Where do we rank Paul Pierce?
Options
Comments
-
a lot of feelings being caught but yall not really proving me wrong
Paul Pierce is a good, not great player and will go down as such
There's been plenty of good players come through the league
If you want to give him credit for his longevity, cool but he's not even one of the top 25 players of the 2000s -
a lot of feelings being caught but yall not really proving me wrong
Paul Pierce is a good, not great player and will go down as such
There's been plenty of good players come through the league
If you want to give him credit for his longevity, cool but he's not even one of the top 25 players of the 2000s
See here is the thing about his longevity its not as if he his just in the league to be in the league on some kurt thomas ? .. that longevity with diminishing values the last 8 years or so..
Paul Pierce has been fairly consistent in his greatness.. while not dynamic his results year after year dont lie..
some of those very people who were poppin in 2000 had a career where they were consistent for 5 years... hes played 14 Longevity isnt a demerit -
my point....he was never greatplaymaker88 wrote: »a lot of feelings being caught but yall not really proving me wrong
Paul Pierce is a good, not great player and will go down as such
There's been plenty of good players come through the league
If you want to give him credit for his longevity, cool but he's not even one of the top 25 players of the 2000s
See here is the thing about his longevity its not as if he his just in the league to be in the league on some kurt thomas ? .. that longevity with diminishing values the last 8 years or so..
Paul Pierce has been fairly consistent in his greatness.. while not dynamic his results year after year dont lie..
some of those very people who were poppin in 2000 had a career where they were consistent for 5 years... hes played 14 Longevity isnt a demerit
T Mac 00-03=Great
A.I. 01= Great
Kobe 06-08=Great
-
interesting.
-
my point....he was never greatplaymaker88 wrote: »a lot of feelings being caught but yall not really proving me wrong
Paul Pierce is a good, not great player and will go down as such
There's been plenty of good players come through the league
If you want to give him credit for his longevity, cool but he's not even one of the top 25 players of the 2000s
See here is the thing about his longevity its not as if he his just in the league to be in the league on some kurt thomas ? .. that longevity with diminishing values the last 8 years or so..
Paul Pierce has been fairly consistent in his greatness.. while not dynamic his results year after year dont lie..
some of those very people who were poppin in 2000 had a career where they were consistent for 5 years... hes played 14 Longevity isnt a demerit
T Mac 00-03=Great
A.I. 01= Great
Kobe 06-08=Great
Is Paul Pierce not a 4 time all NBA player? And a 10 time all-star? Damn, did not lebron James himself say Paul Pierce was the best @ the small forward position @ one point?..how is that not greatness? -
I don't even ? with Paul Pierce like that, I never was a fan, but i'm an honest guy.
The only reason A.I, V.C, Ray and Mac are all "better" , is because they were more popular.
If u look at the numbers from their prime years, PP match up hand to hand with each and everyone of them.
The only player from last decade that's ahead of PP, is Kobe.
but, i'll take PP Over Kobe EveryDAY. Kobe has the lowest I.Q I've witness from a STAR player of that level. Last Year was the worst, not only was the guy 33 he was 16 years in, and played with an I.Q of a rookie.
Your Star Player should always have one of or the highest I.Q on your team. -
My ? said Danny Granger tho.. could have said Peja and I would have been more incline to not think he's lost it.. but that's cuz Peja is my 3rd fav player all time
-
a lot of feelings being caught but yall not really proving me wrong
Paul Pierce is a good, not great player and will go down as such
There's been plenty of good players come through the league
If you want to give him credit for his longevity, cool but he's not even one of the top 25 players of the 2000s
i proved u wrong like 3 times wit each comparison on da last page " compare Rudy ? & Paul Pierce's numbers at age 25" remember? lol -
bruh just said he would take pierce before kobe....i rest my case
yall overrating the ? out that average ?
-
im not co-signing dat Kobe statement notice my O/P nd LOL @ 22ppg for his career being average u HAVE NO CASE u got abused last page wit stats u dont see how ridiculous u look rite now wit dis Pierce hate agenda?
-
keyword: I'LL take, ME ? ... how are u gonna catch feelings in what i'll do?bruh just said he would take pierce before kobe....i rest my case
yall overrating the ? out that average ?
Career Averages
Kobe:25.4 Ast: 4.7 Reb: 5.3 Stl:1.5 Blk .5 (16 years)
Paul: 22.0 Ast: 3.8 Reb: 6.0 Stl:1.5 Blk .6 (14 years)
these ? career wise are practically neck & neck -
no player that averages 22 for his career is great !
-
no player that averages 22 for his career is great !
damn dawg. u don't know ? about ? . sticks to doll houses.
Magic Johnson: 19.5
Larry Bird: 22.8
Isiah Thomas: 19.8
Charles Barkley: 22.1
Patrick Ewing:22.0
Hakeem Olajuwon: 21.9
Moses Malone : 20.6
David Robinson 21.1
Tim Duncan: 20.3
Clyde Drexler: 20.4 -
Bawse D.Lox wrote: »no player that averages 22 for his career is great !
damn dawg. u don't know ? about ? . sticks to doll houses.
Magic Johnson: 19.5
Larry Bird: 22.8
Isiah Thomas: 19.8
Charles Barkley: 22.1
Patrick Ewing:22.0
Hakeem Olajuwon: 21.9
Moses Malone : 20.6
David Robinson 21.1
Tim Duncan: 20.3
Clyde Drexler: 20.4
? , this ? is getting abused like he's one of Joe Jackson's kids.. stop it dawg, enough is enough
-
Good but not HOF worthy
-
Pierce will be in the hall especially with him being on the Celtics for his whole career.
-
Good but not HOF worthy
lmfao @ not being in da hall of fame, how? i see dis only by internet ? how is he not a hall of famer? a 10 time all-star, champion nd finals MVP nd 25th (and rising) all-time in scorin -
He's a top 75 player of all time.. maybe 50.
-
lol wow, Bawse D lox sonned the hell outta that durant loving lame with those numbers. hahahaha he got ghost quick
-
this thread smh..yes he's getting in the hall put in work for years ring finals mvp come on man
-
Another underrated stat Pierce is 19th all time in free throw attempts, one of the top 3 at getting to the line since hes been in the league, and stats dont even tell the whole story about how good he really is, how about the fact that he had to sacrifice his numbers once they brought the big 3 together, his scoring took a dip since 07 but you never see him complaining, this dude R.D. probably thought Gilbert Arenas was the greatest pg of all time the year he was averaging 29, you dont know ? bruh i'm sorry
-
I swear yall new ? get me sick just lookin at Stats lazy children of the ESPN neo stat generation
-
LMAO RD got destroyed multiple times in this thread.
Just leave cheap seats for a couple weeks u ? ? -
Bawse D.Lox wrote: »no player that averages 22 for his career is great !
damn dawg. u don't know ? about ? . sticks to doll houses.
Magic Johnson: 19.5
Larry Bird: 22.8
Isiah Thomas: 19.8
Charles Barkley: 22.1
Patrick Ewing:22.0
Hakeem Olajuwon: 21.9
Moses Malone : 20.6
David Robinson 21.1
Tim Duncan: 20.3
Clyde Drexler: 20.4
Clyde Drexler wasnt great !
Larrry Bird is the only one ill give you and he's great because of the championships and his shooting among other things
Those are the only two comparable players on your list, the rest of them play different positions, clown -
lmfao @ danny granger
