'Bill Cosby Show’ Actress Claims Comedian ? Her In New Lawsuit
Options
Comments
-
-
5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this.
That's how the legal system works ace
Somebody why is your ? ? being prosecuted then?
You mean why is he being prosecuted a half-century after the alleged crimes happened right?
Why wasn't he prosecuted when the crimes happened? Why did this new chick file a civil suit and settle if it wasn't just a money grab?
Why are you calling Cosby my ? ? ? Is it because I know how to reason and think logically? You still haven't provided any evidence of rapes 1-10 or any of them like I requested before
Half century? This charge is from something 10 years ago. This is how I know you know few details about what you're actually defending because you keep using the same points despite being told repeatedly they're incorrect facts you're going off of.
You actually didn't even fully read my post but I won't fault you for that, you don't seem to know what you're talking about anyway, and you're posting emotionally instead of objectively
Now please misread this post and make another ignorant comment
I did read your post. Your going off misinformation and every time you're presented with a different opinion from yours you give the same response. Instead of actually considering your facts you're using are wrong you just claim others are being emotional.
Nope I actually mentioned the new chick ony 2nd paragraph of that post
Anything else you got from my post is in your own head
Please tell me what facts I've posted besides the fact that you ? have no evidence to indict Cosby with?
Why can't you gullible ? stay focused? Y'all are bending over backwards trying to change the subject
Your post said he's being prosecuted for half century old crimes and he's not. This is for one from 2004. Your own words. ..and your question about how come charges weren't brought up before you've also been told multiple times a prosecutor has come out and said they wanted to bring charges in the past but didn't because of lack of evidence. Your questions are being answered but you don't like the answers so you're fishing for more instead of considering the reality that the answers really may just be some ? you don't like or want to accept.
And I also mentioned the new chick that filed a CIVIL SUIT AFTER BEING ? THEN TOOK A SETTLEMENT
Do you know what a civil suit it?
How old are you btw? This is like the 5th+ time I've had to simplify already simple things for you
I already know there's a lack of evidence, you seem to be the one on denial
Trust me, I'm not fishing for anything, how about you fish for some proof that Cosby ? somebody instead of trying to change the subject AGAIN
And when you can't find any, ask yourself what you're really doing in this threadIn the deposition, Cosby said he fondled Constand that night, taking her silence as a green light. Constand maintains she was semi-conscious after he gave her pills he said would relax her.
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/investigations/Bill-Cosby-Montgomery-County-Charges-363817451.html
From the same deposition he admits to giving women qualudes....how much more proof do you need he was out here messing with women while they were too far under the influence to consent to anything?
Wait so you have no evidence that he taped anyone so now you're trying to shift the discussion but I'm gonna keep you right on subject
Like I JUST SAOD LIKE 30 MINUTES AGO, EVERYONE IN THAT DEPOSITION TESTIFIED TO KNOWINGLY TAKING DRUGS
Yes, including the females
Have you take quaaludes or any drugs at all? Do you know what they do? From your posts I'm pretty sure you don't know a single thing about those kinds of drugs, yet you keep posting like yours some kind of authority.
The people trying to destroy Cosby love the fact that you're as ignorant as you are btw, idk why you think a quaalude and a roofie are the same thing but they're not
Please try again
I know plenty about drugs. You seem to miss the basic point that sleeping with someone unconscious or so far gone is illegal regardless and that is what qualifies it as ? ...and not all of them said they willingly took the drugs. Some have said Cosby gave them a drink and they felt weird afterwards but had no clue what he put in it. You ask for evidence..are shown Cosby admitting to giving women drugs to have sex with them..and still ask "where's the proof" when he is openly admitting to doing exactly what many of the victims claim.
And you keep repeating yourself.
Why?
Once again, every female that testified in that deposition stated that they knowingly took the drugs. What females are you talking about? -
Cosby had these women doing the Jordan Belfort sheesh.5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this.
That's how the legal system works ace
Somebody why is your ? ? being prosecuted then?
You mean why is he being prosecuted a half-century after the alleged crimes happened right?
Why wasn't he prosecuted when the crimes happened? Why did this new chick file a civil suit and settle if it wasn't just a money grab?
Why are you calling Cosby my ? ? ? Is it because I know how to reason and think logically? You still haven't provided any evidence of rapes 1-10 or any of them like I requested before
Half century? This charge is from something 10 years ago. This is how I know you know few details about what you're actually defending because you keep using the same points despite being told repeatedly they're incorrect facts you're going off of.
You actually didn't even fully read my post but I won't fault you for that, you don't seem to know what you're talking about anyway, and you're posting emotionally instead of objectively
Now please misread this post and make another ignorant comment
I did read your post. Your going off misinformation and every time you're presented with a different opinion from yours you give the same response. Instead of actually considering your facts you're using are wrong you just claim others are being emotional.
Nope I actually mentioned the new chick ony 2nd paragraph of that post
Anything else you got from my post is in your own head
Please tell me what facts I've posted besides the fact that you ? have no evidence to indict Cosby with?
Why can't you gullible ? stay focused? Y'all are bending over backwards trying to change the subject
Your post said he's being prosecuted for half century old crimes and he's not. This is for one from 2004. Your own words. ..and your question about how come charges weren't brought up before you've also been told multiple times a prosecutor has come out and said they wanted to bring charges in the past but didn't because of lack of evidence. Your questions are being answered but you don't like the answers so you're fishing for more instead of considering the reality that the answers really may just be some ? you don't like or want to accept.
And I also mentioned the new chick that filed a CIVIL SUIT AFTER BEING ? THEN TOOK A SETTLEMENT
Do you know what a civil suit it?
How old are you btw? This is like the 5th+ time I've had to simplify already simple things for you
I already know there's a lack of evidence, you seem to be the one on denial
Trust me, I'm not fishing for anything, how about you fish for some proof that Cosby ? somebody instead of trying to change the subject AGAIN
And when you can't find any, ask yourself what you're really doing in this threadIn the deposition, Cosby said he fondled Constand that night, taking her silence as a green light. Constand maintains she was semi-conscious after he gave her pills he said would relax her.
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/investigations/Bill-Cosby-Montgomery-County-Charges-363817451.html
From the same deposition he admits to giving women qualudes....how much more proof do you need he was out here messing with women while they were too far under the influence to consent to anything?
Wait so you have no evidence that he taped anyone so now you're trying to shift the discussion but I'm gonna keep you right on subject
Like I JUST SAOD LIKE 30 MINUTES AGO, EVERYONE IN THAT DEPOSITION TESTIFIED TO KNOWINGLY TAKING DRUGS
Yes, including the females
Have you take quaaludes or any drugs at all? Do you know what they do? From your posts I'm pretty sure you don't know a single thing about those kinds of drugs, yet you keep posting like yours some kind of authority.
The people trying to destroy Cosby love the fact that you're as ignorant as you are btw, idk why you think a quaalude and a roofie are the same thing but they're not
Please try again
What do you think quaaludes do?
Wait he's supposed to be passed out, that can't be right -
Black_Thunder wrote: »The best part about this is this stupid ass old ? used to make jokes about drugging and ? chicks in his stand up act, all they gotta is play that tape and its a wrap.
""Pay attention,and you will see my clip....Show the clip boys"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2upS28i8qs -
@xxCivicxx honey, if your idol wasn't guilty of anything, and was so morally righteous, why did he pay these women?
Because people like you don't care about facts and will continue to slander a grown man who has accomplished much greater things than you based off of the gossip of old birds
So he, just like most rich people in the spotlight getting shaken down have done, chose to stamp out a small fire early before more people like yourself heard the made up claims and tried to crucify him over gossip
People like myself who discuss this over a message board? That's crucifying him?harry knucklez wrote: »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i3IKHUzf6Y
@ 6:21 mark.
Not all of these women weren't even drugged. This chick claims that on the set of a movie, Bill just stuck his ? in her mouth and nutted all over her clothes. She conveniently left out the fact that she sucked his ? , but regardless, if it went down like that, why didn't she go to the police afterwards? Them ? stains on her clothes would've been evidence, that ? don't just wipe off. Ask Monica Lewinsky.
Not all women who are ? go to the police. A whole lot do not.
Have you ever called Cosby a ? in real life?
Don't lie even though I know you will -
Black_Thunder wrote: »The best part about this is this stupid ass old ? used to make jokes about drugging and ? chicks in his stand up act, all they gotta is play that tape and its a wrap.
""Pay attention,and you will see my clip....Show the clip boys"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2upS28i8qs
Can you post that whole Larry king interview? -
@xxCivicxx honey, if your idol wasn't guilty of anything, and was so morally righteous, why did he pay these women?
Because people like you don't care about facts and will continue to slander a grown man who has accomplished much greater things than you based off of the gossip of old birds
So he, just like most rich people in the spotlight getting shaken down have done, chose to stamp out a small fire early before more people like yourself heard the made up claims and tried to crucify him over gossip
People like myself who discuss this over a message board? That's crucifying him?harry knucklez wrote: »https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i3IKHUzf6Y
@ 6:21 mark.
Not all of these women weren't even drugged. This chick claims that on the set of a movie, Bill just stuck his ? in her mouth and nutted all over her clothes. She conveniently left out the fact that she sucked his ? , but regardless, if it went down like that, why didn't she go to the police afterwards? Them ? stains on her clothes would've been evidence, that ? don't just wipe off. Ask Monica Lewinsky.
Not all women who are ? go to the police. A whole lot do not.
Have you ever called Cosby a ? in real life?
Don't lie even though I know you will
Who are you that I need to lie to? Some faceless ? online? Foh
Yes -
Black_Thunder wrote: »The best part about this is this stupid ass old ? used to make jokes about drugging and ? chicks in his stand up act, all they gotta is play that tape and its a wrap.
""Pay attention,and you will see my clip....Show the clip boys"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2upS28i8qs
Her body language in that video shows how uncomfortable she is, and he didn't back up an inch. -
@xxCivicxx honey, if your idol wasn't guilty of anything, and was so morally righteous, why did he pay these women?
Because people like you don't care about facts and will continue to slander a grown man who has accomplished much greater things than you based off of the gossip of old birds
So he, just like most rich people in the spotlight getting shaken down have done, chose to stamp out a small fire early before more people like yourself heard the made up claims and tried to crucify him over gossip
People like myself who discuss this over a message board? That's crucifying him?harry knucklez wrote: »https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i3IKHUzf6Y
@ 6:21 mark.
Not all of these women weren't even drugged. This chick claims that on the set of a movie, Bill just stuck his ? in her mouth and nutted all over her clothes. She conveniently left out the fact that she sucked his ? , but regardless, if it went down like that, why didn't she go to the police afterwards? Them ? stains on her clothes would've been evidence, that ? don't just wipe off. Ask Monica Lewinsky.
Not all women who are ? go to the police. A whole lot do not.
I understand that but I firmly believe that some of the hoes in this case are lying. -
5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this.
That's how the legal system works ace
Somebody why is your ? ? being prosecuted then?
You mean why is he being prosecuted a half-century after the alleged crimes happened right?
Why wasn't he prosecuted when the crimes happened? Why did this new chick file a civil suit and settle if it wasn't just a money grab?
Why are you calling Cosby my ? ? ? Is it because I know how to reason and think logically? You still haven't provided any evidence of rapes 1-10 or any of them like I requested before
Half century? This charge is from something 10 years ago. This is how I know you know few details about what you're actually defending because you keep using the same points despite being told repeatedly they're incorrect facts you're going off of.
You actually didn't even fully read my post but I won't fault you for that, you don't seem to know what you're talking about anyway, and you're posting emotionally instead of objectively
Now please misread this post and make another ignorant comment
I did read your post. Your going off misinformation and every time you're presented with a different opinion from yours you give the same response. Instead of actually considering your facts you're using are wrong you just claim others are being emotional.
Nope I actually mentioned the new chick ony 2nd paragraph of that post
Anything else you got from my post is in your own head
Please tell me what facts I've posted besides the fact that you ? have no evidence to indict Cosby with?
Why can't you gullible ? stay focused? Y'all are bending over backwards trying to change the subject
Your post said he's being prosecuted for half century old crimes and he's not. This is for one from 2004. Your own words. ..and your question about how come charges weren't brought up before you've also been told multiple times a prosecutor has come out and said they wanted to bring charges in the past but didn't because of lack of evidence. Your questions are being answered but you don't like the answers so you're fishing for more instead of considering the reality that the answers really may just be some ? you don't like or want to accept.
And I also mentioned the new chick that filed a CIVIL SUIT AFTER BEING ? THEN TOOK A SETTLEMENT
Do you know what a civil suit it?
How old are you btw? This is like the 5th+ time I've had to simplify already simple things for you
I already know there's a lack of evidence, you seem to be the one on denial
Trust me, I'm not fishing for anything, how about you fish for some proof that Cosby ? somebody instead of trying to change the subject AGAIN
And when you can't find any, ask yourself what you're really doing in this threadIn the deposition, Cosby said he fondled Constand that night, taking her silence as a green light. Constand maintains she was semi-conscious after he gave her pills he said would relax her.
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/investigations/Bill-Cosby-Montgomery-County-Charges-363817451.html
From the same deposition he admits to giving women qualudes....how much more proof do you need he was out here messing with women while they were too far under the influence to consent to anything?
Wait so you have no evidence that he taped anyone so now you're trying to shift the discussion but I'm gonna keep you right on subject
Like I JUST SAOD LIKE 30 MINUTES AGO, EVERYONE IN THAT DEPOSITION TESTIFIED TO KNOWINGLY TAKING DRUGS
Yes, including the females
Have you take quaaludes or any drugs at all? Do you know what they do? From your posts I'm pretty sure you don't know a single thing about those kinds of drugs, yet you keep posting like yours some kind of authority.
The people trying to destroy Cosby love the fact that you're as ignorant as you are btw, idk why you think a quaalude and a roofie are the same thing but they're not
Please try again
I know plenty about drugs. You seem to miss the basic point that sleeping with someone unconscious or so far gone is illegal regardless and that is what qualifies it as ? ...and not all of them said they willingly took the drugs. Some have said Cosby gave them a drink and they felt weird afterwards but had no clue what he put in it. You ask for evidence..are shown Cosby admitting to giving women drugs to have sex with them..and still ask "where's the proof" when he is openly admitting to doing exactly what many of the victims claim.
And you keep repeating yourself.
Why?
Once again, every female that testified in that deposition stated that they knowingly took the drugs. What females are you talking about?
Read actress Beverly Johnson's accusation against him. -
5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this.
That's how the legal system works ace
Somebody why is your ? ? being prosecuted then?
You mean why is he being prosecuted a half-century after the alleged crimes happened right?
Why wasn't he prosecuted when the crimes happened? Why did this new chick file a civil suit and settle if it wasn't just a money grab?
Why are you calling Cosby my ? ? ? Is it because I know how to reason and think logically? You still haven't provided any evidence of rapes 1-10 or any of them like I requested before
Half century? This charge is from something 10 years ago. This is how I know you know few details about what you're actually defending because you keep using the same points despite being told repeatedly they're incorrect facts you're going off of.
You actually didn't even fully read my post but I won't fault you for that, you don't seem to know what you're talking about anyway, and you're posting emotionally instead of objectively
Now please misread this post and make another ignorant comment
I did read your post. Your going off misinformation and every time you're presented with a different opinion from yours you give the same response. Instead of actually considering your facts you're using are wrong you just claim others are being emotional.
Nope I actually mentioned the new chick ony 2nd paragraph of that post
Anything else you got from my post is in your own head
Please tell me what facts I've posted besides the fact that you ? have no evidence to indict Cosby with?
Why can't you gullible ? stay focused? Y'all are bending over backwards trying to change the subject
Your post said he's being prosecuted for half century old crimes and he's not. This is for one from 2004. Your own words. ..and your question about how come charges weren't brought up before you've also been told multiple times a prosecutor has come out and said they wanted to bring charges in the past but didn't because of lack of evidence. Your questions are being answered but you don't like the answers so you're fishing for more instead of considering the reality that the answers really may just be some ? you don't like or want to accept.
And I also mentioned the new chick that filed a CIVIL SUIT AFTER BEING ? THEN TOOK A SETTLEMENT
Do you know what a civil suit it?
How old are you btw? This is like the 5th+ time I've had to simplify already simple things for you
I already know there's a lack of evidence, you seem to be the one on denial
Trust me, I'm not fishing for anything, how about you fish for some proof that Cosby ? somebody instead of trying to change the subject AGAIN
And when you can't find any, ask yourself what you're really doing in this threadIn the deposition, Cosby said he fondled Constand that night, taking her silence as a green light. Constand maintains she was semi-conscious after he gave her pills he said would relax her.
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/investigations/Bill-Cosby-Montgomery-County-Charges-363817451.html
From the same deposition he admits to giving women qualudes....how much more proof do you need he was out here messing with women while they were too far under the influence to consent to anything?
Wait so you have no evidence that he taped anyone so now you're trying to shift the discussion but I'm gonna keep you right on subject
Like I JUST SAOD LIKE 30 MINUTES AGO, EVERYONE IN THAT DEPOSITION TESTIFIED TO KNOWINGLY TAKING DRUGS
Yes, including the females
Have you take quaaludes or any drugs at all? Do you know what they do? From your posts I'm pretty sure you don't know a single thing about those kinds of drugs, yet you keep posting like yours some kind of authority.
The people trying to destroy Cosby love the fact that you're as ignorant as you are btw, idk why you think a quaalude and a roofie are the same thing but they're not
Please try again
What do you think quaaludes do?
I know what they do, they sedate you and they enhance sex
I'm sure all those people in the club's popping them and ? each other back in the 70s REALLY just wanted to go to sleep in the club
They were all ?
So the sedation isn't a red flag. Ok... -
Welp....what was Cosby doing with the cake in his hand?
-
harry knucklez wrote: »@xxCivicxx honey, if your idol wasn't guilty of anything, and was so morally righteous, why did he pay these women?
Because people like you don't care about facts and will continue to slander a grown man who has accomplished much greater things than you based off of the gossip of old birds
So he, just like most rich people in the spotlight getting shaken down have done, chose to stamp out a small fire early before more people like yourself heard the made up claims and tried to crucify him over gossip
People like myself who discuss this over a message board? That's crucifying him?harry knucklez wrote: »https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i3IKHUzf6Y
@ 6:21 mark.
Not all of these women weren't even drugged. This chick claims that on the set of a movie, Bill just stuck his ? in her mouth and nutted all over her clothes. She conveniently left out the fact that she sucked his ? , but regardless, if it went down like that, why didn't she go to the police afterwards? Them ? stains on her clothes would've been evidence, that ? don't just wipe off. Ask Monica Lewinsky.
Not all women who are ? go to the police. A whole lot do not.
I understand that but I firmly believe that some of the hoes in this case are lying.
I don't care if some are lying. I'm damn near positive every single woman who's ever accused him is not -
5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this.
That's how the legal system works ace
Somebody why is your ? ? being prosecuted then?
You mean why is he being prosecuted a half-century after the alleged crimes happened right?
Why wasn't he prosecuted when the crimes happened? Why did this new chick file a civil suit and settle if it wasn't just a money grab?
Why are you calling Cosby my ? ? ? Is it because I know how to reason and think logically? You still haven't provided any evidence of rapes 1-10 or any of them like I requested before
Half century? This charge is from something 10 years ago. This is how I know you know few details about what you're actually defending because you keep using the same points despite being told repeatedly they're incorrect facts you're going off of.
You actually didn't even fully read my post but I won't fault you for that, you don't seem to know what you're talking about anyway, and you're posting emotionally instead of objectively
Now please misread this post and make another ignorant comment
I did read your post. Your going off misinformation and every time you're presented with a different opinion from yours you give the same response. Instead of actually considering your facts you're using are wrong you just claim others are being emotional.
Nope I actually mentioned the new chick ony 2nd paragraph of that post
Anything else you got from my post is in your own head
Please tell me what facts I've posted besides the fact that you ? have no evidence to indict Cosby with?
Why can't you gullible ? stay focused? Y'all are bending over backwards trying to change the subject
Your post said he's being prosecuted for half century old crimes and he's not. This is for one from 2004. Your own words. ..and your question about how come charges weren't brought up before you've also been told multiple times a prosecutor has come out and said they wanted to bring charges in the past but didn't because of lack of evidence. Your questions are being answered but you don't like the answers so you're fishing for more instead of considering the reality that the answers really may just be some ? you don't like or want to accept.
And I also mentioned the new chick that filed a CIVIL SUIT AFTER BEING ? THEN TOOK A SETTLEMENT
Do you know what a civil suit it?
How old are you btw? This is like the 5th+ time I've had to simplify already simple things for you
I already know there's a lack of evidence, you seem to be the one on denial
Trust me, I'm not fishing for anything, how about you fish for some proof that Cosby ? somebody instead of trying to change the subject AGAIN
And when you can't find any, ask yourself what you're really doing in this threadIn the deposition, Cosby said he fondled Constand that night, taking her silence as a green light. Constand maintains she was semi-conscious after he gave her pills he said would relax her.
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/investigations/Bill-Cosby-Montgomery-County-Charges-363817451.html
From the same deposition he admits to giving women qualudes....how much more proof do you need he was out here messing with women while they were too far under the influence to consent to anything?
Wait so you have no evidence that he taped anyone so now you're trying to shift the discussion but I'm gonna keep you right on subject
Like I JUST SAOD LIKE 30 MINUTES AGO, EVERYONE IN THAT DEPOSITION TESTIFIED TO KNOWINGLY TAKING DRUGS
Yes, including the females
Have you take quaaludes or any drugs at all? Do you know what they do? From your posts I'm pretty sure you don't know a single thing about those kinds of drugs, yet you keep posting like yours some kind of authority.
The people trying to destroy Cosby love the fact that you're as ignorant as you are btw, idk why you think a quaalude and a roofie are the same thing but they're not
Please try again
I know plenty about drugs. You seem to miss the basic point that sleeping with someone unconscious or so far gone is illegal regardless and that is what qualifies it as ? ...and not all of them said they willingly took the drugs. Some have said Cosby gave them a drink and they felt weird afterwards but had no clue what he put in it. You ask for evidence..are shown Cosby admitting to giving women drugs to have sex with them..and still ask "where's the proof" when he is openly admitting to doing exactly what many of the victims claim.
And you keep repeating yourself.
Why?
Once again, every female that testified in that deposition stated that they knowingly took the drugs. What females are you talking about?
Read actress Beverly Johnson's accusation against him.
Her own former manager say that she lying about that ? . -
5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this.
That's how the legal system works ace
Somebody why is your ? ? being prosecuted then?
You mean why is he being prosecuted a half-century after the alleged crimes happened right?
Why wasn't he prosecuted when the crimes happened? Why did this new chick file a civil suit and settle if it wasn't just a money grab?
Why are you calling Cosby my ? ? ? Is it because I know how to reason and think logically? You still haven't provided any evidence of rapes 1-10 or any of them like I requested before
Half century? This charge is from something 10 years ago. This is how I know you know few details about what you're actually defending because you keep using the same points despite being told repeatedly they're incorrect facts you're going off of.
You actually didn't even fully read my post but I won't fault you for that, you don't seem to know what you're talking about anyway, and you're posting emotionally instead of objectively
Now please misread this post and make another ignorant comment
I did read your post. Your going off misinformation and every time you're presented with a different opinion from yours you give the same response. Instead of actually considering your facts you're using are wrong you just claim others are being emotional.
Nope I actually mentioned the new chick ony 2nd paragraph of that post
Anything else you got from my post is in your own head
Please tell me what facts I've posted besides the fact that you ? have no evidence to indict Cosby with?
Why can't you gullible ? stay focused? Y'all are bending over backwards trying to change the subject
Your post said he's being prosecuted for half century old crimes and he's not. This is for one from 2004. Your own words. ..and your question about how come charges weren't brought up before you've also been told multiple times a prosecutor has come out and said they wanted to bring charges in the past but didn't because of lack of evidence. Your questions are being answered but you don't like the answers so you're fishing for more instead of considering the reality that the answers really may just be some ? you don't like or want to accept.
And I also mentioned the new chick that filed a CIVIL SUIT AFTER BEING ? THEN TOOK A SETTLEMENT
Do you know what a civil suit it?
How old are you btw? This is like the 5th+ time I've had to simplify already simple things for you
I already know there's a lack of evidence, you seem to be the one on denial
Trust me, I'm not fishing for anything, how about you fish for some proof that Cosby ? somebody instead of trying to change the subject AGAIN
And when you can't find any, ask yourself what you're really doing in this threadIn the deposition, Cosby said he fondled Constand that night, taking her silence as a green light. Constand maintains she was semi-conscious after he gave her pills he said would relax her.
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/investigations/Bill-Cosby-Montgomery-County-Charges-363817451.html
From the same deposition he admits to giving women qualudes....how much more proof do you need he was out here messing with women while they were too far under the influence to consent to anything?
Wait so you have no evidence that he taped anyone so now you're trying to shift the discussion but I'm gonna keep you right on subject
Like I JUST SAOD LIKE 30 MINUTES AGO, EVERYONE IN THAT DEPOSITION TESTIFIED TO KNOWINGLY TAKING DRUGS
Yes, including the females
Have you take quaaludes or any drugs at all? Do you know what they do? From your posts I'm pretty sure you don't know a single thing about those kinds of drugs, yet you keep posting like yours some kind of authority.
The people trying to destroy Cosby love the fact that you're as ignorant as you are btw, idk why you think a quaalude and a roofie are the same thing but they're not
Please try again
I know plenty about drugs. You seem to miss the basic point that sleeping with someone unconscious or so far gone is illegal regardless and that is what qualifies it as ? ...and not all of them said they willingly took the drugs. Some have said Cosby gave them a drink and they felt weird afterwards but had no clue what he put in it. You ask for evidence..are shown Cosby admitting to giving women drugs to have sex with them..and still ask "where's the proof" when he is openly admitting to doing exactly what many of the victims claim.
And you keep repeating yourself.
Why?
Once again, every female that testified in that deposition stated that they knowingly took the drugs. What females are you talking about?
I'm going to feed your future daughter pills and ? her in the ass.
Get it?
No broad outside of his wife would ? Bill Cosby's pudding eating ass.
-
harry knucklez wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this.
That's how the legal system works ace
Somebody why is your ? ? being prosecuted then?
You mean why is he being prosecuted a half-century after the alleged crimes happened right?
Why wasn't he prosecuted when the crimes happened? Why did this new chick file a civil suit and settle if it wasn't just a money grab?
Why are you calling Cosby my ? ? ? Is it because I know how to reason and think logically? You still haven't provided any evidence of rapes 1-10 or any of them like I requested before
Half century? This charge is from something 10 years ago. This is how I know you know few details about what you're actually defending because you keep using the same points despite being told repeatedly they're incorrect facts you're going off of.
You actually didn't even fully read my post but I won't fault you for that, you don't seem to know what you're talking about anyway, and you're posting emotionally instead of objectively
Now please misread this post and make another ignorant comment
I did read your post. Your going off misinformation and every time you're presented with a different opinion from yours you give the same response. Instead of actually considering your facts you're using are wrong you just claim others are being emotional.
Nope I actually mentioned the new chick ony 2nd paragraph of that post
Anything else you got from my post is in your own head
Please tell me what facts I've posted besides the fact that you ? have no evidence to indict Cosby with?
Why can't you gullible ? stay focused? Y'all are bending over backwards trying to change the subject
Your post said he's being prosecuted for half century old crimes and he's not. This is for one from 2004. Your own words. ..and your question about how come charges weren't brought up before you've also been told multiple times a prosecutor has come out and said they wanted to bring charges in the past but didn't because of lack of evidence. Your questions are being answered but you don't like the answers so you're fishing for more instead of considering the reality that the answers really may just be some ? you don't like or want to accept.
And I also mentioned the new chick that filed a CIVIL SUIT AFTER BEING ? THEN TOOK A SETTLEMENT
Do you know what a civil suit it?
How old are you btw? This is like the 5th+ time I've had to simplify already simple things for you
I already know there's a lack of evidence, you seem to be the one on denial
Trust me, I'm not fishing for anything, how about you fish for some proof that Cosby ? somebody instead of trying to change the subject AGAIN
And when you can't find any, ask yourself what you're really doing in this threadIn the deposition, Cosby said he fondled Constand that night, taking her silence as a green light. Constand maintains she was semi-conscious after he gave her pills he said would relax her.
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/investigations/Bill-Cosby-Montgomery-County-Charges-363817451.html
From the same deposition he admits to giving women qualudes....how much more proof do you need he was out here messing with women while they were too far under the influence to consent to anything?
Wait so you have no evidence that he taped anyone so now you're trying to shift the discussion but I'm gonna keep you right on subject
Like I JUST SAOD LIKE 30 MINUTES AGO, EVERYONE IN THAT DEPOSITION TESTIFIED TO KNOWINGLY TAKING DRUGS
Yes, including the females
Have you take quaaludes or any drugs at all? Do you know what they do? From your posts I'm pretty sure you don't know a single thing about those kinds of drugs, yet you keep posting like yours some kind of authority.
The people trying to destroy Cosby love the fact that you're as ignorant as you are btw, idk why you think a quaalude and a roofie are the same thing but they're not
Please try again
I know plenty about drugs. You seem to miss the basic point that sleeping with someone unconscious or so far gone is illegal regardless and that is what qualifies it as ? ...and not all of them said they willingly took the drugs. Some have said Cosby gave them a drink and they felt weird afterwards but had no clue what he put in it. You ask for evidence..are shown Cosby admitting to giving women drugs to have sex with them..and still ask "where's the proof" when he is openly admitting to doing exactly what many of the victims claim.
And you keep repeating yourself.
Why?
Once again, every female that testified in that deposition stated that they knowingly took the drugs. What females are you talking about?
Read actress Beverly Johnson's accusation against him.
Her own former manager say that she lying about that ? .
-
5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this.
That's how the legal system works ace
Somebody why is your ? ? being prosecuted then?
You mean why is he being prosecuted a half-century after the alleged crimes happened right?
Why wasn't he prosecuted when the crimes happened? Why did this new chick file a civil suit and settle if it wasn't just a money grab?
Why are you calling Cosby my ? ? ? Is it because I know how to reason and think logically? You still haven't provided any evidence of rapes 1-10 or any of them like I requested before
Half century? This charge is from something 10 years ago. This is how I know you know few details about what you're actually defending because you keep using the same points despite being told repeatedly they're incorrect facts you're going off of.
You actually didn't even fully read my post but I won't fault you for that, you don't seem to know what you're talking about anyway, and you're posting emotionally instead of objectively
Now please misread this post and make another ignorant comment
I did read your post. Your going off misinformation and every time you're presented with a different opinion from yours you give the same response. Instead of actually considering your facts you're using are wrong you just claim others are being emotional.
Nope I actually mentioned the new chick ony 2nd paragraph of that post
Anything else you got from my post is in your own head
Please tell me what facts I've posted besides the fact that you ? have no evidence to indict Cosby with?
Why can't you gullible ? stay focused? Y'all are bending over backwards trying to change the subject
Your post said he's being prosecuted for half century old crimes and he's not. This is for one from 2004. Your own words. ..and your question about how come charges weren't brought up before you've also been told multiple times a prosecutor has come out and said they wanted to bring charges in the past but didn't because of lack of evidence. Your questions are being answered but you don't like the answers so you're fishing for more instead of considering the reality that the answers really may just be some ? you don't like or want to accept.
And I also mentioned the new chick that filed a CIVIL SUIT AFTER BEING ? THEN TOOK A SETTLEMENT
Do you know what a civil suit it?
How old are you btw? This is like the 5th+ time I've had to simplify already simple things for you
I already know there's a lack of evidence, you seem to be the one on denial
Trust me, I'm not fishing for anything, how about you fish for some proof that Cosby ? somebody instead of trying to change the subject AGAIN
And when you can't find any, ask yourself what you're really doing in this threadIn the deposition, Cosby said he fondled Constand that night, taking her silence as a green light. Constand maintains she was semi-conscious after he gave her pills he said would relax her.
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/investigations/Bill-Cosby-Montgomery-County-Charges-363817451.html
From the same deposition he admits to giving women qualudes....how much more proof do you need he was out here messing with women while they were too far under the influence to consent to anything?
Wait so you have no evidence that he taped anyone so now you're trying to shift the discussion but I'm gonna keep you right on subject
Like I JUST SAOD LIKE 30 MINUTES AGO, EVERYONE IN THAT DEPOSITION TESTIFIED TO KNOWINGLY TAKING DRUGS
Yes, including the females
Have you take quaaludes or any drugs at all? Do you know what they do? From your posts I'm pretty sure you don't know a single thing about those kinds of drugs, yet you keep posting like yours some kind of authority.
The people trying to destroy Cosby love the fact that you're as ignorant as you are btw, idk why you think a quaalude and a roofie are the same thing but they're not
Please try again
I know plenty about drugs. You seem to miss the basic point that sleeping with someone unconscious or so far gone is illegal regardless and that is what qualifies it as ? ...and not all of them said they willingly took the drugs. Some have said Cosby gave them a drink and they felt weird afterwards but had no clue what he put in it. You ask for evidence..are shown Cosby admitting to giving women drugs to have sex with them..and still ask "where's the proof" when he is openly admitting to doing exactly what many of the victims claim.
And you keep repeating yourself.
Why?
Once again, every female that testified in that deposition stated that they knowingly took the drugs. What females are you talking about?
Read actress Beverly Johnson's accusation against him.
I did
And you're grasping. -
5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this.
That's how the legal system works ace
Somebody why is your ? ? being prosecuted then?
You mean why is he being prosecuted a half-century after the alleged crimes happened right?
Why wasn't he prosecuted when the crimes happened? Why did this new chick file a civil suit and settle if it wasn't just a money grab?
Why are you calling Cosby my ? ? ? Is it because I know how to reason and think logically? You still haven't provided any evidence of rapes 1-10 or any of them like I requested before
Half century? This charge is from something 10 years ago. This is how I know you know few details about what you're actually defending because you keep using the same points despite being told repeatedly they're incorrect facts you're going off of.
You actually didn't even fully read my post but I won't fault you for that, you don't seem to know what you're talking about anyway, and you're posting emotionally instead of objectively
Now please misread this post and make another ignorant comment
I did read your post. Your going off misinformation and every time you're presented with a different opinion from yours you give the same response. Instead of actually considering your facts you're using are wrong you just claim others are being emotional.
Nope I actually mentioned the new chick ony 2nd paragraph of that post
Anything else you got from my post is in your own head
Please tell me what facts I've posted besides the fact that you ? have no evidence to indict Cosby with?
Why can't you gullible ? stay focused? Y'all are bending over backwards trying to change the subject
Your post said he's being prosecuted for half century old crimes and he's not. This is for one from 2004. Your own words. ..and your question about how come charges weren't brought up before you've also been told multiple times a prosecutor has come out and said they wanted to bring charges in the past but didn't because of lack of evidence. Your questions are being answered but you don't like the answers so you're fishing for more instead of considering the reality that the answers really may just be some ? you don't like or want to accept.
And I also mentioned the new chick that filed a CIVIL SUIT AFTER BEING ? THEN TOOK A SETTLEMENT
Do you know what a civil suit it?
How old are you btw? This is like the 5th+ time I've had to simplify already simple things for you
I already know there's a lack of evidence, you seem to be the one on denial
Trust me, I'm not fishing for anything, how about you fish for some proof that Cosby ? somebody instead of trying to change the subject AGAIN
And when you can't find any, ask yourself what you're really doing in this threadIn the deposition, Cosby said he fondled Constand that night, taking her silence as a green light. Constand maintains she was semi-conscious after he gave her pills he said would relax her.
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/investigations/Bill-Cosby-Montgomery-County-Charges-363817451.html
From the same deposition he admits to giving women qualudes....how much more proof do you need he was out here messing with women while they were too far under the influence to consent to anything?
Wait so you have no evidence that he taped anyone so now you're trying to shift the discussion but I'm gonna keep you right on subject
Like I JUST SAOD LIKE 30 MINUTES AGO, EVERYONE IN THAT DEPOSITION TESTIFIED TO KNOWINGLY TAKING DRUGS
Yes, including the females
Have you take quaaludes or any drugs at all? Do you know what they do? From your posts I'm pretty sure you don't know a single thing about those kinds of drugs, yet you keep posting like yours some kind of authority.
The people trying to destroy Cosby love the fact that you're as ignorant as you are btw, idk why you think a quaalude and a roofie are the same thing but they're not
Please try again
What do you think quaaludes do?
I know what they do, they sedate you and they enhance sex
I'm sure all those people in the club's popping them and ? each other back in the 70s REALLY just wanted to go to sleep in the club
They were all ?
So the sedation isn't a red flag. Ok...
Not if you CHOOSE TO TAKE IT -
harry knucklez wrote: »@xxCivicxx honey, if your idol wasn't guilty of anything, and was so morally righteous, why did he pay these women?
Because people like you don't care about facts and will continue to slander a grown man who has accomplished much greater things than you based off of the gossip of old birds
So he, just like most rich people in the spotlight getting shaken down have done, chose to stamp out a small fire early before more people like yourself heard the made up claims and tried to crucify him over gossip
People like myself who discuss this over a message board? That's crucifying him?harry knucklez wrote: »https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i3IKHUzf6Y
@ 6:21 mark.
Not all of these women weren't even drugged. This chick claims that on the set of a movie, Bill just stuck his ? in her mouth and nutted all over her clothes. She conveniently left out the fact that she sucked his ? , but regardless, if it went down like that, why didn't she go to the police afterwards? Them ? stains on her clothes would've been evidence, that ? don't just wipe off. Ask Monica Lewinsky.
Not all women who are ? go to the police. A whole lot do not.
I understand that but I firmly believe that some of the hoes in this case are lying.
I don't care if some are lying. I'm damn near positive every single woman who's ever accused him is not
So you finally have proof? -
harry knucklez wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this.
That's how the legal system works ace
Somebody why is your ? ? being prosecuted then?
You mean why is he being prosecuted a half-century after the alleged crimes happened right?
Why wasn't he prosecuted when the crimes happened? Why did this new chick file a civil suit and settle if it wasn't just a money grab?
Why are you calling Cosby my ? ? ? Is it because I know how to reason and think logically? You still haven't provided any evidence of rapes 1-10 or any of them like I requested before
Half century? This charge is from something 10 years ago. This is how I know you know few details about what you're actually defending because you keep using the same points despite being told repeatedly they're incorrect facts you're going off of.
You actually didn't even fully read my post but I won't fault you for that, you don't seem to know what you're talking about anyway, and you're posting emotionally instead of objectively
Now please misread this post and make another ignorant comment
I did read your post. Your going off misinformation and every time you're presented with a different opinion from yours you give the same response. Instead of actually considering your facts you're using are wrong you just claim others are being emotional.
Nope I actually mentioned the new chick ony 2nd paragraph of that post
Anything else you got from my post is in your own head
Please tell me what facts I've posted besides the fact that you ? have no evidence to indict Cosby with?
Why can't you gullible ? stay focused? Y'all are bending over backwards trying to change the subject
Your post said he's being prosecuted for half century old crimes and he's not. This is for one from 2004. Your own words. ..and your question about how come charges weren't brought up before you've also been told multiple times a prosecutor has come out and said they wanted to bring charges in the past but didn't because of lack of evidence. Your questions are being answered but you don't like the answers so you're fishing for more instead of considering the reality that the answers really may just be some ? you don't like or want to accept.
And I also mentioned the new chick that filed a CIVIL SUIT AFTER BEING ? THEN TOOK A SETTLEMENT
Do you know what a civil suit it?
How old are you btw? This is like the 5th+ time I've had to simplify already simple things for you
I already know there's a lack of evidence, you seem to be the one on denial
Trust me, I'm not fishing for anything, how about you fish for some proof that Cosby ? somebody instead of trying to change the subject AGAIN
And when you can't find any, ask yourself what you're really doing in this threadIn the deposition, Cosby said he fondled Constand that night, taking her silence as a green light. Constand maintains she was semi-conscious after he gave her pills he said would relax her.
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/investigations/Bill-Cosby-Montgomery-County-Charges-363817451.html
From the same deposition he admits to giving women qualudes....how much more proof do you need he was out here messing with women while they were too far under the influence to consent to anything?
Wait so you have no evidence that he taped anyone so now you're trying to shift the discussion but I'm gonna keep you right on subject
Like I JUST SAOD LIKE 30 MINUTES AGO, EVERYONE IN THAT DEPOSITION TESTIFIED TO KNOWINGLY TAKING DRUGS
Yes, including the females
Have you take quaaludes or any drugs at all? Do you know what they do? From your posts I'm pretty sure you don't know a single thing about those kinds of drugs, yet you keep posting like yours some kind of authority.
The people trying to destroy Cosby love the fact that you're as ignorant as you are btw, idk why you think a quaalude and a roofie are the same thing but they're not
Please try again
I know plenty about drugs. You seem to miss the basic point that sleeping with someone unconscious or so far gone is illegal regardless and that is what qualifies it as ? ...and not all of them said they willingly took the drugs. Some have said Cosby gave them a drink and they felt weird afterwards but had no clue what he put in it. You ask for evidence..are shown Cosby admitting to giving women drugs to have sex with them..and still ask "where's the proof" when he is openly admitting to doing exactly what many of the victims claim.
And you keep repeating yourself.
Why?
Once again, every female that testified in that deposition stated that they knowingly took the drugs. What females are you talking about?
Read actress Beverly Johnson's accusation against him.
Her own former manager say that she lying about that ? .
He's running out if misinformation to hide behind -
Janice Dickerson said in her autobiography that Bill Cosby blew her off cause she didn't wanna sleep with him, so she's suing him for defamation for calling her a liar for her ? allegations.
-
TheManInBlack4.0 wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this.
That's how the legal system works ace
Somebody why is your ? ? being prosecuted then?
You mean why is he being prosecuted a half-century after the alleged crimes happened right?
Why wasn't he prosecuted when the crimes happened? Why did this new chick file a civil suit and settle if it wasn't just a money grab?
Why are you calling Cosby my ? ? ? Is it because I know how to reason and think logically? You still haven't provided any evidence of rapes 1-10 or any of them like I requested before
Half century? This charge is from something 10 years ago. This is how I know you know few details about what you're actually defending because you keep using the same points despite being told repeatedly they're incorrect facts you're going off of.
You actually didn't even fully read my post but I won't fault you for that, you don't seem to know what you're talking about anyway, and you're posting emotionally instead of objectively
Now please misread this post and make another ignorant comment
I did read your post. Your going off misinformation and every time you're presented with a different opinion from yours you give the same response. Instead of actually considering your facts you're using are wrong you just claim others are being emotional.
Nope I actually mentioned the new chick ony 2nd paragraph of that post
Anything else you got from my post is in your own head
Please tell me what facts I've posted besides the fact that you ? have no evidence to indict Cosby with?
Why can't you gullible ? stay focused? Y'all are bending over backwards trying to change the subject
Your post said he's being prosecuted for half century old crimes and he's not. This is for one from 2004. Your own words. ..and your question about how come charges weren't brought up before you've also been told multiple times a prosecutor has come out and said they wanted to bring charges in the past but didn't because of lack of evidence. Your questions are being answered but you don't like the answers so you're fishing for more instead of considering the reality that the answers really may just be some ? you don't like or want to accept.
And I also mentioned the new chick that filed a CIVIL SUIT AFTER BEING ? THEN TOOK A SETTLEMENT
Do you know what a civil suit it?
How old are you btw? This is like the 5th+ time I've had to simplify already simple things for you
I already know there's a lack of evidence, you seem to be the one on denial
Trust me, I'm not fishing for anything, how about you fish for some proof that Cosby ? somebody instead of trying to change the subject AGAIN
And when you can't find any, ask yourself what you're really doing in this threadIn the deposition, Cosby said he fondled Constand that night, taking her silence as a green light. Constand maintains she was semi-conscious after he gave her pills he said would relax her.
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/investigations/Bill-Cosby-Montgomery-County-Charges-363817451.html
From the same deposition he admits to giving women qualudes....how much more proof do you need he was out here messing with women while they were too far under the influence to consent to anything?
Wait so you have no evidence that he taped anyone so now you're trying to shift the discussion but I'm gonna keep you right on subject
Like I JUST SAOD LIKE 30 MINUTES AGO, EVERYONE IN THAT DEPOSITION TESTIFIED TO KNOWINGLY TAKING DRUGS
Yes, including the females
Have you take quaaludes or any drugs at all? Do you know what they do? From your posts I'm pretty sure you don't know a single thing about those kinds of drugs, yet you keep posting like yours some kind of authority.
The people trying to destroy Cosby love the fact that you're as ignorant as you are btw, idk why you think a quaalude and a roofie are the same thing but they're not
Please try again
I know plenty about drugs. You seem to miss the basic point that sleeping with someone unconscious or so far gone is illegal regardless and that is what qualifies it as ? ...and not all of them said they willingly took the drugs. Some have said Cosby gave them a drink and they felt weird afterwards but had no clue what he put in it. You ask for evidence..are shown Cosby admitting to giving women drugs to have sex with them..and still ask "where's the proof" when he is openly admitting to doing exactly what many of the victims claim.
And you keep repeating yourself.
Why?
Once again, every female that testified in that deposition stated that they knowingly took the drugs. What females are you talking about?
I'm going to feed your future daughter pills and ? her in the ass.
Get it?
No broad outside of his wife would ? Bill Cosby's pudding eating ass.
Emotional, feminine post
Another weak attempt at changing the subject -
harry knucklez wrote: »@xxCivicxx honey, if your idol wasn't guilty of anything, and was so morally righteous, why did he pay these women?
Because people like you don't care about facts and will continue to slander a grown man who has accomplished much greater things than you based off of the gossip of old birds
So he, just like most rich people in the spotlight getting shaken down have done, chose to stamp out a small fire early before more people like yourself heard the made up claims and tried to crucify him over gossip
People like myself who discuss this over a message board? That's crucifying him?harry knucklez wrote: »https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i3IKHUzf6Y
@ 6:21 mark.
Not all of these women weren't even drugged. This chick claims that on the set of a movie, Bill just stuck his ? in her mouth and nutted all over her clothes. She conveniently left out the fact that she sucked his ? , but regardless, if it went down like that, why didn't she go to the police afterwards? Them ? stains on her clothes would've been evidence, that ? don't just wipe off. Ask Monica Lewinsky.
Not all women who are ? go to the police. A whole lot do not.
I understand that but I firmly believe that some of the hoes in this case are lying.
I don't care if some are lying. I'm damn near positive every single woman who's ever accused him is not
So you finally have proof?
You're the weirdo who thinks he's Cosby's defense lawyer. All the proof I need is what I've already seen, my opinion can't convict him, nor set him free. -
5th Letter wrote: »babelipsss wrote: »White women don't need evidence.
What the hell would count as evidence in this situation? And why would the alleged victim be responsible for presenting it?
If I accuse you of something the burden of proof is on me to prove you did it. Not for me to accuse you then you prove me wrong. If she claims he did it, she needs to prove it.
So you're saying if you get robbed you gotta go to the police with evidence that you got robbed?
Please tell me you understand the legal system better than this.
That's how the legal system works ace
Somebody why is your ? ? being prosecuted then?
You mean why is he being prosecuted a half-century after the alleged crimes happened right?
Why wasn't he prosecuted when the crimes happened? Why did this new chick file a civil suit and settle if it wasn't just a money grab?
Why are you calling Cosby my ? ? ? Is it because I know how to reason and think logically? You still haven't provided any evidence of rapes 1-10 or any of them like I requested before
Half century? This charge is from something 10 years ago. This is how I know you know few details about what you're actually defending because you keep using the same points despite being told repeatedly they're incorrect facts you're going off of.
You actually didn't even fully read my post but I won't fault you for that, you don't seem to know what you're talking about anyway, and you're posting emotionally instead of objectively
Now please misread this post and make another ignorant comment
I did read your post. Your going off misinformation and every time you're presented with a different opinion from yours you give the same response. Instead of actually considering your facts you're using are wrong you just claim others are being emotional.
Nope I actually mentioned the new chick ony 2nd paragraph of that post
Anything else you got from my post is in your own head
Please tell me what facts I've posted besides the fact that you ? have no evidence to indict Cosby with?
Why can't you gullible ? stay focused? Y'all are bending over backwards trying to change the subject
Your post said he's being prosecuted for half century old crimes and he's not. This is for one from 2004. Your own words. ..and your question about how come charges weren't brought up before you've also been told multiple times a prosecutor has come out and said they wanted to bring charges in the past but didn't because of lack of evidence. Your questions are being answered but you don't like the answers so you're fishing for more instead of considering the reality that the answers really may just be some ? you don't like or want to accept.
And I also mentioned the new chick that filed a CIVIL SUIT AFTER BEING ? THEN TOOK A SETTLEMENT
Do you know what a civil suit it?
How old are you btw? This is like the 5th+ time I've had to simplify already simple things for you
I already know there's a lack of evidence, you seem to be the one on denial
Trust me, I'm not fishing for anything, how about you fish for some proof that Cosby ? somebody instead of trying to change the subject AGAIN
And when you can't find any, ask yourself what you're really doing in this threadIn the deposition, Cosby said he fondled Constand that night, taking her silence as a green light. Constand maintains she was semi-conscious after he gave her pills he said would relax her.
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/investigations/Bill-Cosby-Montgomery-County-Charges-363817451.html
From the same deposition he admits to giving women qualudes....how much more proof do you need he was out here messing with women while they were too far under the influence to consent to anything?
Wait so you have no evidence that he taped anyone so now you're trying to shift the discussion but I'm gonna keep you right on subject
Like I JUST SAOD LIKE 30 MINUTES AGO, EVERYONE IN THAT DEPOSITION TESTIFIED TO KNOWINGLY TAKING DRUGS
Yes, including the females
Have you take quaaludes or any drugs at all? Do you know what they do? From your posts I'm pretty sure you don't know a single thing about those kinds of drugs, yet you keep posting like yours some kind of authority.
The people trying to destroy Cosby love the fact that you're as ignorant as you are btw, idk why you think a quaalude and a roofie are the same thing but they're not
Please try again
What do you think quaaludes do?
I know what they do, they sedate you and they enhance sex
I'm sure all those people in the club's popping them and ? each other back in the 70s REALLY just wanted to go to sleep in the club
They were all ?
So the sedation isn't a red flag. Ok...
Not if you CHOOSE TO TAKE IT
Ok...so your idol is a weirdo who likes to ? still women. Like a corpse. That's normal...your overzealous defense of him is just as normal. -
harry knucklez wrote: »@xxCivicxx honey, if your idol wasn't guilty of anything, and was so morally righteous, why did he pay these women?
Because people like you don't care about facts and will continue to slander a grown man who has accomplished much greater things than you based off of the gossip of old birds
So he, just like most rich people in the spotlight getting shaken down have done, chose to stamp out a small fire early before more people like yourself heard the made up claims and tried to crucify him over gossip
People like myself who discuss this over a message board? That's crucifying him?harry knucklez wrote: »https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7i3IKHUzf6Y
@ 6:21 mark.
Not all of these women weren't even drugged. This chick claims that on the set of a movie, Bill just stuck his ? in her mouth and nutted all over her clothes. She conveniently left out the fact that she sucked his ? , but regardless, if it went down like that, why didn't she go to the police afterwards? Them ? stains on her clothes would've been evidence, that ? don't just wipe off. Ask Monica Lewinsky.
Not all women who are ? go to the police. A whole lot do not.
I understand that but I firmly believe that some of the hoes in this case are lying.
I don't care if some are lying. I'm damn near positive every single woman who's ever accused him is not
So you finally have proof?
You're the weirdo who thinks he's Cosby's defense lawyer. All the proof I need is what I've already seen, my opinion can't convict him, nor set him free.
Just like I thought, all deflection no evidence
Please show me what you have seen that decided this issue for you in your mind so I can properly laugh at it and make fun of you
