Rewriting Evolution ~ Darwin was wrong
Options
Comments
-
Ajackson17 wrote: »I have addressed it and yet no one responded to me. The core factor in evolution is real and those who do not believe it, well I blame their education for it.
You addressed it with your personal beliefs/feelings............
This was intended to be an academic/scientific debate......
Leave your feelings at the door.......
Feelings? I gave you a logical answer, but since you will noy look ay the factual information than I'm leaving this topic. -
60 years from now
People are going to laugh at how people used to believe in creationism -
Ajackson17 wrote: »After reading, I do still believe in the theory of evolution, but how we are going about it is probably very incorrect, but we now knowing that we need to change direction. Like @kai_vayla said its like a very complicated web.
And why humans because we are not in hazardous conditions to the point we have to gain certain features for us to survive and become better than we are. We may started evolving but not to anything like a predator perhaps in a way that we wouldn't realize.
This is what you said.......
& yes it is a "web" as described in my posts......
A web that ultimately disproves Darwin's Tree of Life/common descent.........
& his theory as well..........
-
-
60 years from now
People are going to laugh at how people used to believe in creationism
Kind of like how we laugh at how people believed in evolutionary vestigial remnants in humans......
tailbones.....
pineal gland.......
appendix.......
Body hair........
wisdom teeth.......
Junk DNA.........
Tree of Life........
The list of Darwinist horseshit gets bigger each day...................
-
60 years from now
People are going to laugh at how people used to believe in creationism
Kind of like how we laugh at how people believed in evolutionary vestigial remnants in humans......
tailbones.....
pineal gland.......
appendix.......
wisdom teeth.......
The list of Darwinist horseshit gets bigger each day...................
You forgot prostate too..
You won't win because you know why?
Humans are still monkeys and birds are still dinosaurs
And you forgot the body hair, nipples and erector pili -
60 years from now
People are going to laugh at how people used to believe in creationism
Kind of like how we laugh at how people believed in evolutionary vestigial remnants in humans......
tailbones.....
pineal gland.......
appendix.......
wisdom teeth.......
The list of Darwinist horseshit gets bigger each day...................
You forgot prostate too..
You won't win because you know why?
Humans are still monkeys and birds are still dinosaurs
And you forgot the body hair, nipples and erector pili
Edit........
Thanks.....
I already won.......
-
Can you explain Snakes having pelvises?
Um, flightless birds and etc?
Clearly ? wasn't an idiot -
Can you explain Snakes having pelvises?
Um, flightless birds and etc?
Clearly ? wasn't an idiot
You already witnessed the debunking of flightless birds and reptiles........
I will deconstruct them again here.......
But be specific..........
About the ALL's mental capacity........
Trust in the Lord with all your heart
and lean not on your own understanding........Proverbs 3 5
Loose translation " It is none of @ohhhla's business.......
-
So, basically we created even tho there's no evidence?
Yea, no. You're wrong.
You haven't won a nobel peace prize or had your ? peer-reviewed.
-
Don't go back and forth with Bambu aka Bambi.
Dude is stupid. -
You haven't won a nobel peace prize or had your ? peer-reviewed.
@ohhhla....
You dont know me ? .......
And every reference that I posted has been peer reviewed..........
Quit trolling ? .......
Or debate with evidence.................
-
Anyone who acts like physical evolution occurs instantly, right before your eyes...u
You need to turn pokemon off because it has totally skewed your idea of the word...
To any so called cristians:
Why are there so many different religeous practices?..if theres only one ? , why so many different religeons? And what makes YOURS the correct one? It wasnt here first... -
Don't go back and forth with Bambu aka Bambi.
Dude is stupid.
Well get the ? out of my thread ? ......
You don't have to contend with me @vibe.......
Your silence surrounding the evidence illustrates your true feelings and your ignorance..... -
Why doesn't majority of Scientists accept this claim???? -
Because the have been trained by ignorant Darwinists......
-
Why hasn't Evolution failed any test?
Why is it is so applicable for most things in Science?
There are people who have debunk your claims
And there is the fossil record. -
So you disagree with the definition of "speciation"?Gold_Certificate wrote: »
But you're only arguing against theories that attempt to explain how/why biological evolution occurs.Gold_Certificate wrote: »
I see. I thought you were trying to "debunk" biological evolution.Gold_Certificate wrote: »
I see.Gold_Certificate wrote: »So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......
And the engine of scientific racism................
I believe that this is a G&S topic........
But will move to the R&R in a few days.............
I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......
So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?
In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=42382&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo
The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........
Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html
I am.....
You know what's going on here..............
You're not arguing that biological evolution does not occur, right?
This is where we get into semantics............
Biological evolution as it describes change over time exists and cannot be debunked........
However......
Biological evolution as describing how one species can evolve into many is horseshit.........
And will be debunked in this thread......... -
He thinks because we've never witness something drastic
It doesn't exist -
Because the have been trained by ignorant Darwinists......
you use the term darwinists in an attempt to make evolution seem like some sort of religion, it's not. you also fallaciously seem to think that like religion, discrediting the author discredits the ideas. science doesn't work like that, darwin could be wrong, doesn't make the facts of evolution wrong.
I made none of these statements...............
What facts???????? -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »
So you disagree with the definition of "speciation"?Gold_Certificate wrote: »
But you're only arguing against theories that attempt to explain how/why biological evolution occurs.Gold_Certificate wrote: »
I see. I thought you were trying to "debunk" biological evolution.Gold_Certificate wrote: »
I see.Gold_Certificate wrote: »So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......
And the engine of scientific racism................
I believe that this is a G&S topic........
But will move to the R&R in a few days.............
I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......
So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?
In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=42382&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo
The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........
Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html
I am.....
You know what's going on here..............
You're not arguing that biological evolution does not occur, right?
This is where we get into semantics............
Biological evolution as it describes change over time exists and cannot be debunked........
However......
Biological evolution as describing how one species can evolve into many is horseshit.........
And will be debunked in this thread.........
Yes.....
-
-
Do you don't accept humans are primates?
When tho they possess all of traits of a primate??
How dishonest is that? -
Gold_Certificate wrote: »
So you disagree with the definition of "speciation"?Gold_Certificate wrote: »
But you're only arguing against theories that attempt to explain how/why biological evolution occurs.Gold_Certificate wrote: »
I see. I thought you were trying to "debunk" biological evolution.Gold_Certificate wrote: »
I see.Gold_Certificate wrote: »So how does this involve the article in the first post of this thread?This thread was established for the sole purpose of "debunking" or "proving" that the theory of evolution is bogus......
And the engine of scientific racism................
I believe that this is a G&S topic........
But will move to the R&R in a few days.............
I will be compiling evidence here that sheds doubt on evolution and Darwinism......
So you are arguing against specific theories of how biological evolution rather than arguing against the fact the biological evolution occurs?
In the first instance, I am arguing that new research has shown that previous evolutionary theories were incorrect and have to be rewritten.......
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=42382&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=pulsenews#.USlPyWdnCSo
The second illustrates that the "Tree of Life" accepted by many scientists.........
Has now been shown to be an "antiquated" system of describing life-systems.......
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html
I am.....
You know what's going on here..............
You're not arguing that biological evolution does not occur, right?
This is where we get into semantics............
Biological evolution as it describes change over time exists and cannot be debunked........
However......
Biological evolution as describing how one species can evolve into many is horseshit.........
And will be debunked in this thread.........
no, he seems to believe speciation does not occur at all, apparently because e.coli hasn't evolved into new species since we've been observing it (that's what he said)
Eureka.......
I was quite serious.......
What facts???????
If Darwin was wrong......
Some of the "facts of evolution" are also wrong.....
"The tree-of-life concept was absolutely central to Darwin's thinking, equal in importance to natural to natural selection, according to biologist W. Ford Doolittle of Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Without it the theory of evolution would never have happened. The tree also helped carry the day for evolution. Darwin argued successfully that the tree of life was a fact of nature, plain for all to see though in need of explanation. The explanation he came up with was evolution by natural selection"
-
So, how were we created???
Even if you did disprove Evolution, doesn't mean we were created.
http://youtu.be/cjlXDRT18QA
