Romo>>>>>>>>Vick
Options
Comments
-
Vick has been around twice as long as Romo and has only won one more playoff game.
As a matter of fact, Romo has better postseason statistics across the board. Better completion percentage, yards and Passer Rating. Despite playing 4 postseason game's to Vick's 6, he's thrown 1 fewer TD and half as many picks.
You can pick whoever you want to pick. But if anyone acts like Vick is in another class than Romo, you're a ? . Up until last year, he was a ? QB who was a great runner. -
Neither....
-
Romo does indeed have better passer statistics than Vick.
-
vicks a better athlete...thats about it
worse statistics
worse win percentage
1 more playoff win.
still waiting for somebody to make a valid case for vick.. -
millz_flybridge wrote: »yes .
One<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<more -
In Atlanta, he was completing less than 54% of his passes, averaging .97 TDs to .7 INTs per game, and 135 yards passing per game.
Throughout his career in Atlanta, Vick was averaging 15 TDs to 11 INTs in a season. rofl @ this dude only throwing 20 TDs once in ATL despite 4 seasons playing atleast 15 games. -
Romo is better than Vick.
Romo has 11 4th quarter comebacks, and 12 game winning drives in 68 drives
Vick has 10 4th quarter comebacks, and 11 game winning drives in I think 86 starts
But it's cool. ? won't let ? like comebacks and game winning drives trick them into thinkin sum1's clutch. -
People are caught up in the Mirage of Vick and his big play ability . He is a problem for defenses yes because of his ? given talent . But as a whole he is just average . Romo is a better QB , but as a fan of Dallas he aint great either . He has to win when it counts and stop making ? decisions in critical moments .
-
PanchoYoSancho wrote: »In Atlanta, he was completing less than 54% of his passes, averaging .97 TDs to .7 INTs per game, and 135 yards passing per game.
Throughout his career in Atlanta, Vick was averaging 15 TDs to 11 INTs in a season. rofl @ this dude only throwing 20 TDs once in ATL despite 4 seasons playing atleast 15 games.
Of course lames ignore the rushing yards and tds, clearly bias. ? up you ? messican. -
Carlos Loozer wrote: »Of course lames ignore the rushing yards and tds, clearly bias. ? up you ? messican.
Eat a ? , ? . He was still a ? QB. -
PanchoYoSancho wrote: »Eat a ? , ? . He was still a ? QB.
You're mad paco? Should be happy you're even in this country you ? messican. Don't post misleading stats ? . -
Mark Sanchez has more playoff wins and more conference title game appearences, so he's better than vick
-
bow to royalty wrote: »Romo is better than Vick.
Romo has 11 4th quarter comebacks, and 12 game winning drives in 68 drives
Vick has 10 4th quarter comebacks, and 11 game winning drives in I think 86 starts
But it's cool. ? won't let ? like comebacks and game winning drives trick them into thinkin sum1's clutch. -
Carlos Loozer wrote: »You're mad paco? Should be happy you're even in this country you ? messican. Don't post misleading stats ? .
You can add all his rushing yards and rushing TDs to his passing stats, and he still isnt ? . The definition of feast or famine. A poor man's QB version of Barry Sanders.
And I was born in this country, ? sucker. -
he's a dallas fan of course he's gonna actually gonna "believe" that romo is better than vick
-
PanchoYoSancho wrote: »You can add all his rushing yards and rushing TDs to his passing stats, and he still isnt ? . .
Im done with you javier nh -
In what way is vick better than romo, besides running ability?
-
In what way is vick better than romo, besides running ability?
No way at all.
I could be wrong, but someone show me the stats for Vick in close late fourth quarter games. He's had a few comebacks, but so has Romo.
Romo really been ? me off these last couple of years, but he's still better than 90% of people wanna give him credit for. -
PanchoYoSancho wrote: »You can add all his rushing yards and rushing TDs to his passing stats, and he still isnt ? . The definition of feast or phantom. A poor man's QB version of Barry Sanders.
And I was born in this country, ? sucker.
wtf is this? -
bow to royalty wrote: »Romo is better than Vick.
Romo has 11 4th quarter comebacks, and 12 game winning drives in 68 drives
Vick has 10 4th quarter comebacks, and 11 game winning drives in I think 86 starts
But it's cool. ? won't let ? like comebacks and game winning drives trick them into thinkin sum1's clutch.
As great as P. Manning is until he won the ring wasn't clutch. You gotta have comebacks when it matters. -
rap doctor wrote: »lmaoooo how you going use compare starts and GW drives ? There's no correlation witht he point you're trying to make
haha man, that was a typo. Those are Romo's stats for 68 starts, and Vicks stats in 86 starts. Romo has 18 less games, but more comebacks. So to call Vick more clutch isn't true -
Shizlansky87 wrote: »As great as P. Manning is until he won the ring wasn't clutch. You gotta have comebacks when it matters.
haha ok then. Neither of them is clutch. That's the big knock on Romo, but if we're gonna make it an equal knock against Vick...Romo is easily better. -
-
-
bow to royalty wrote: »haha ok then. Neither of them is clutch. That's the big knock on Romo, but if we're gonna make it an equal knock against Vick...Romo is easily better.
Vick at least has as many playoff appearances as Romo as playoff wins and appearances combine so ima say he better IMO
This discussion has been closed.