Hillary just MOLLYWOPPED Sanders with black voters lol damn
Options
Comments
-
Just the other week she was boasting about henry Kissinger liking her work
He might be a bigger war criminal than Cheney -
Hilary is a liar. The only thing worse than being a liar is being a cac liar. Only thing worse than being a cac liar is a female cac liar. and she look like she only ? missionary....can't trust it
-
As for anti deregulation, in regards to the banks there isn't much more that needs to be done that the Dodd Frank act of 09 doesn't cover (which tightly regulates banks and certain economic provisions).
One act allows the banks to jump through gaping loopholes.
One act did not.
If one act allows certain parts of the regulation to "not be enforced" then it probably needs to be disposed of in favor of the Act that didn't allow certain rules to be curtailed.
Might I also add that Glass-Steagall wasn't repealed until 1999 at the end of the Clinton Presidency after the economic boom of the 1990's. The economic decline followed soon there after.
That's not why we entered into recession in 2001 or 2008-2009 tho. Do your homework and then come back.
Shadow banks that conduct maturity, credit, and liquidity transformation without access to central bank assets or public sector credit guarantees (like AIG and Lehman) operate outside of the normal banking regulatory system.
The 2008-2009 financial crisis became a problem explicitly because the too big to fail banks were underwriting the risky bets those operations made. The big banks were only able to do so because the Glass-Steagall Act had been repealed. I know my ? . There is no homework that I need to do as a result of some perceived lack of "knowledge" on the situation. -
Just the other week she was boasting about henry Kissinger liking her work
He might be a bigger war criminal than Cheney
Lol don't say that in here. Your knowledge of American politics and foreign affairs will be called into question. Kissinger was a genius and a saint. -
@Kai I respect what your saying I just don't agree with some of what Sanders is proposing.
how tho sway? lol
everything he is proposing we have in canada already. i just heard about the free university think we're getting in 2017 here. it's about damn time america moved into the present with the rest of the developed world. it makes absolutely no ? sense that americans do not have universal healthcare in "the greatest country in the world," and that should be completely unacceptable
Europe started the free college movement in Germany I believe and Hillary is pushing the same agenda. I agree with the Universal health care. I think Hillary tried to push for that in the 90s and was shut down by big business. This was documented in Michael Moore's documentary.
hillary is pushing that ? now that she sees bernie doing it and it's working for him. she stays just copying evrything he does when she sees it works. that right there is my biggest problem with her, she has NO PRINCIPLES, she does whatever she thinks will work for her at that time. if she thinks calling black kids super-predators works for her at that moment she will say it, even if she wasn't pro the iraq war that didn't stop her from saying she was because it served her politically. so don't think she won't throw minorities under the bus again when it suits her.
bernie has a voting record that no one who cares simply about their political career would have. he was voting against DOMA back in the earlie 90s which hillary supported just until a few years ago when all of a suddent it was politically winning to be pro-? marriage
i do not trust hillary to say what she means and really stand up fpr what she believes in cuz i don't think she believes or stand for anything. willing to donate to her and get her votes, she's willing to say anything you want to her. that's what i don't like about her. bernie on the other hand has been pro-civil rights from day one for all, his record shows he voted that way, what he says shows he believes in and stands for something, and his actions and words remaining the same over his entire career shows that he means and stands by what he says.
the bernie you got yesterday is the same one you'll get today or 2 years from now. You never know which hillary you are getting cuz you never know her motivations for actions. are we getting the new pro-minority rights hillary or are we getting the hillary that thinks our children are "super predators" "who lack any conscience" and deserve to be locked up for life? that's why the hashtag #whichhillary is trending
Hillary is a wolf IDGAF what anyone says LOLOL, she's a wolf I know a wolf when I see one. I also agree that Bernie means well and is a real dude. Hillary is a stone cold politician just like her predecessors. I like politicians for their policies and have proven to do but I never really trust the perception they want us to believe about them.
Obama was saying a lot of the things Sanders was and got elected twice. A good question to ask ourselves is why doesn't Bernie's party agree with that and back him ? Hillary even beat Obama for the popular vote in 08 and the delegates still picked Obama as their nominee. That's what prompted me to originally raise the eyebrow. What is she saying now that all of a sudden has them backing her in droves over Sanders ? If Trump is going to be such an easy target why does it matter who the democrats pick ? Shouldn't Sanders be their selection ? There are even polls saying that Sanders would fare better against Trump than Hillary. But yet he barely has endorsements, support from his party, has no delegates and isn't winning states. On top of that he's raising a lot of money too. That don't look right to me....
That's has a whole lot more to do with Obama than it does Sanders. The establishment knew about Obama what we didn't. They knew he was one of them and wouldn't push forward with any of those uber progressive ideas he was preaching. He served as a continuation of establishment ideals in a more marketable package (being able to mobilize the young and minority base). And that was fine for the time because it was far better than anything the republicans were offering. -
She said nothing for me to be offended by tho. She stating her opinion. I respect Kai and she showing up most of the men in here.
We grown and I welcome healthy debate.
YO, man how many more generations are going to debate on the same topics???? THE SOCIALIST thing does not work any form of it is doomed to long term failure. Traditional SOCIALISM, national SOCIALISM, democratic SOCIALISM any form of SOCIALISM will end in failure. -
@Kai I respect what your saying I just don't agree with some of what Sanders is proposing.
how tho sway? lol
everything he is proposing we have in canada already. i just heard about the free university think we're getting in 2017 here. it's about damn time america moved into the present with the rest of the developed world. it makes absolutely no ? sense that americans do not have universal healthcare in "the greatest country in the world," and that should be completely unacceptable
Europe started the free college movement in Germany I believe and Hillary is pushing the same agenda. I agree with the Universal health care. I think Hillary tried to push for that in the 90s and was shut down by big business. This was documented in Michael Moore's documentary.
hillary is pushing that ? now that she sees bernie doing it and it's working for him. she stays just copying evrything he does when she sees it works. that right there is my biggest problem with her, she has NO PRINCIPLES, she does whatever she thinks will work for her at that time. if she thinks calling black kids super-predators works for her at that moment she will say it, even if she wasn't pro the iraq war that didn't stop her from saying she was because it served her politically. so don't think she won't throw minorities under the bus again when it suits her.
bernie has a voting record that no one who cares simply about their political career would have. he was voting against DOMA back in the earlie 90s which hillary supported just until a few years ago when all of a suddent it was politically winning to be pro-? marriage
i do not trust hillary to say what she means and really stand up fpr what she believes in cuz i don't think she believes or stand for anything. willing to donate to her and get her votes, she's willing to say anything you want to her. that's what i don't like about her. bernie on the other hand has been pro-civil rights from day one for all, his record shows he voted that way, what he says shows he believes in and stands for something, and his actions and words remaining the same over his entire career shows that he means and stands by what he says.
the bernie you got yesterday is the same one you'll get today or 2 years from now. You never know which hillary you are getting cuz you never know her motivations for actions. are we getting the new pro-minority rights hillary or are we getting the hillary that thinks our children are "super predators" "who lack any conscience" and deserve to be locked up for life? that's why the hashtag #whichhillary is trending
Hillary is a wolf IDGAF what anyone says LOLOL, she's a wolf I know a wolf when I see one. I also agree that Bernie means well and is a real dude. Hillary is a stone cold politician just like her predecessors. I like politicians for their policies and have proven to do but I never really trust the perception they want us to believe about them.
Obama was saying a lot of the things Sanders was and got elected twice. A good question to ask ourselves is why doesn't Bernie's party agree with that and back him ? Hillary even beat Obama for the popular vote in 08 and the delegates still picked Obama as their nominee. That's what prompted me to originally raise the eyebrow. What is she saying now that all of a sudden has them backing her in droves over Sanders ? If Trump is going to be such an easy target why does it matter who the democrats pick ? Shouldn't Sanders be their selection ? There are even polls saying that Sanders would fare better against Trump than Hillary. But yet he barely has endorsements, support from his party, has no delegates and isn't winning states. On top of that he's raising a lot of money too. That don't look right to me....
That's has a whole lot more to do with Obama than it does Sanders. The establishment knew about Obama what we didn't. They knew he was one of them and wouldn't push forward with any of those uber progressive ideas he was preaching. He served as a continuation of establishment ideals in a more marketable package (being able to mobilize the young and minority base). And that was fine for the time because it was far better than anything the republicans were offering.
So what made a black man, a community organiser turned senator more important to the establishment than the wife of a former president, with a lengthy track record for foreign policy, who had more money, more endorsements more capable than one of their own who was apart of the establishment for decades ? They said Obama had no experience, he was a lot younger than Sanders, said he was going to make Wall Street pay, said he was going to increase taxes on them, said he would bring forth a universal healthcare system, said he opposed the wars, said he wasn't a friend of big banks, even had Jeremiah Wright (I might have gotten the name wrong) the pastor spewing anti-Semitic and truths about the hypocrisy of American politics and racism and he still won against Hillary despite losing the popular vote. Why is she now getting all the love over Sanders who's very similar to that today with the things he's echoing ?
I'm asking the question, I think it's quite interesting..... Is Sanders really that different from Obama ???
Obama was a Democratic establishment darling...Bernie Sanders isn't even a member of the Democratic Party. -
Obama did a great job with the mess that was made before him.
Give props when it's due. -
Lmao ? really going to vote for Hillary, the one who called our youth super predators? The one who's husband set laws that disproportionately affected blacks? The one that endorsed a segregationalist?
Yall disgust me -
And all the stuff we need to know about Hillary is right there in front of us, but a lot of black folks still suffer from the scared ? mentality. Hillary is no friend to the black community but don't tell them that, in there minds Bill is still the 1st black president and he gave us jobs.thefabmd2dc wrote: »black people just dont know anything about bernie
so that L was always gonna come
-
A RECESSION IS COMING You YOUNG BERNIE SANDERS SUPPORTERS HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!!!!!!!! IF you get what you want and elect bernie sanders and he gets what he wants WE ARE ALL GOING TO SUFFER. Because employers are not going to hire anybody especially a young person if they have to PAY THAT PERSON FOR 12 WEEKS VACATION.
? OUT OF HERE i can't believe this whole generation is so ? lazy and entitled. YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO A LEVEL OF PAY THAT YOU DON'T WORK FOR or to wage that does not make it worthwhile for your employers to hire you at THAT LEVEL.
LoL...Personally I don't think any of them have clean hands. The only thing I disagree with is Bernie's policies. I think his policies need to be better elaborated on and changed in multiple regards. I think he says things he knows won't and cannot be done but is saying them because it might get him elected. I think his policies are bad for the economy and undo what Obama has done. I wouldn't vote for either but if you held a gun to my head I'd pick Hillary off the strength she has slightly better economic plan and is a woman (yeah a said it). Bernie's hands aren't clean and he doesn't give a ? about ? either. Bernie voted against Assata Shakur and her entire movement overwhelmingly on two occasions and gave no answer for it.
As for anti deregulation, in regards to the banks there isn't much more that needs to be done that the Dodd Frank act of 09 doesn't cover (which tightly regulates banks and certain economic provisions). He's saying the economy is in the toilet when unemployment is at record lows and the economy is growing. Taxes will be raised on them and they'll be less profitable in the long run but you'll never stop Wall Street. They are a necessary evil just as taxes are.
As for Hillary I'm going to have to look deeper into that for real.
Dude, I think you're missing context. He's a stepping stone. He has said time and time again that he cannot implement said changes. That things might not change at all while he's in office. He hasn't been coy or deceitful. He's asking people to rise up. If you (not you) feel a certain way, you'll do that: if not, you won't. That means the average person needs to get informed and get involved.
Social mobility is stagnant or trending downwards for the middle and working class. Globalization and deregulation have been disastrous for the average American. Austerity measures have literally been killing the poor; E.g., Flint. And since the recession 91% of all new and untaxed income has gone to the top 1% of our population (http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/apr/19/bernie-s/bernie-sanders-says-99-percent-new-income-going-to/).
(This is of course eschewing reallocation, it's more like 40% while the bottom 50% of America holds 11%.)
Cost of living has risen 67% since 1990 and wages have not kept up. The minimum wage has only risen 21%. Our major employers are Wal Mart (1) Yum Foods (2) McDonalds (3). These are largely minimum wage jobs. How is the average citizen supposed to live? How are people supposed to catch up? I won't even get into the rising cost of education.
Laissez faire capitalism and the pipe dream of rugged individualism has turned our social safety net into a bizzarro world cottage industry for the super rich. They can make record profits while ? their employees and we foot the bill.
The utter myopia of it all is staggering.
It is now accepted as fact that our politicians are bought and sold. Things are ? up here.
This is about having a politician who represents the will of the people not big money, and creating a domino effect. We need a complete paradigm shift and I don't care how many rich people get hurt in the process. ? em.
-
A RECESSION IS COMING You YOUNG BERNIE SANDERS SUPPORTERS HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!!!!!!!! IF you get what you want and elect bernie sanders and he gets what he wants WE ARE ALL GOING TO SUFFER. Because employers are not going to hire anybody especially a young person if they have to PAY THAT PERSON FOR 12 WEEKS VACATION.
? OUT OF HERE i can't believe this whole generation is so ? lazy and entitled. YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO A LEVEL OF PAY THAT YOU DON'T WORK FOR or to wage that does not make it worthwhile for your employers to hire you at THAT LEVEL.
LoL...Personally I don't think any of them have clean hands. The only thing I disagree with is Bernie's policies. I think his policies need to be better elaborated on and changed in multiple regards. I think he says things he knows won't and cannot be done but is saying them because it might get him elected. I think his policies are bad for the economy and undo what Obama has done. I wouldn't vote for either but if you held a gun to my head I'd pick Hillary off the strength she has slightly better economic plan and is a woman (yeah a said it). Bernie's hands aren't clean and he doesn't give a ? about ? either. Bernie voted against Assata Shakur and her entire movement overwhelmingly on two occasions and gave no answer for it.
As for anti deregulation, in regards to the banks there isn't much more that needs to be done that the Dodd Frank act of 09 doesn't cover (which tightly regulates banks and certain economic provisions). He's saying the economy is in the toilet when unemployment is at record lows and the economy is growing. Taxes will be raised on them and they'll be less profitable in the long run but you'll never stop Wall Street. They are a necessary evil just as taxes are.
As for Hillary I'm going to have to look deeper into that for real.
Dude, I think you're missing context. He's a stepping stone. He has said time and time again that he cannot implement said changes. That things might not change at all while he's in office. He hasn't been coy or deceitful. He's asking people to rise up. If you (not you) feel a certain way, you'll do that: if not, you won't. That means the average person needs to get informed and get involved.
Social mobility is stagnant or trending downwards for the middle and working class. Globalization and deregulation have been disastrous for the average American. Austerity measures have literally been killing the poor; E.g., Flint. And since the recession 91% of all new and untaxed income has gone to the top 1% of our population (http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/apr/19/bernie-s/bernie-sanders-says-99-percent-new-income-going-to/).
(This is of course eschewing reallocation, it's more like 40% while the bottom 50% of America holds 11%.)
Cost of living has risen 67% since 1990 and wages have not kept up. The minimum wage has only risen 21%. Our major employers are Wal Mart (1) Yum Foods (2) McDonalds (3). These are largely minimum wage jobs. How is the average citizen supposed to live? How are people supposed to catch up? I won't even get into the rising cost of education.
Laissez faire capitalism and the pipe dream of rugged individualism has turned our social safety net into a bizzarro world cottage industry for the super rich. They can make record profits while ? their employees and we foot the bill.
The utter myopia of it all is staggering.
It is now accepted as fact that our politicians are bought and sold. Things are ? up here.
This is about having a politician who represents the will of the people not big money, and creating a domino effect. We need a complete paradigm shift and I don't care how many rich people get hurt in the process. ? em.
Sounds like you calling for a purge -
we have not had laissex faire capitalism. in america what we have had is crony capitalism
-
-
She said nothing for me to be offended by tho. She stating her opinion. I respect Kai and she showing up most of the men in here.
We grown and I welcome healthy debate.
YO, man how many more generations are going to debate on the same topics???? THE SOCIALIST thing does not work any form of it is doomed to long term failure. Traditional SOCIALISM, national SOCIALISM, democratic SOCIALISM any form of SOCIALISM will end in failure.
Yeah I agree. I keep saying I'm gonna stop with these threads but every time I get out they pull me back in LOLOL.
Europe is learning this the hard way unfortunately. I think there are elements of socialism that can work in a capitalist society tho. But full blown socialism IMO doesn't work. There will always be a person who doesn't want to "share" and will want more of the pie. There will always be people who will want more than average.
Agreed.
Fortunately the fact the US technically has a mixed economy and doesn't have a true free market system (full blown pure capitalism) means we can actually interject socialist policies without it causing hazardous fiscal policy challenges.
I agree wholeheartedly.A RECESSION IS COMING You YOUNG BERNIE SANDERS SUPPORTERS HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!!!!!!!! IF you get what you want and elect bernie sanders and he gets what he wants WE ARE ALL GOING TO SUFFER. Because employers are not going to hire anybody especially a young person if they have to PAY THAT PERSON FOR 12 WEEKS VACATION.
? OUT OF HERE i can't believe this whole generation is so ? lazy and entitled. YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO A LEVEL OF PAY THAT YOU DON'T WORK FOR or to wage that does not make it worthwhile for your employers to hire you at THAT LEVEL.
LoL...Personally I don't think any of them have clean hands. The only thing I disagree with is Bernie's policies. I think his policies need to be better elaborated on and changed in multiple regards. I think he says things he knows won't and cannot be done but is saying them because it might get him elected. I think his policies are bad for the economy and undo what Obama has done. I wouldn't vote for either but if you held a gun to my head I'd pick Hillary off the strength she has slightly better economic plan and is a woman (yeah a said it). Bernie's hands aren't clean and he doesn't give a ? about ? either. Bernie voted against Assata Shakur and her entire movement overwhelmingly on two occasions and gave no answer for it.
As for anti deregulation, in regards to the banks there isn't much more that needs to be done that the Dodd Frank act of 09 doesn't cover (which tightly regulates banks and certain economic provisions). He's saying the economy is in the toilet when unemployment is at record lows and the economy is growing. Taxes will be raised on them and they'll be less profitable in the long run but you'll never stop Wall Street. They are a necessary evil just as taxes are.
As for Hillary I'm going to have to look deeper into that for real.
Dude, I think you're missing context. He's a stepping stone. He has said time and time again that he cannot implement said changes. That things might not change at all while he's in office. He hasn't been coy or deceitful. He's asking people to rise up. If you (not you) feel a certain way, you'll do that: if not, you won't. That means the average person needs to get informed and get involved.
Social mobility is stagnant or trending downwards for the middle and working class. Globalization and deregulation have been disastrous for the average American. Austerity measures have literally been killing the poor; E.g., Flint. And since the recession 91% of all new and untaxed income has gone to the top 1% of our population (http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/apr/19/bernie-s/bernie-sanders-says-99-percent-new-income-going-to/).
(This is of course eschewing reallocation, it's more like 40% while the bottom 50% of America holds 11%.)
Cost of living has risen 67% since 1990 and wages have not kept up. The minimum wage has only risen 21%. Our major employers are Wal Mart (1) Yum Foods (2) McDonalds (3). These are largely minimum wage jobs. How is the average citizen supposed to live? How are people supposed to catch up? I won't even get into the rising cost of education.
Laissez faire capitalism and the pipe dream of rugged individualism has turned our social safety net into a bizzarro world cottage industry for the super rich. They can make record profits while ? their employees and we foot the bill.
The utter myopia of it all is staggering.
It is now accepted as fact that our politicians are bought and sold. Things are ? up here.
This is about having a politician who represents the will of the people not big money, and creating a domino effect. We need a complete paradigm shift and I don't care how many rich people get hurt in the process. ? em.
I'm currently still in the process of thoroughly evaluating all the politicians but each day I'm inching closer to finishing up the process of finally deciding which candidate I'll support.
Admittedly, the fact that Sanders has been outspoken about austerity policies- whereas Hillary (along with any Republican candidate that has legitimate shot at winning the nomination) has shown she has no qualms with imposing austerity measures - one of many important factors I've noted in my comparative analysis between the two. -
America hasn't had laissez faire capitalism since late 19th early 20th century.
-
As an Arkansas native, Ive sat & watched Hillary Clinton be full of ? since slick ? had black hair. ? that fake ass ? .
-
Spoiler Alert: Laissez Faire capitalism doesn't exist: it never has and never will. The invisible hand of the free market and the free market in and of itself is idealist nonsense.
Crony capitalism is a direct result of laissez faire capitalism; E.g., deregulation and globalization. Crony capitalism is an inevitable outcome when capitalism is left unfettered. Everything is for sale (including politicians) because "things will take their course."
But they wont take their course.
We are not on an even playing field as evidenced by our current state of being, and profits are not an effective measure of social well being when they are obtained by creating unemployment and declining living standards in one's home country (as well as the countries they exploit). But, you know things will just take their course. They will trickle down right?
They haven't and they wont!
Adhering to the idea that a pure and unhindered form of capitalism or socialism is best - is stupid. It's 2016, how about some eclecticism?
The government is a tool we can use to reign in all that ? if we can muster the ? to start holding those who are culpable - responsible. But people are too complacent or too scared to lose their place at the kids table to do ? . Which is why there is so much opposition to democratic socialism.
-
Spoiler Alert: Laissez Faire capitalism doesn't exist: it never has and never will. The invisible hand of the free market and the free market in and of itself is idealist nonsense.
Crony capitalism is a direct result of laissez faire capitalism; E.g., deregulation and globalization. Crony capitalism is an inevitable outcome when capitalism is left unfettered. Everything is for sale (including politicians) because "things will take their course."
But they wont take their course.
We are not on an even playing field as evidenced by our current state of being, and profits are not an effective measure of social well being when they are obtained by creating unemployment and declining living standards in one's home country (as well as the countries they exploit). But, you know things will just take their course. They will trickle down right?
They haven't and they wont!
Adhering to the idea that a pure and unhindered form of capitalism or socialism is best - is stupid. It's 2016, how about some eclecticism?
The government is a tool we can use to reign in all that ? if we can muster the ? to start holding those who are culpable - responsible. But people are too complacent or too scared to lose their place at the kids table to do ? . Which is why there is so much opposition to democratic socialism.
Contradiction much. But laissez faire was prominent in the industrial age until FDE took a stand against Monopolies. I agree with your point though a pure capitalism or socialism/communism system is horrible in itself.
Thought the ideas of Democratic socialism that capitalism is overall incapable of valuing freedom is foolish. -
sion i'm a lil surprised by your stance on bernie sanders since he'd be a typical liberal in canada. why don't the americans deserve a real liberal for a damn change instead of all these damn republican-lite democrats? and where does this idea that bernie has done less for minorities than hillary has? bernie is probably the only pol in the longest time besides maybe dennis kucinich that has been saying the same thing from day one, stick to his principals and actually stood for something. when bernie was getting arrested in civil rights marchs, hillary was working for barry ? goldwater. you can say that you expect more from him or that he should've done more, but i venture to say hillary has not only done less, but has actively sought to harm blacks
she's also the same person that was pushing her husbands mass incarceration programs by labelling black kids as "super predators." hillary is a shill of corporations, she's proven and shown that her votes can be bought seeing as she was anti-de regulation in the beginning but all of a sudden changed her mind once she started getting all these speaking gigs and donations from the likes of goldman sachs
just a case in point on how both candidates interact with each group
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VbHUI1R3IA
at around the 7 min mark you can watch bernie's response to the protestors
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqLfvQfuvsA
this is hillary being interrupted by a woman asking her about the super predator comments and look how rude and condescending she is to her. also notice she not only doesn't apologize, she gives absolutely no explanation.
imo black people, especially older blacks just don't know about bernie and his policies as well as not knowing about all the trully ? up ? hillary has done, more so than it is they simply just like hillary more
@kai the only person who can make me even consider Islam with her rational thinking and intuitive and logistic and show great empathy and power emotion in a written response.
We need you to be the voice of reason here. -
But how does any of this help African people globally?
-
looks like the 2 black females wanted to jump him
-
Sanders teeth lost
-
-
Elzo69Renaissance wrote: »
To be fair, she said she's always tried to tell the truth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd3UMU85od0
^^^I just don't understand how people can't see through her, she's so full of ? just like her supporters
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BKNZF5sCGQ
Notice how this Hillary supporter deflects the issue of Hillary being paid by special interest and asks to take her word at face value. Pathetic, hillary supporters are just as ignorant as Trump supporters at this point. Btw basic common sense tells you not to elect a candidate with as much baggage and scandal's as Hillary Clinton, Bernie has been avoiding her scandals but any Republican will point to them and her low favorability/honesting polling. She is in this thing for her self, there's no legitmate reason for her to want to be in the whitehouse except to make power moves to become even more rich and secure her family dynasty. Hillary Clinton is the next Richard Nixon, I don't trust her for ? especially with the power of being POTUS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4DxXHh-p-O4
https://youtu.be/-dY77j6uBHI