Romo>>>>>>>>Vick
Options
Comments
-
The only difference is the cowboys played the lions and bucs while the eagles played the bears and falcons
Both teams played one playoff team and one non playoff team -
Angrius Manus wrote: »Since they are in the same division, I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that they damn near had the same schedule
I'm reaching cause on numbers alone you are right that Philly had the better defense last season
but from a purely analytical standpoint as a football fan..........I would rather have a better defensive interior than a better secondary -
Philly had a better defense in 2010 also while Dallas was in the bottom half of the league
-
And I would rather have a better secondary...no use of having a good front when your secondary is giving up chunks of yardage.....especially since its now a passing league
-
Philly had more sacks last year and it was a wash on interceptions and fumble recoveries
-
There's no point of aguring with someone When you already stated factssssssssss!!!
-
why are we talking about who has the better defensive unit?
-
He Larry Us
-
dbrazil412 wrote: »why are we talking about who has the better defensive unit?
Someone said if Vick had Dallas defense he would be in the playoffs every year. At best both defenses have sucked in recent years but all of a sudden Vick makes a defense better. -
major pain wrote: »dbrazil412 wrote: »why are we talking about who has the better defensive unit?
Someone said if Vick had Dallas defense he would be in the playoffs every year. At best both defenses have sucked in recent years but all of a sudden Vick makes a defense better.
oh.. lol.. well i dont havta explain our defensive struggles to you.. but whatever haha -
Angrius Manus wrote: »And I would rather have a better secondary...no use of having a good front when your secondary is giving up chunks of yardage.....especially since its now a passing league
that's now tho bruh.........plus that's that trendy ? coaches be on to criticize running quarterbacks
what about defending the run?
what about putting pressure on the QB? -
dbrazil412 wrote: »major pain wrote: »
Someone said if Vick had Dallas defense he would be in the playoffs every year. At best both defenses have sucked in recent years but all of a sudden Vick makes a defense better.dbrazil412 wrote: »why are we talking about who has the better defensive unit?
oh.. lol.. well i dont havta explain our defensive struggles to you.. but whatever hahadbrazil412 wrote: »major pain wrote: »dbrazil412 wrote: »why are we talking about who has the better defensive unit?
Someone said if Vick had Dallas defense he would be in the playoffs every year. At best both defenses have sucked in recent years but all of a sudden Vick makes a defense better.
oh.. lol.. well i dont havta explain our defensive struggles to you.. but whatever haha
That's why I hit that ? with the djax face -
I wish both of'em would hurry up and get old or retire so this silly ass argument can die..
*looks at the 2.4 million Jordan vs. Kobe threads...
...nevermind. -
blakfyahking wrote: »Angrius Manus wrote: »And I would rather have a better secondary...no use of having a good front when your secondary is giving up chunks of yardage.....especially since its now a passing league
that's now tho bruh.........plus that's that trendy ? coaches be on to criticize running quarterbacks
what about defending the run?
what about putting pressure on the QB?
Philly has had more sacks than Dallas the past couple of seasons....and although Dallas has a better run D, its not that much better to make that much of a difference, especially with the eagles d outperforming the cowboys d overall
So I still fail to see how does Dallas have a better defense these past few years...
-
because this thread is about to die...get your last posts in loldbrazil412 wrote: »why are we talking about who has the better defensive unit?
-
InB4thelock like...
-
you know what? this damn near hit 1000 posts...i will wait and close it then
-
Peagle mad
-
bankrupt baller wrote: »Peagle mad
how? i acknowledged this ? the last page. yall not sayin nothin that anyone that actually watches football can see. -
Hilarious how this went from a debate of who's better, to everyone agreeing Vick's not very good, to Romo>>>Vick being so obvious that it's not even threadworthy.
-
Vick brings more to the table as far as skill set than Romo, and came in the league with a horrible team that didnt develop him as a passer. Romo came into a better situation with an owner who will spend.. It apples and oranges to me
-
Vick brings more to the table as far as skill set than Romo, and came in the league with a horrible team that didnt develop him as a passer. Romo came into a better situation with an owner who will spend.. It apples and oranges to me
Lord no don't start this again, I think this was already argued on like page 27 or something. -
LMAO at vick having a better skill set than Romo.
GTFATWOH -
Thats...
Get the ? all the way outta here -
Yo the arguments for Vick being better are getting epic.....don't lock this thread....I want to see what people start coming up with a few weeks from now
This discussion has been closed.