an absolutely horrible comparison to make
Soros was a Jewish national socialist
It'll be more accurate to called them "Jewish ? " who sold their own people because they believed "if you can't beat them join them".....
We not allowed to mention jews anymore
Ask lupe -
Did Bernie Sanders
"Lock up black PEOPLE" too
Is Charles Roberts also guilty of
"Sending us all to wars"
To how many people does this "pick a random political figure and categorically blame them for historical events, in a vaccum" Logic apply to?
Clearly you're asking yourself this because you literally just picked random political figures and blamed them for historical events
I posted historical fact
Bernie Sanders was more instrumental in passing the 1994 Crime Bill than Hilary Clinton.
So I ask you again, by the logic you use to deduce your "facts" ...
Did Bernie Sanders
"Lock up black PEOPLE" too
Yes
Ok what now
Where were your overflowing pages of titangraphs and conspiracy theories demonizing Bernie Sanders? ...
Or John Porter,
Or Jane Meyers,
Or Fred Upton,
Or Jim Sexton ...
Or the members of the Black Caucus who ACTUALLY VOTED for the Crime Bill?
... unlike Hilary Clinton.
Ever consider that part of the reason you are so incensed with Hatred towards that pasty old white lady ...
is because the powers that be actually want you to be. -
Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »On a more positive note, just read somewhere that Trump is in favor of expanding stop and frisk to " urban" areas.....
They gonna ignore this tho.
Just like they gonna ignore that he still advocates the death penalty for those 5 Black and Latino boys (now men who spent years in jail) who were vindicated, by DNA, of the Central Park ? .
And they're going to ignore his tight ties to racist MFs like Giuliani etc...
But mention Killary / Email / PizzaGate / Super-Predator, and these MFs could go on for days.
Ignore what?? The ? that's already happening now??
I've been asking you ? how ? can get any worse outside of chattel slavery and you ? STILL CANNOT GIVE ME A STRAIGHT ANSWER smh
If you ask that question, then you might as well be the one saying "It can't get any worse for Black people".
And by the way, that question was answered numerous times - one example was nationwide stop and frisk. And I don't remember you having a "straight-answer" response to that. Something along the lines of "how is that not happening already ?" which was explained by another poster who clarified what it meant to have this implemented nationwide and have a command in chief who strongly supports the police.
Besides stop and frisk, the police are asking for whatever military surplus weapons they were barred from getting recently under the Obama administration (who likely gave them some in the first place, but also barred them from some).
What do you think Mr. "Law and Order" president, who was endorsed by the fraternal order of pigs, will do - probably give them the damn weapons... to ? more Black people.
Like they're already killing black people??
They're asking for more powerful weapons
and they would have more POWER to ? Black people,
and more backing and authority to do so.
The keyword is "more".
Try to grasp the concept of things becoming worse.
Right now, you're asking how could cops having military weapons and complete authority to ? iBlack people is not worse than now - then you say people didn't answer to question.
And you talk about being disingenuous ?
disingenuous: not candid or sincere, typically by pretending that one knows less about something than one really does.
Cops already have military weaponry
We saw this in ferguson and baltimore -
blackamerica wrote: »blackamerica wrote: »blackamerica wrote: »blackamerica wrote: »Lol. So hanging out with a open white supremacist who won a campaign off empowering racist rednecks is a "power move"?
I don't agree with what he said, but what you're saying sounds so exaggerated.
It's so crazy how this 2016 election has everyone willfully taking either extreme. Got people crying, spitting empty rhetoric, blatantly lying, and blindly jumping on manufactured narratives. Where did all the rational, objective people go?
Now which part of anything I just posted is "exaggerated"?
Stop making blanket statements if you can't explain what you're talking about fam
Your statements were and are exaggerated. Not just you but most of the people taking your stance in this thread are also exaggerating
Trump has never endorsed those groups, actually he has come out against pretty much all of those groups but you don't care because that fact doesn't fit your narrative.
Please show me where trump has ever spoken favorably of ANY racist alt-right groups
Y'all are literally no different than the white people that lump all black people together with the BLM organization and then blame all black people when one black person does something dumb
It's crazy how ignorant some of y'all get on this topic smh. I don't give af about trump but it's crazy how you ? are trying to scare black people into a passive state where we can't even attempt to get favorable things accomplished for black people
I can't believe ? is in here DEFENDING whether Trump's a racist. Are really that dumb???
What are you even talking about?? Who in here said trump wasn't racist?
Why can't you read my words for comprehension instead of projecting your own thoughts onto my statements?
I ask again, what is the solution for how black people are supposed to move under a trump presidency? Are we supposed to hide from him? Why can't any of y'all answer this?
MOST upper level politicians are racist, INCLUDING HILLARY.
What is your solution?? You seem to think you have the answers. Please enlighten me
You agree Trump's a racist. No african american should ever under NO TERMS "befriend" a open racist. Donald Trump has shown he doesn't have black ppl best interest.
ANYBODY who is black and does business or hangs with a racist is a certified ? . Only ppl with no morals support this coonery
What's complicated about that???
More generalities smh. What subjects am I jumping around on and who have I not directly addressed??
How is doing business with a person befriending them??
White racists do business with and take black money LITERALLY ALL THE TIME
IT'S LITERALLY ONE OF THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE US ECONOMY so again what are you even talking about?
So again, you agree Trump's racist. You really don't see how a black man "befriending" a KNOWN racist is coonin? You're either really this dumb or just trollin -
Your energy is absolutely toxic
you have no idea how disrespectful you're being right now
Then again you're the guy that got banned for selling 2nd 3rd hand female nudes to other guys who also couldn't get them themselves