25 Yr Old PHilly Rapper PNB Rock gets 15yr Old Girl Pregnant (3 IC posters Exposed As Pedos On Pg.6)
Options
Comments
-
CashmoneyDux wrote: »konceptjones wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »Busta Carmichael wrote: »3 down.
Blackrain ain't playing no games lmaoo
The crazy ? is...some folks have actually tried to argue for to be allowed to talk about this ? free of consequences before and said banning people for it is abuse mod powers
since yall on the high horse, might as well delete that "teach smash student" thread
Nah, we need that as standing proof that these chicks out here are slimy pedophiles too.
Well ban the ? who would dap their sons up if they got ? by a teacher
We need to stop this pc ? by pretending that's the same thing.
Now, in the eyes of the law........it should be considered the same.
However, let's not act like a 16yr old boy ? a grown female teacher is as bad as a grown male teacher ? a 16yr old girl.
That's that feminist, gender equality ? .........and we're not the same.
With the 16yr old boy.......I wouldn't consider him a victim because he's not being penetrated.
He's doing the penetrating.
nh
Whereas with the 16yr old girl, it's easier to see her as a victim because she is the one being penetrated.
Basically, the average 16yr old boy is gonna be stronger than a grown woman.
So it's hard to believe a female teacher would be able to force him into having sex with her against his will.
The same can't be said for a 16yr old girl and a grown man.
Again, both of them should be prosecuted the same under the law........but the scenario with the 16yr old girl and a male teacher is worse than a scenario with a 16yr old boy and a female teacher.
Nah brah. It's both ways.
No mental differences between men and women
If you cool with 16 yr old boy consenting then be cool with the 16 yr old girl
It's consensual sex. If one is unacceptable the other is too. -
18 is still too young
If you 17 on Monday and turn 18 on Wednesday ? you still a kid...you aint grow up overnight ?
We call those ? predators...eyeballing children
Real Talk. That's why I'm particularly salty about that age of consent ? ? in here pulling.
Age of consent was created mostly for sex between peers. For ? like seniors dating freshmen in high school.
Not for ? in they third year of college or for old washed up pimps or lames who can't find women their own age.
That ? has become a loophole for ? ? .
-
CashmoneyDux wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »konceptjones wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »Busta Carmichael wrote: »3 down.
Blackrain ain't playing no games lmaoo
The crazy ? is...some folks have actually tried to argue for to be allowed to talk about this ? free of consequences before and said banning people for it is abuse mod powers
since yall on the high horse, might as well delete that "teach smash student" thread
Nah, we need that as standing proof that these chicks out here are slimy pedophiles too.
Well ban the ? who would dap their sons up if they got ? by a teacher
We need to stop this pc ? by pretending that's the same thing.
Now, in the eyes of the law........it should be considered the same.
However, let's not act like a 16yr old boy ? a grown female teacher is as bad as a grown male teacher ? a 16yr old girl.
That's that feminist, gender equality ? .........and we're not the same.
With the 16yr old boy.......I wouldn't consider him a victim because he's not being penetrated.
He's doing the penetrating.
nh
Whereas with the 16yr old girl, it's easier to see her as a victim because she is the one being penetrated.
Basically, the average 16yr old boy is gonna be stronger than a grown woman.
So it's hard to believe a female teacher would be able to force him into having sex with her against his will.
The same can't be said for a 16yr old girl and a grown man.
Again, both of them should be prosecuted the same under the law........but the scenario with the 16yr old girl and a male teacher is worse than a scenario with a 16yr old boy and a female teacher.
So you saying men can't get ? by women?
Legally, yes.....in terms of statutory and age of consent laws.
However, they can't be ? in the truest sense of the word unless they've been forcibly penetrated against their will.
nh
So, unless a female forcibly penetrates a man against his will.......an actual ? did not take place.
nh again. -
@deadeye have a seat breh. Whether you penetrating or not that doesn't mean you have control or a say.
No kid should be used as a sex toy for an adult period.
The scenario I used was a 16yr old boy and a grown woman.
For me to consider him a "kid," he would have to be physically weaker than the woman.
Remember, ? isn't about sex right........it's about power and control.
Call me sexist or whatever, but I just can't process a grown woman being able to overpower and impose her will on a 16yr old boy.
Meaning, he's not gonna do anything he doesn't wanna do.
You'd have a point if you were talking about someone much younger........but not a 16yr old adolescent male. -
CashmoneyDux wrote: »konceptjones wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »Busta Carmichael wrote: »3 down.
Blackrain ain't playing no games lmaoo
The crazy ? is...some folks have actually tried to argue for to be allowed to talk about this ? free of consequences before and said banning people for it is abuse mod powers
since yall on the high horse, might as well delete that "teach smash student" thread
Nah, we need that as standing proof that these chicks out here are slimy pedophiles too.
Well ban the ? who would dap their sons up if they got ? by a teacher
We need to stop this pc ? by pretending that's the same thing.
Now, in the eyes of the law........it should be considered the same.
However, let's not act like a 16yr old boy ? a grown female teacher is as bad as a grown male teacher ? a 16yr old girl.
That's that feminist, gender equality ? .........and we're not the same.
With the 16yr old boy.......I wouldn't consider him a victim because he's not being penetrated.
He's doing the penetrating.
nh
Whereas with the 16yr old girl, it's easier to see her as a victim because she is the one being penetrated.
Basically, the average 16yr old boy is gonna be stronger than a grown woman.
So it's hard to believe a female teacher would be able to force him into having sex with her against his will.
The same can't be said for a 16yr old girl and a grown man.
Again, both of them should be prosecuted the same under the law........but the scenario with the 16yr old girl and a male teacher is worse than a scenario with a 16yr old boy and a female teacher.
Nah brah. It's both ways.
No mental differences between men and women
If you cool with 16 yr old boy consenting then be cool with the 16 yr old girl
It's consensual sex. If one is unacceptable the other is too.
I was referring to the obvious physical differences.
So, it's not the same thing........at least not in my eyes.
Stop buying into that gender equality rhetoric. -
18 is still too young
If you 17 on Monday and turn 18 on Wednesday ? you still a kid...you aint grow up overnight ?
We call those ? predators...eyeballing children
Real Talk. That's why I'm particularly salty about that age of consent ? ? in here pulling.
Age of consent was created mostly for sex between peers. For ? like seniors dating freshmen in high school.
Not for ? in they third year of college or for old washed up pimps or lames who can't find women their own age.
That ? has become a loophole for ? ? .
Basically. ? think that it's cool 'cause she legal but still lookin like Chesters outchea. -
2stepz_ahead wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »konceptjones wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »Busta Carmichael wrote: »3 down.
Blackrain ain't playing no games lmaoo
The crazy ? is...some folks have actually tried to argue for to be allowed to talk about this ? free of consequences before and said banning people for it is abuse mod powers
since yall on the high horse, might as well delete that "teach smash student" thread
Nah, we need that as standing proof that these chicks out here are slimy pedophiles too.
Well ban the ? who would dap their sons up if they got ? by a teacher
We need to stop this pc ? by pretending that's the same thing.
Now, in the eyes of the law........it should be considered the same.
However, let's not act like a 16yr old boy ? a grown female teacher is as bad as a grown male teacher ? a 16yr old girl.
That's that feminist, gender equality ? .........and we're not the same.
With the 16yr old boy.......I wouldn't consider him a victim because he's not being penetrated.
He's doing the penetrating.
nh
Whereas with the 16yr old girl, it's easier to see her as a victim because she is the one being penetrated.
Basically, the average 16yr old boy is gonna be stronger than a grown woman.
So it's hard to believe a female teacher would be able to force him into having sex with her against his will.
The same can't be said for a 16yr old girl and a grown man.
Again, both of them should be prosecuted the same under the law........but the scenario with the 16yr old girl and a male teacher is worse than a scenario with a 16yr old boy and a female teacher.
a female lion killing a deer is the same as a male lion killing a deer.
you looking funny in the light ? .
and ? who and women who are ok with the 50 shades should be banned...
it promotes females preying on men to have them turn into sick well.......chicks dont care as long as they benefit i suppose...but its crazy how that part is skipped over.
Human beings aren't lions though.
However, if you're talking about murder.........you'd be correct.
But we're not talking about murder.........we're talking about sex.
? to be more specific.
And again, unless someone is being forcibly penetrated against their will........they're not actually being "? " in the truest sense of the word.
So, your scenario would only be true if each party was being forcibly penetrated.
The person who's doing the penetrating cannot be a ? victim.
This really shouldn't be that hard of a concept to grasp.
A 16yr old adolescent male whose penetrating a grown woman is not a ? victim.
Can't say the same for a 16yr old girl being penetrated by a grown man. -
And again, unless someone is being forcibly penetrated against their will........they're not actually being "? " in the truest sense of the word.
So, your scenario would only be true if each party was being forcibly penetrated.
The person who's doing the penetrating cannot be a ? victim.
This really shouldn't be that hard of a concept to grasp.
A 16yr old adolescent male whose penetrating a grown woman is not a ? victim.
Can't say the same for a 16yr old girl being penetrated by a grown man.
I mostly agree with everything you've said. And I'm glad we can forgo political correctness and be honest for once, but I think (that is, if I understand you correctly) that I disagree with your idea that "[a] 16yr old adolescent male whose penetrating a grown woman is not a ? victim."
I think we can agree that in your example, the grown woman is guilty of statutory ? , regardless of how you feel about the "validity" of statutory ? . OK.
But beyond that, do you not think that the 16-year-old boy can be a victim in a "emotional" or psychological sense (or some other sense), even if you don't think that he can be a victim in a physical sense (which is itself debatable, imo)?
We know that one's childhood can be immensely fragile and influential and thus prone to harm, regardless of the child's age, gender, or physicality, right? And we know that adults, let alone grown women, can be manipulative, abusive, and exploitative, right?
I'm the last person to coddle "young adults," but young adults are still very much in the early stages of life and really don't know ? . They're impressionable (even if though they deny it) and thus can easily be victimized. I honestly don't consider anyone under 25-30 to be a grown adult. -
There was two Russian Butch broads that drugged some dude, kidnapped him, tied him up and injected Viagra in him.
The used his as their personal slave for two weeks with no food I think.
You don't count that as ? @deadeye -
Busta Carmichael wrote: »There was two Russian Butch broads that drugged some dude, kidnapped him, tied him up and injected Viagra in him.
The used his as their personal slave for two weeks with no food I think.
You don't count that as ? @deadeye
Exceptions and norms...........exceptions and norms.
That's an extreme situation, so......despite the fact that he wasn't penetrated........nh........he was ? because he was forced to have sex against his will.
Most encounters aren't going to be that extreme though. -
And again, unless someone is being forcibly penetrated against their will........they're not actually being "? " in the truest sense of the word.
So, your scenario would only be true if each party was being forcibly penetrated.
The person who's doing the penetrating cannot be a ? victim.
This really shouldn't be that hard of a concept to grasp.
A 16yr old adolescent male whose penetrating a grown woman is not a ? victim.
Can't say the same for a 16yr old girl being penetrated by a grown man.
I mostly agree with everything you've said. And I'm glad we can forgo political correctness and be honest for once, but I think (that is, if I understand you correctly) that I disagree with your idea that "[a] 16yr old adolescent male whose penetrating a grown woman is not a ? victim."
I think we can agree that in your example, the grown woman is guilty of statutory ? , regardless of how you feel about the "validity" of statutory ? . OK.
But beyond that, do you not think that the 16-year-old boy can be a victim in a "emotional" or psychological sense (or some other sense), even if you don't think that he can be a victim in a physical sense (which is itself debatable, imo)?
We know that one's childhood can be immensely fragile and influential and thus prone to harm, regardless of the child's age, gender, or physicality, right? And we know that adults, let alone grown women, can be manipulative, abusive, and exploitative, right?
I'm the last person to coddle "young adults," but young adults are still very much in the early stages of life and really don't know ? . They're impressionable (even if though they deny it) and thus can easily be victimized. I honestly don't consider anyone under 25-30 to be a grown adult.
I can accept that.
I wasn't really condoning either situation.........just saying that people need to stop acting like they're the same thing. -
CashmoneyDux wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »konceptjones wrote: »CashmoneyDux wrote: »Busta Carmichael wrote: »3 down.
Blackrain ain't playing no games lmaoo
The crazy ? is...some folks have actually tried to argue for to be allowed to talk about this ? free of consequences before and said banning people for it is abuse mod powers
since yall on the high horse, might as well delete that "teach smash student" thread
Nah, we need that as standing proof that these chicks out here are slimy pedophiles too.
Well ban the ? who would dap their sons up if they got ? by a teacher
We need to stop this pc ? by pretending that's the same thing.
Now, in the eyes of the law........it should be considered the same.
However, let's not act like a 16yr old boy ? a grown female teacher is as bad as a grown male teacher ? a 16yr old girl.
That's that feminist, gender equality ? .........and we're not the same.
With the 16yr old boy.......I wouldn't consider him a victim because he's not being penetrated.
He's doing the penetrating.
nh
Whereas with the 16yr old girl, it's easier to see her as a victim because she is the one being penetrated.
Basically, the average 16yr old boy is gonna be stronger than a grown woman.
So it's hard to believe a female teacher would be able to force him into having sex with her against his will.
The same can't be said for a 16yr old girl and a grown man.
Again, both of them should be prosecuted the same under the law........but the scenario with the 16yr old girl and a male teacher is worse than a scenario with a 16yr old boy and a female teacher.
So you saying men can't get ? by women?
Legally, yes.....in terms of statutory and age of consent laws.
However, they can't be ? in the truest sense of the word unless they've been forcibly penetrated against their will.
nh
So, unless a female forcibly penetrates a man against his will.......an actual ? did not take place.
nh again.
so toying with the mind of an adolescent is different when it comes to gender?
so young man with no control over their body cant be held down and straddled by a grown woman?
strike 2.
swing
batta
batta
batta
swing -
Nah that ? is still wrong as ? and just as damaging for grown women to be preying on teenage boys. ? keep trying push that "well he's a boy so its different"...Nah you still have someome with the mentality of a child being taken advantage of by an adult
-
Nah that ? is still wrong as ? and just as damaging for grown women to be preying on teenage boys. ? keep trying push that "well he's a boy so its different"...Nah you still have someome with the mentality of a child being taken advantage of by an adult
Perhaps I'm not understanding you correctly, but it is different when it's a boy. It's very simple: boy =/= girl. How is that not obvious? This difference can be very important and thus shouldn't be ignored or glossed over, imo.
Regardless, that fact doesn't change much of anything else you've said. The two aren't mutually exclusive. The fact that difference in sex (that is, "sex" in both senses) has an effect in the sexual assault of teenagers by adults does not change the fact that adult sexual predators can victimize both boys and girls. It doesn't seem like anybody is disputing the latter fact. -
-
i got an idea.
how about yall show a female family member this post
then ask them if they like 50 shades of grey..
then see their reaction.
womenz prey too and not just in church -
Nah that ? is still wrong as ? and just as damaging for grown women to be preying on teenage boys. ? keep trying push that "well he's a boy so its different"...Nah you still have someome with the mentality of a child being taken advantage of by an adult
Perhaps I'm not understanding you correctly, but it is different when it's a boy. It's very simple: boy =/= girl. How is that not obvious? This difference can be very important and thus shouldn't be ignored or glossed over, imo.
Regardless, that fact doesn't change much of anything else you've said. The two aren't mutually exclusive. The fact that difference in sex (that is, "sex" in both senses) has an effect in the sexual assault of teenagers by adults does not change the fact that adult sexual predators can victimize both boys and girls. It doesn't seem like anybody is disputing the latter fact.
You're dealing with a mind thats not fully developed and neither is their opinion or views on sex, the opposite sex or relationships in general. Thr potential for harm is no different. I'm not glossing over it I'm saying this idea that somehow a grown woman sleeping with a teenager is less damaging that the reverse happening is stupid -
Yall really go argue with creepy ass deadeye.
He probably got a few girl scouts tied up in his basement -
Yall really go argue with creepy ass deadeye.
He probably got a few girl scouts tied up in his basement
? like one more Wal Mart visit from catching a stalking charge.
-
Yall really go argue with creepy ass deadeye.
He probably got a few girl scouts tied up in his basement
big ole girls scouts.
he like em big -
man, another possible candidate to get banned...just check the ADHD thread
-
-
im still surprised we aint checking all the wording in here.
im not a snitch but...
just saying -
busta props for the mention yo but i wish i never read this ?
? ? make me sick. I bet Joker is reading this thread all like
-
This discussion has been closed.