Why do modern-day Christians totally neglect the Sabbath?

Options
11112141617

Comments

  • bambu
    bambu Members Posts: 3,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2014
    Options
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    This ? beenwize is dumb AF.........


    your mom is dumb as ? put my ? in that ? mouth...

    IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO SAY "RAMESES" WITHOUT FIRST DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!!! YOU HAVE "RAMESES" IN A 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE BUT THERE WAS NO CONSTRUCT FOR THE EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS UNTIL CHAMPOLLION DECIPHERS "THE ROSETTA STONE" IN THE LATE 1700'S PRODUCING HIS FINDINGS IN 1822!!!!! THE GLYPHS RA AND MES ARE BELOW!!!! THIS IS WHAT GIVES YOU "RAMESES!!!!" WHO WAS IN THE COURT OF KING JAMES IN 1611, OR ANYBODY BEFORE HIM, DECIPHERING EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS, TO GIVE YOU THE NAME "RAMESES???????" THESE GLYPS ARE WHAT MAKE UP THE NAME "RAMESES", AND THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY THE WORD WITHOUT DECIPHERING THOSE TWO GLYPS!!!!! THAT DON'T COME UNTIL CHAMPOLLION IN 1822!!!!! "RAMESES" WAS PLACED INTO THE BIBLE MUCH LATER TO GIVE THE BIBLE VALIDITY!!!!!! EVEN TAHARQA!!!! THE BIBLE SPELLS IT TIRHAKAH!!! THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY EITHER WITHOUT DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!! WHO DID IT IN 1611 OR BEFORE?????? YOU WOULD EVEN HAVE TO DESTROY THE MYTH OF CHAMPOLLION BEING THE AUTHOR OF THE LANGUAGE!!!!! DAMN!!!!! IT'S LIKE FINDING JAMES, JOHN & ELLIOTT IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE AFRICANS BEFORE THE COMING OF THE ENGLISH!!!! HOW?????



    & Ramses is nowhere in the bible.......

    lol you ? ?

    Your mother is a white pale faced skank hoe ? .

    Exodus 1:11
    Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
    11 Therefore they did set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens. And they built for Pharaoh treasure cities, Pithom and Raamses.

    Genesis 47:11: This was the time when Joseph, through the command of Pharaoh, brought his father and siblings to the land of Egypt that was called the ‘land of Rameses.

    Isaiah 37:9
    9 And he heard say concerning Tirhakah king of Ethiopia, He is come forth to make war with thee. And when he heard it, he sent messengers to Hezekiah, saying,

    2 Kings 19:9
    9 And when he heard say of Tirhakah king of Ethiopia, Behold, he is come out to fight against thee: he sent messengers again unto Hezekiah, saying,

    [img]https://scontent-b-ord.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/1545005_10202959966578809_655410073_n.jpg[/img]

    IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO SAY "RAMESES" WITHOUT FIRST DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!!! YOU HAVE "RAMESES" IN A 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE BUT THERE WAS NO CONSTRUCT FOR THE EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS UNTIL CHAMPOLLION DECIPHERS "THE ROSETTA STONE" IN THE LATE 1700'S PRODUCING HIS FINDINGS IN 1822!!!!! THE GLYPHS RA AND MES ARE BELOW!!!! THIS IS WHAT GIVES YOU "RAMESES!!!!" WHO WAS IN THE COURT OF KING JAMES IN 1611, OR ANYBODY BEFORE HIM, DECIPHERING EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS, TO GIVE YOU THE NAME "RAMESES???????" THESE GLYPS ARE WHAT MAKE UP THE NAME "RAMESES", AND THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY THE WORD WITHOUT DECIPHERING THOSE TWO GLYPS!!!!! THAT DON'T COME UNTIL CHAMPOLLION IN 1822!!!!! "RAMESES" WAS PLACED INTO THE BIBLE MUCH LATER TO GIVE THE BIBLE VALIDITY!!!!!! EVEN TAHARQA!!!! THE BIBLE SPELLS IT TIRHAKAH!!! THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY EITHER WITHOUT DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!! WHO DID IT IN 1611 OR BEFORE?????? YOU WOULD EVEN HAVE TO DESTROY THE MYTH OF CHAMPOLLION BEING THE AUTHOR OF THE LANGUAGE!!!!! DAMN!!!!! IT'S LIKE FINDING JAMES, JOHN & ELLIOTT IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE AFRICANS BEFORE THE COMING OF THE ENGLISH!!!! HOW?????

    Scriptures mention Taharqa by name & describe his life......

    Only mentioning the "Land of Rameses" a physical location (Kingdom)...........

    Not an individual.......

    The scriptures were written in Hebrew 1st............

    WTF are you talking about.............

    So who did it before 1611??????

    Hebrews..........

    ? how the ? is the name Ramses in the Bible and you just said it was not in the Bible? How does that name get in the Bible if they didn't decifer the glyphs until the late 1700's and 1800's? lol now you have nothing to say. I made your ass look like a fool.

    The name RAMSES is in the Bible. You would have to know how to decifer it before hand you fool

    The name of the city "Rameses" is in the Bible, not the name of the Pharaoh.......

    The Bible refers to the Land of Rameses........

    Not the Pharaoh....

    It got into the Bible by the Hebrews that wrote it...........

    Dumb-ass ? ..........



    miṣ·ra·yim,
    מִצְרַ֔יִם
    of Egypt

    bə·mê·ṭaḇ
    בְּמֵיטַ֥ב
    in the best

    hā·’ā·reṣ
    הָאָ֖רֶץ
    of the land


    bə·’e·reṣ
    בְּאֶ֣רֶץ
    in the land

    ra‘·mə·sês;
    רַעְמְסֵ֑ס
    of Rameses

    ka·’ă·šer
    כַּאֲשֶׁ֖ר
    as
    Prt

    ṣiw·wāh
    צִוָּ֥ה
    had commanded

    p̄ar·‘ōh.
    פַרְעֹֽה׃
    Pharaoh

    So that whole conspiracy angle is garbage..............

    Just like your ? -ass moms.....
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    This ? beenwize is dumb AF.........


    your mom is dumb as ? put my ? in that ? mouth...

    IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO SAY "RAMESES" WITHOUT FIRST DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!!! YOU HAVE "RAMESES" IN A 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE BUT THERE WAS NO CONSTRUCT FOR THE EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS UNTIL CHAMPOLLION DECIPHERS "THE ROSETTA STONE" IN THE LATE 1700'S PRODUCING HIS FINDINGS IN 1822!!!!! THE GLYPHS RA AND MES ARE BELOW!!!! THIS IS WHAT GIVES YOU "RAMESES!!!!" WHO WAS IN THE COURT OF KING JAMES IN 1611, OR ANYBODY BEFORE HIM, DECIPHERING EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS, TO GIVE YOU THE NAME "RAMESES???????" THESE GLYPS ARE WHAT MAKE UP THE NAME "RAMESES", AND THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY THE WORD WITHOUT DECIPHERING THOSE TWO GLYPS!!!!! THAT DON'T COME UNTIL CHAMPOLLION IN 1822!!!!! "RAMESES" WAS PLACED INTO THE BIBLE MUCH LATER TO GIVE THE BIBLE VALIDITY!!!!!! EVEN TAHARQA!!!! THE BIBLE SPELLS IT TIRHAKAH!!! THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY EITHER WITHOUT DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!! WHO DID IT IN 1611 OR BEFORE?????? YOU WOULD EVEN HAVE TO DESTROY THE MYTH OF CHAMPOLLION BEING THE AUTHOR OF THE LANGUAGE!!!!! DAMN!!!!! IT'S LIKE FINDING JAMES, JOHN & ELLIOTT IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE AFRICANS BEFORE THE COMING OF THE ENGLISH!!!! HOW?????



    & Ramses is nowhere in the bible.......

    lol you ? ?

    Your mother is a white pale faced skank hoe ? .

    Exodus 1:11
    Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
    11 Therefore they did set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens. And they built for Pharaoh treasure cities, Pithom and Raamses.

    Genesis 47:11: This was the time when Joseph, through the command of Pharaoh, brought his father and siblings to the land of Egypt that was called the ‘land of Rameses.

    Isaiah 37:9
    9 And he heard say concerning Tirhakah king of Ethiopia, He is come forth to make war with thee. And when he heard it, he sent messengers to Hezekiah, saying,

    2 Kings 19:9
    9 And when he heard say of Tirhakah king of Ethiopia, Behold, he is come out to fight against thee: he sent messengers again unto Hezekiah, saying,

    [img]https://scontent-b-ord.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/1545005_10202959966578809_655410073_n.jpg[/img]

    IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO SAY "RAMESES" WITHOUT FIRST DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!!! YOU HAVE "RAMESES" IN A 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE BUT THERE WAS NO CONSTRUCT FOR THE EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS UNTIL CHAMPOLLION DECIPHERS "THE ROSETTA STONE" IN THE LATE 1700'S PRODUCING HIS FINDINGS IN 1822!!!!! THE GLYPHS RA AND MES ARE BELOW!!!! THIS IS WHAT GIVES YOU "RAMESES!!!!" WHO WAS IN THE COURT OF KING JAMES IN 1611, OR ANYBODY BEFORE HIM, DECIPHERING EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS, TO GIVE YOU THE NAME "RAMESES???????" THESE GLYPS ARE WHAT MAKE UP THE NAME "RAMESES", AND THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY THE WORD WITHOUT DECIPHERING THOSE TWO GLYPS!!!!! THAT DON'T COME UNTIL CHAMPOLLION IN 1822!!!!! "RAMESES" WAS PLACED INTO THE BIBLE MUCH LATER TO GIVE THE BIBLE VALIDITY!!!!!! EVEN TAHARQA!!!! THE BIBLE SPELLS IT TIRHAKAH!!! THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY EITHER WITHOUT DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!! WHO DID IT IN 1611 OR BEFORE?????? YOU WOULD EVEN HAVE TO DESTROY THE MYTH OF CHAMPOLLION BEING THE AUTHOR OF THE LANGUAGE!!!!! DAMN!!!!! IT'S LIKE FINDING JAMES, JOHN & ELLIOTT IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE AFRICANS BEFORE THE COMING OF THE ENGLISH!!!! HOW?????

    Scriptures mention Taharqa by name & describe his life......

    Only mentioning the "Land of Rameses" a physical location (Kingdom)...........

    Not an individual.......

    The scriptures were written in Hebrew 1st............

    WTF are you talking about.............

    So who did it before 1611??????

    Hebrews..........

    ? how the ? is the name Ramses in the Bible and you just said it was not in the Bible? How does that name get in the Bible if they didn't decifer the glyphs until the late 1700's and 1800's? lol now you have nothing to say. I made your ass look like a fool.

    The name RAMSES is in the Bible. You would have to know how to decifer it before hand you fool

    The name of the city "Rameses" is in the Bible, not the name of the Pharaoh.......

    The Bible refers to the Land of Rameses........

    Not the Pharaoh....

    It got into the Bible by the Hebrews that wrote it...........

    Dumb-ass ? ..........



    miṣ·ra·yim,
    מִצְרַ֔יִם
    of Egypt

    bə·mê·ṭaḇ
    בְּמֵיטַ֥ב
    in the best

    hā·’ā·reṣ
    הָאָ֖רֶץ
    of the land


    bə·’e·reṣ
    בְּאֶ֣רֶץ
    in the land

    ra‘·mə·sês;
    רַעְמְסֵ֑ס
    of Rameses

    ka·’ă·šer
    כַּאֲשֶׁ֖ר
    as
    Prt

    ṣiw·wāh
    צִוָּ֥ה
    had commanded

    p̄ar·‘ōh.
    פַרְעֹֽה׃
    Pharaoh



    ? boy you just said the name Ramses was NOWHERE in the Bible... so how are you now claiming that Hebrews put Ramses in the Bible? You just make up lies as you go. The only way to pronounce that name would be deciphering the gylgphs which were not done until the 1800's you fool.
  • bambu
    bambu Members Posts: 3,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    This ? beenwize is dumb AF.........


    your mom is dumb as ? put my ? in that ? mouth...

    IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO SAY "RAMESES" WITHOUT FIRST DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!!! YOU HAVE "RAMESES" IN A 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE BUT THERE WAS NO CONSTRUCT FOR THE EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS UNTIL CHAMPOLLION DECIPHERS "THE ROSETTA STONE" IN THE LATE 1700'S PRODUCING HIS FINDINGS IN 1822!!!!! THE GLYPHS RA AND MES ARE BELOW!!!! THIS IS WHAT GIVES YOU "RAMESES!!!!" WHO WAS IN THE COURT OF KING JAMES IN 1611, OR ANYBODY BEFORE HIM, DECIPHERING EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS, TO GIVE YOU THE NAME "RAMESES???????" THESE GLYPS ARE WHAT MAKE UP THE NAME "RAMESES", AND THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY THE WORD WITHOUT DECIPHERING THOSE TWO GLYPS!!!!! THAT DON'T COME UNTIL CHAMPOLLION IN 1822!!!!! "RAMESES" WAS PLACED INTO THE BIBLE MUCH LATER TO GIVE THE BIBLE VALIDITY!!!!!! EVEN TAHARQA!!!! THE BIBLE SPELLS IT TIRHAKAH!!! THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY EITHER WITHOUT DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!! WHO DID IT IN 1611 OR BEFORE?????? YOU WOULD EVEN HAVE TO DESTROY THE MYTH OF CHAMPOLLION BEING THE AUTHOR OF THE LANGUAGE!!!!! DAMN!!!!! IT'S LIKE FINDING JAMES, JOHN & ELLIOTT IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE AFRICANS BEFORE THE COMING OF THE ENGLISH!!!! HOW?????



    & Ramses is nowhere in the bible.......

    lol you ? ?

    Your mother is a white pale faced skank hoe ? .

    Exodus 1:11
    Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
    11 Therefore they did set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens. And they built for Pharaoh treasure cities, Pithom and Raamses.

    Genesis 47:11: This was the time when Joseph, through the command of Pharaoh, brought his father and siblings to the land of Egypt that was called the ‘land of Rameses.

    Isaiah 37:9
    9 And he heard say concerning Tirhakah king of Ethiopia, He is come forth to make war with thee. And when he heard it, he sent messengers to Hezekiah, saying,

    2 Kings 19:9
    9 And when he heard say of Tirhakah king of Ethiopia, Behold, he is come out to fight against thee: he sent messengers again unto Hezekiah, saying,

    [img]https://scontent-b-ord.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/1545005_10202959966578809_655410073_n.jpg[/img]

    IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO SAY "RAMESES" WITHOUT FIRST DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!!! YOU HAVE "RAMESES" IN A 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE BUT THERE WAS NO CONSTRUCT FOR THE EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS UNTIL CHAMPOLLION DECIPHERS "THE ROSETTA STONE" IN THE LATE 1700'S PRODUCING HIS FINDINGS IN 1822!!!!! THE GLYPHS RA AND MES ARE BELOW!!!! THIS IS WHAT GIVES YOU "RAMESES!!!!" WHO WAS IN THE COURT OF KING JAMES IN 1611, OR ANYBODY BEFORE HIM, DECIPHERING EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS, TO GIVE YOU THE NAME "RAMESES???????" THESE GLYPS ARE WHAT MAKE UP THE NAME "RAMESES", AND THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY THE WORD WITHOUT DECIPHERING THOSE TWO GLYPS!!!!! THAT DON'T COME UNTIL CHAMPOLLION IN 1822!!!!! "RAMESES" WAS PLACED INTO THE BIBLE MUCH LATER TO GIVE THE BIBLE VALIDITY!!!!!! EVEN TAHARQA!!!! THE BIBLE SPELLS IT TIRHAKAH!!! THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY EITHER WITHOUT DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!! WHO DID IT IN 1611 OR BEFORE?????? YOU WOULD EVEN HAVE TO DESTROY THE MYTH OF CHAMPOLLION BEING THE AUTHOR OF THE LANGUAGE!!!!! DAMN!!!!! IT'S LIKE FINDING JAMES, JOHN & ELLIOTT IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE AFRICANS BEFORE THE COMING OF THE ENGLISH!!!! HOW?????

    Scriptures mention Taharqa by name & describe his life......

    Only mentioning the "Land of Rameses" a physical location (Kingdom)...........

    Not an individual.......

    The scriptures were written in Hebrew 1st............

    WTF are you talking about.............

    So who did it before 1611??????

    Hebrews..........

    ? how the ? is the name Ramses in the Bible and you just said it was not in the Bible? How does that name get in the Bible if they didn't decifer the glyphs until the late 1700's and 1800's? lol now you have nothing to say. I made your ass look like a fool.

    The name RAMSES is in the Bible. You would have to know how to decifer it before hand you fool

    The name of the city "Rameses" is in the Bible, not the name of the Pharaoh.......

    The Bible refers to the Land of Rameses........

    Not the Pharaoh....

    It got into the Bible by the Hebrews that wrote it...........

    Dumb-ass ? ..........



    miṣ·ra·yim,
    מִצְרַ֔יִם
    of Egypt

    bə·mê·ṭaḇ
    בְּמֵיטַ֥ב
    in the best

    hā·’ā·reṣ
    הָאָ֖רֶץ
    of the land


    bə·’e·reṣ
    בְּאֶ֣רֶץ
    in the land

    ra‘·mə·sês;
    רַעְמְסֵ֑ס
    of Rameses

    ka·’ă·šer
    כַּאֲשֶׁ֖ר
    as
    Prt

    ṣiw·wāh
    צִוָּ֥ה
    had commanded

    p̄ar·‘ōh.
    פַרְעֹֽה׃
    Pharaoh



    ? boy you just said the name Ramses was NOWHERE in the Bible... so how are you now claiming that Hebrews put Ramses in the Bible? You just make up lies as you go. The only way to pronounce that name would be deciphering the gylgphs which were not done until the 1800's you fool.

    No, I said Rameses is nowhere in the Bible.......

    He is not.........

    So the Hebrew that wrote this circa 1500 B.C.E......

    ra‘·mə·sês;
    רַעְמְסֵ֑ס
    of Rameses

    Had no way of pronouncing it until the 1800's??????

    You are a ? ? ............

  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    This ? beenwize is dumb AF.........


    your mom is dumb as ? put my ? in that ? mouth...

    IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO SAY "RAMESES" WITHOUT FIRST DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!!! YOU HAVE "RAMESES" IN A 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE BUT THERE WAS NO CONSTRUCT FOR THE EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS UNTIL CHAMPOLLION DECIPHERS "THE ROSETTA STONE" IN THE LATE 1700'S PRODUCING HIS FINDINGS IN 1822!!!!! THE GLYPHS RA AND MES ARE BELOW!!!! THIS IS WHAT GIVES YOU "RAMESES!!!!" WHO WAS IN THE COURT OF KING JAMES IN 1611, OR ANYBODY BEFORE HIM, DECIPHERING EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS, TO GIVE YOU THE NAME "RAMESES???????" THESE GLYPS ARE WHAT MAKE UP THE NAME "RAMESES", AND THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY THE WORD WITHOUT DECIPHERING THOSE TWO GLYPS!!!!! THAT DON'T COME UNTIL CHAMPOLLION IN 1822!!!!! "RAMESES" WAS PLACED INTO THE BIBLE MUCH LATER TO GIVE THE BIBLE VALIDITY!!!!!! EVEN TAHARQA!!!! THE BIBLE SPELLS IT TIRHAKAH!!! THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY EITHER WITHOUT DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!! WHO DID IT IN 1611 OR BEFORE?????? YOU WOULD EVEN HAVE TO DESTROY THE MYTH OF CHAMPOLLION BEING THE AUTHOR OF THE LANGUAGE!!!!! DAMN!!!!! IT'S LIKE FINDING JAMES, JOHN & ELLIOTT IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE AFRICANS BEFORE THE COMING OF THE ENGLISH!!!! HOW?????



    & Ramses is nowhere in the bible.......

    lol you ? ?

    Your mother is a white pale faced skank hoe ? .

    Exodus 1:11
    Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
    11 Therefore they did set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens. And they built for Pharaoh treasure cities, Pithom and Raamses.

    Genesis 47:11: This was the time when Joseph, through the command of Pharaoh, brought his father and siblings to the land of Egypt that was called the ‘land of Rameses.

    Isaiah 37:9
    9 And he heard say concerning Tirhakah king of Ethiopia, He is come forth to make war with thee. And when he heard it, he sent messengers to Hezekiah, saying,

    2 Kings 19:9
    9 And when he heard say of Tirhakah king of Ethiopia, Behold, he is come out to fight against thee: he sent messengers again unto Hezekiah, saying,

    [img]https://scontent-b-ord.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/1545005_10202959966578809_655410073_n.jpg[/img]

    IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO SAY "RAMESES" WITHOUT FIRST DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!!! YOU HAVE "RAMESES" IN A 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE BUT THERE WAS NO CONSTRUCT FOR THE EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS UNTIL CHAMPOLLION DECIPHERS "THE ROSETTA STONE" IN THE LATE 1700'S PRODUCING HIS FINDINGS IN 1822!!!!! THE GLYPHS RA AND MES ARE BELOW!!!! THIS IS WHAT GIVES YOU "RAMESES!!!!" WHO WAS IN THE COURT OF KING JAMES IN 1611, OR ANYBODY BEFORE HIM, DECIPHERING EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS, TO GIVE YOU THE NAME "RAMESES???????" THESE GLYPS ARE WHAT MAKE UP THE NAME "RAMESES", AND THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY THE WORD WITHOUT DECIPHERING THOSE TWO GLYPS!!!!! THAT DON'T COME UNTIL CHAMPOLLION IN 1822!!!!! "RAMESES" WAS PLACED INTO THE BIBLE MUCH LATER TO GIVE THE BIBLE VALIDITY!!!!!! EVEN TAHARQA!!!! THE BIBLE SPELLS IT TIRHAKAH!!! THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY EITHER WITHOUT DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!! WHO DID IT IN 1611 OR BEFORE?????? YOU WOULD EVEN HAVE TO DESTROY THE MYTH OF CHAMPOLLION BEING THE AUTHOR OF THE LANGUAGE!!!!! DAMN!!!!! IT'S LIKE FINDING JAMES, JOHN & ELLIOTT IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE AFRICANS BEFORE THE COMING OF THE ENGLISH!!!! HOW?????

    @bambu while your ? ass said Ramses was nowhere in the Bible and I proved your ? ass wrong now you want to buckdance your ? ass out of it.. Tirhakah is in there as well so how the ? he in there if it wasn't translated until the 1800's.
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    This ? beenwize is dumb AF.........


    your mom is dumb as ? put my ? in that ? mouth...

    IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO SAY "RAMESES" WITHOUT FIRST DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!!! YOU HAVE "RAMESES" IN A 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE BUT THERE WAS NO CONSTRUCT FOR THE EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS UNTIL CHAMPOLLION DECIPHERS "THE ROSETTA STONE" IN THE LATE 1700'S PRODUCING HIS FINDINGS IN 1822!!!!! THE GLYPHS RA AND MES ARE BELOW!!!! THIS IS WHAT GIVES YOU "RAMESES!!!!" WHO WAS IN THE COURT OF KING JAMES IN 1611, OR ANYBODY BEFORE HIM, DECIPHERING EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS, TO GIVE YOU THE NAME "RAMESES???????" THESE GLYPS ARE WHAT MAKE UP THE NAME "RAMESES", AND THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY THE WORD WITHOUT DECIPHERING THOSE TWO GLYPS!!!!! THAT DON'T COME UNTIL CHAMPOLLION IN 1822!!!!! "RAMESES" WAS PLACED INTO THE BIBLE MUCH LATER TO GIVE THE BIBLE VALIDITY!!!!!! EVEN TAHARQA!!!! THE BIBLE SPELLS IT TIRHAKAH!!! THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY EITHER WITHOUT DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!! WHO DID IT IN 1611 OR BEFORE?????? YOU WOULD EVEN HAVE TO DESTROY THE MYTH OF CHAMPOLLION BEING THE AUTHOR OF THE LANGUAGE!!!!! DAMN!!!!! IT'S LIKE FINDING JAMES, JOHN & ELLIOTT IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE AFRICANS BEFORE THE COMING OF THE ENGLISH!!!! HOW?????



    & Ramses is nowhere in the bible.......

    lol you ? ?

    Your mother is a white pale faced skank hoe ? .

    Exodus 1:11
    Authorized (King James) Version (AKJV)
    11 Therefore they did set over them taskmasters to afflict them with their burdens. And they built for Pharaoh treasure cities, Pithom and Raamses.

    Genesis 47:11: This was the time when Joseph, through the command of Pharaoh, brought his father and siblings to the land of Egypt that was called the ‘land of Rameses.

    Isaiah 37:9
    9 And he heard say concerning Tirhakah king of Ethiopia, He is come forth to make war with thee. And when he heard it, he sent messengers to Hezekiah, saying,

    2 Kings 19:9
    9 And when he heard say of Tirhakah king of Ethiopia, Behold, he is come out to fight against thee: he sent messengers again unto Hezekiah, saying,

    [img]https://scontent-b-ord.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/1545005_10202959966578809_655410073_n.jpg[/img]

    IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO SAY "RAMESES" WITHOUT FIRST DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!!! YOU HAVE "RAMESES" IN A 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE BUT THERE WAS NO CONSTRUCT FOR THE EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS UNTIL CHAMPOLLION DECIPHERS "THE ROSETTA STONE" IN THE LATE 1700'S PRODUCING HIS FINDINGS IN 1822!!!!! THE GLYPHS RA AND MES ARE BELOW!!!! THIS IS WHAT GIVES YOU "RAMESES!!!!" WHO WAS IN THE COURT OF KING JAMES IN 1611, OR ANYBODY BEFORE HIM, DECIPHERING EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS, TO GIVE YOU THE NAME "RAMESES???????" THESE GLYPS ARE WHAT MAKE UP THE NAME "RAMESES", AND THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY THE WORD WITHOUT DECIPHERING THOSE TWO GLYPS!!!!! THAT DON'T COME UNTIL CHAMPOLLION IN 1822!!!!! "RAMESES" WAS PLACED INTO THE BIBLE MUCH LATER TO GIVE THE BIBLE VALIDITY!!!!!! EVEN TAHARQA!!!! THE BIBLE SPELLS IT TIRHAKAH!!! THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY EITHER WITHOUT DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!! WHO DID IT IN 1611 OR BEFORE?????? YOU WOULD EVEN HAVE TO DESTROY THE MYTH OF CHAMPOLLION BEING THE AUTHOR OF THE LANGUAGE!!!!! DAMN!!!!! IT'S LIKE FINDING JAMES, JOHN & ELLIOTT IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE AFRICANS BEFORE THE COMING OF THE ENGLISH!!!! HOW?????

    Scriptures mention Taharqa by name & describe his life......

    Only mentioning the "Land of Rameses" a physical location (Kingdom)...........

    Not an individual.......

    The scriptures were written in Hebrew 1st............

    WTF are you talking about.............

    So who did it before 1611??????

    Hebrews..........

    ? how the ? is the name Ramses in the Bible and you just said it was not in the Bible? How does that name get in the Bible if they didn't decifer the glyphs until the late 1700's and 1800's? lol now you have nothing to say. I made your ass look like a fool.

    The name RAMSES is in the Bible. You would have to know how to decifer it before hand you fool

    The name of the city "Rameses" is in the Bible, not the name of the Pharaoh.......

    The Bible refers to the Land of Rameses........

    Not the Pharaoh....

    It got into the Bible by the Hebrews that wrote it...........

    Dumb-ass ? ..........



    miṣ·ra·yim,
    מִצְרַ֔יִם
    of Egypt

    bə·mê·ṭaḇ
    בְּמֵיטַ֥ב
    in the best

    hā·’ā·reṣ
    הָאָ֖רֶץ
    of the land


    bə·’e·reṣ
    בְּאֶ֣רֶץ
    in the land

    ra‘·mə·sês;
    רַעְמְסֵ֑ס
    of Rameses

    ka·’ă·šer
    כַּאֲשֶׁ֖ר
    as
    Prt

    ṣiw·wāh
    צִוָּ֥ה
    had commanded

    p̄ar·‘ōh.
    פַרְעֹֽה׃
    Pharaoh



    ? boy you just said the name Ramses was NOWHERE in the Bible... so how are you now claiming that Hebrews put Ramses in the Bible? You just make up lies as you go. The only way to pronounce that name would be deciphering the gylgphs which were not done until the 1800's you fool.

    No, I said Rameses is nowhere in the Bible.......

    He is not.........

    So the Hebrew that wrote this circa 1500 B.C.E......

    ra‘·mə·sês;
    רַעְמְסֵ֑ס
    of Rameses

    Had no way of pronouncing it until the 1800's??????

    You are a ? ? ............

    ? the land of Ramses is the ? translation itself so how the ? are you stuck on if it is the Pharaoh or the city. you would still have to translate it from the glyphs either way. and Tirhakah is in their as well ? boy.
  • bambu
    bambu Members Posts: 3,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    No, I said Rameses is nowhere in the Bible.......

    & he is not.........



    So the Hebrew that wrote this circa 1500 B.C.E......

    ra‘·mə·sês;
    רַעְמְסֵ֑ס
    of Rameses

    Had no way of pronouncing it until the 1800's??????

    You are a ? ? ............

    You and the BPC..........

  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    Judah Back wrote: »
    @beenwize yo ? ass ? iz Satan, he and his servants scared to speak of my ? by name cuz he been a dumb ? ass ? from the beginning . He an admitted ? ask me for proof


    Yo serpent ? likes ? and I got biblical proof, plzzzzzz ask me for it.


    @beenwize only a ? dammned ? would believe anything this ? beewize say, a 3rd grader could read those chapters and havr a better understanding than him

    why the ? haven't you answer the question yet? since page 5 you have not answered this question... lol
    You are a Hebrew Israelite so tell me if you been in America for hundreds of years being enslaved and oppressed why does it say that ? is rejoicing to destroy you? Rejoicing means happy. So tell me what was Satan doing while ? is rejoicing to destroy you?

    also to you @zombie

    Deuteronomy 28:63
    And it shall come to pass, that as the LORD rejoiced over you to do you good, and to multiply you; so the LORD will rejoice over you to destroy you, and to bring you to nought; and ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it

    I have no problem with deuteronomy 28:63 what the ? is your point?

    Answer the ? question dumb ? ... What was Satan doing while Yahweh was rejoicing to destroy? Hebrew Israelite says that scripture pertains to blacks in America for hundreds of years so if ? is rejoicing to destroy blacks for this long then what exactly is Satan doing? answer that.

    What the ? kind of stupid question are your asking me. deuteronomy 28 is about what will happen if israel goes astray it has nothing to do with the devil. It's just a punishment from ? and that is it.

    satan could careless what happens to anyone.

    ? if Satan is the theif, liar, and murderer then explain to me what he is doing while ? is "rejoicing" to destroy ppl? Is Satan also rejoicing? lol you can't answer that ? question and Hebrew Israelites use that scripture to say blacks were punished by Yahweh in America so therefore during the slave trade, lynchings, and everything else ? was rejoicing to destroy us? as a punishment? smh

    I am not a ? hewbrew isralite and do not agree with them on much. Satan is doing what satan always does and ? being happy to punish his children for their own good has nothing to do with satan,

    you are a sick ? just like your false ? .. so your ? is rejoicing lychings, enslaving ppl, and murdering ppl. look at the native Indians, and all these atrocities and your ? is rejoicing aka happy for that and you find that loving? would it not be good for those specific ppl that sinned then why is he rejoicing to destroy their innocent children hundreds of years later? that's not love. that's a sickness and you are sick too.

    Maybe you did not read where i said i am not a hebrew. Their doctrine of native americans really being A tribe of israel is not one that i share.

    it don't matter if you are Hebrew or not the question still remains. how is your ? rejoicing to destroy innocent decendents of ppl that sinned against him hundreds and thousands of years ago? Lol

    He's not you stupid ? the punishment israel got that was promised if they went astray happened already. ? off with linking the suffering of the native americans with deuto 28. i am not a hebrew so i don't subcribe to the belief that the sufferings of black and native people have anything to do with Punishments ? gave israel for doing wrong

    you dumb fool im not talking about native americans right now since you too ? to answer that question... when did deut 28 happen? show me some documented history outside the bible on when it happened and who it happened to?

    You ask me to give you proof of some thing that happened in the bible but you want the answers to come from outside it. but anyway in the bible ? told israel that if you stray i will punish you and he did just that.

    babylonian exile, persian ? and finally roman destruction.

    I ANSWERED YOU About the native americans ? they have nothing to do with israel ? the ? IS wrong with you people have answered you. Every ? question you bring i have answered.
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    where you at @bambu [img]https://scontent-b-ord.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/1545005_10202959966578809_655410073_n.jpg[/img]
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    Judah Back wrote: »
    @beenwize yo ? ass ? iz Satan, he and his servants scared to speak of my ? by name cuz he been a dumb ? ass ? from the beginning . He an admitted ? ask me for proof


    Yo serpent ? likes ? and I got biblical proof, plzzzzzz ask me for it.


    @beenwize only a ? dammned ? would believe anything this ? beewize say, a 3rd grader could read those chapters and havr a better understanding than him

    why the ? haven't you answer the question yet? since page 5 you have not answered this question... lol
    You are a Hebrew Israelite so tell me if you been in America for hundreds of years being enslaved and oppressed why does it say that ? is rejoicing to destroy you? Rejoicing means happy. So tell me what was Satan doing while ? is rejoicing to destroy you?

    also to you @zombie

    Deuteronomy 28:63
    And it shall come to pass, that as the LORD rejoiced over you to do you good, and to multiply you; so the LORD will rejoice over you to destroy you, and to bring you to nought; and ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it

    I have no problem with deuteronomy 28:63 what the ? is your point?

    Answer the ? question dumb ? ... What was Satan doing while Yahweh was rejoicing to destroy? Hebrew Israelite says that scripture pertains to blacks in America for hundreds of years so if ? is rejoicing to destroy blacks for this long then what exactly is Satan doing? answer that.

    What the ? kind of stupid question are your asking me. deuteronomy 28 is about what will happen if israel goes astray it has nothing to do with the devil. It's just a punishment from ? and that is it.

    satan could careless what happens to anyone.

    ? if Satan is the theif, liar, and murderer then explain to me what he is doing while ? is "rejoicing" to destroy ppl? Is Satan also rejoicing? lol you can't answer that ? question and Hebrew Israelites use that scripture to say blacks were punished by Yahweh in America so therefore during the slave trade, lynchings, and everything else ? was rejoicing to destroy us? as a punishment? smh

    I am not a ? hewbrew isralite and do not agree with them on much. Satan is doing what satan always does and ? being happy to punish his children for their own good has nothing to do with satan,

    you are a sick ? just like your false ? .. so your ? is rejoicing lychings, enslaving ppl, and murdering ppl. look at the native Indians, and all these atrocities and your ? is rejoicing aka happy for that and you find that loving? would it not be good for those specific ppl that sinned then why is he rejoicing to destroy their innocent children hundreds of years later? that's not love. that's a sickness and you are sick too.

    Maybe you did not read where i said i am not a hebrew. Their doctrine of native americans really being A tribe of israel is not one that i share.

    it don't matter if you are Hebrew or not the question still remains. how is your ? rejoicing to destroy innocent decendents of ppl that sinned against him hundreds and thousands of years ago? Lol

    He's not you stupid ? the punishment israel got that was promised if they went astray happened already. ? off with linking the suffering of the native americans with deuto 28. i am not a hebrew so i don't subcribe to the belief that the sufferings of black and native people have anything to do with Punishments ? gave israel for doing wrong

    you dumb fool im not talking about native americans right now since you too ? to answer that question... when did deut 28 happen? show me some documented history outside the bible on when it happened and who it happened to?

    You ask me to give you proof of some thing that happened in the bible but you want the answers to come from outside it. but anyway in the bible ? told israel that if you stray i will punish you and he did just that.

    babylonian exile, persian ? and finally roman destruction.

    I ANSWERED YOU About the native americans ? they have nothing to do with israel ? the ? IS wrong with you people have answered you. Every ? question you bring i have answered.

    show me the historical facts of deut 28 happening in life without the BIble. If you say the BIble is history and you living in the world shouldn't it be easy to show me this happening in the world? lol
  • bambu
    bambu Members Posts: 3,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    beenwize wrote: »
    where you at @bambu [img]https://scontent-b-ord.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/1545005_10202959966578809_655410073_n.jpg[/img]

    There are only three pharaohs mentioned by name in the Bible.....

    ? ......

    Historical pharaohs: Taharqa, Necho and Apries/Hophra


    2 Kings 19:9 and Isaiah 37:9 mention Taharqa (reigned 690-664 BC) as the opponent of Sennacherib of Assyria. He is called King of Ethiopia, and hence is not given the title pharaoh which he bears in Egyptian documents.

    2 Kings 23:29 sqq. and 2 Chronicles 35:20 sqq. mention the 26th dynasty pharaoh Necho II (610-595 BC), responsible for the death of Josiah, and Jeremiah 44:30 mentions his successor Apries or Hophra (589-570 BC).
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    where you at @bambu [img]https://scontent-b-ord.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/1545005_10202959966578809_655410073_n.jpg[/img]

    There are only three pharaohs mentioned by name in the Bible.....

    ? ......

    Historical pharaohs: Taharqa, Necho and Apries/Hophra


    2 Kings 19:9 and Isaiah 37:9 mention Taharqa (reigned 690-664 BC) as the opponent of Sennacherib of Assyria. He is called King of Ethiopia, and hence is not given the title pharaoh which he bears in Egyptian documents.

    2 Kings 23:29 sqq. and 2 Chronicles 35:20 sqq. mention the 26th dynasty pharaoh Necho II (610-595 BC), responsible for the death of Josiah, and Jeremiah 44:30 mentions his successor Apries or Hophra (589-570 BC).

    duh you ? piece of ? so how the ? is the Pharoah in the BIble and the glyphs were not translated until the 1800's ????? lol you have yet to provide evidence on how they got in the bible. at first you said the name of Ramses was nowhere in the BIble and I proved your lying ass to be a lie.

    [img]https://scontent-b-ord.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/1486865_10202958550543409_1472897806_n.jpg[/img]
  • bambu
    bambu Members Posts: 3,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    ? ....

    The Pharaoh Ramses is not mentioned in the Bible.....

    The bible was written in Hebrew with this in it before Europeans attempted to translate it.......

    רַעְמְסֵ֑ס

    It translates to "of Ramses" in English.....

    What?????
  • bambu
    bambu Members Posts: 3,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Strong's Concordance

    Raamses or Rameses: a city in Egypt
    Original Word: רַעַמְסֵס
    Part of Speech: Proper Name Location
    Transliteration: Raamses or Rameses
    Phonetic Spelling: (rah-mes-ace')
    Short Definition: Rameses


  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    bambu wrote: »
    ? ....

    The Pharaoh Ramses is not mentioned in the Bible.....

    The bible was written in Hebrew with this in it before Europeans attempted to translate it.......

    רַעְמְסֵ֑ס

    It translates to "of Ramses" in English.....

    What?????

    did you ride the short bus to school? the point is not whether or not if the Pharaoh himself is in the BIble. The point is that the name itself appears in the Bible when you said it was nowhere in the Bible. So how does it appear in a Bible when the glyphs were not translated until the 1800's? if that name appeared in the Bible in the 1600's then they would have been able to use that name to help them translate other glyphs you fool. And you keep buckdancing away from the other Taharqa that appears in the Bible.

    [img]https://scontent-b-ord.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/1486865_10202958550543409_1472897806_n.jpg[/img]
  • bambu
    bambu Members Posts: 3,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    We don't believe Jew..........

    You need more Hebrew..........


  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2014
    Options
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    Judah Back wrote: »
    @beenwize yo ? ass ? iz Satan, he and his servants scared to speak of my ? by name cuz he been a dumb ? ass ? from the beginning . He an admitted ? ask me for proof


    Yo serpent ? likes ? and I got biblical proof, plzzzzzz ask me for it.


    @beenwize only a ? dammned ? would believe anything this ? beewize say, a 3rd grader could read those chapters and havr a better understanding than him

    why the ? haven't you answer the question yet? since page 5 you have not answered this question... lol
    You are a Hebrew Israelite so tell me if you been in America for hundreds of years being enslaved and oppressed why does it say that ? is rejoicing to destroy you? Rejoicing means happy. So tell me what was Satan doing while ? is rejoicing to destroy you?

    also to you @zombie

    Deuteronomy 28:63
    And it shall come to pass, that as the LORD rejoiced over you to do you good, and to multiply you; so the LORD will rejoice over you to destroy you, and to bring you to nought; and ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it

    I have no problem with deuteronomy 28:63 what the ? is your point?

    Answer the ? question dumb ? ... What was Satan doing while Yahweh was rejoicing to destroy? Hebrew Israelite says that scripture pertains to blacks in America for hundreds of years so if ? is rejoicing to destroy blacks for this long then what exactly is Satan doing? answer that.

    What the ? kind of stupid question are your asking me. deuteronomy 28 is about what will happen if israel goes astray it has nothing to do with the devil. It's just a punishment from ? and that is it.

    satan could careless what happens to anyone.

    ? if Satan is the theif, liar, and murderer then explain to me what he is doing while ? is "rejoicing" to destroy ppl? Is Satan also rejoicing? lol you can't answer that ? question and Hebrew Israelites use that scripture to say blacks were punished by Yahweh in America so therefore during the slave trade, lynchings, and everything else ? was rejoicing to destroy us? as a punishment? smh

    I am not a ? hewbrew isralite and do not agree with them on much. Satan is doing what satan always does and ? being happy to punish his children for their own good has nothing to do with satan,

    you are a sick ? just like your false ? .. so your ? is rejoicing lychings, enslaving ppl, and murdering ppl. look at the native Indians, and all these atrocities and your ? is rejoicing aka happy for that and you find that loving? would it not be good for those specific ppl that sinned then why is he rejoicing to destroy their innocent children hundreds of years later? that's not love. that's a sickness and you are sick too.

    Maybe you did not read where i said i am not a hebrew. Their doctrine of native americans really being A tribe of israel is not one that i share.

    it don't matter if you are Hebrew or not the question still remains. how is your ? rejoicing to destroy innocent decendents of ppl that sinned against him hundreds and thousands of years ago? Lol

    He's not you stupid ? the punishment israel got that was promised if they went astray happened already. ? off with linking the suffering of the native americans with deuto 28. i am not a hebrew so i don't subcribe to the belief that the sufferings of black and native people have anything to do with Punishments ? gave israel for doing wrong

    you dumb fool im not talking about native americans right now since you too ? to answer that question... when did deut 28 happen? show me some documented history outside the bible on when it happened and who it happened to?

    You ask me to give you proof of some thing that happened in the bible but you want the answers to come from outside it. but anyway in the bible ? told israel that if you stray i will punish you and he did just that.

    babylonian exile, persian ? and finally roman destruction.

    I ANSWERED YOU About the native americans ? they have nothing to do with israel ? the ? IS wrong with you people have answered you. Every ? question you bring i have answered.

    show me the historical facts of deut 28 happening in life without the BIble. If you say the BIble is history and you living in the world shouldn't it be easy to show me this happening in the world? lol

    look ? deuto 28 lists tons of punishments that ? would bring on israel if they ? up. i won't be going through all of them but deuto could very have happened when any one the major empires of earlier times conquered israel for example when rome destroyed israel for rebellion

    49 The Lord shall bring a nation against thee from far, from the end of the earth, as swift as the eagle flieth; a nation whose tongue thou shalt not understand;

    50 A nation of fierce countenance, which shall not regard the person of the old, nor shew favour to the young:

    51 And he shall eat the fruit of thy cattle, and the fruit of thy land, until thou be destroyed: which also shall not leave thee either corn, wine, or oil, or the increase of thy kine, or flocks of thy sheep, until he have destroyed thee.

    52 And he shall besiege thee in all thy gates, until thy high and fenced walls come down, wherein thou trustedst, throughout all thy land: and he shall besiege thee in all thy gates throughout all thy land, which the Lord thy ? hath given thee.

    53 And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters, which the Lord thy ? hath given thee, in the siege, and in the straitness, wherewith thine enemies shall distress thee:


    we KNOW from josephus THAT THE roman destruction of judea was so harsh that jews turned to cannabalism
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    bambu wrote: »
    We don't believe Jew..........

    You need more Hebrew..........


    we don't believe jew

    you need more glyphs....

    [img]https://scontent-b-ord.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/1486865_10202958550543409_1472897806_n.jpg[/img]

  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    edited January 2014
    Options
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    Judah Back wrote: »
    @beenwize yo ? ass ? iz Satan, he and his servants scared to speak of my ? by name cuz he been a dumb ? ass ? from the beginning . He an admitted ? ask me for proof


    Yo serpent ? likes ? and I got biblical proof, plzzzzzz ask me for it.


    @beenwize only a ? dammned ? would believe anything this ? beewize say, a 3rd grader could read those chapters and havr a better understanding than him

    why the ? haven't you answer the question yet? since page 5 you have not answered this question... lol
    You are a Hebrew Israelite so tell me if you been in America for hundreds of years being enslaved and oppressed why does it say that ? is rejoicing to destroy you? Rejoicing means happy. So tell me what was Satan doing while ? is rejoicing to destroy you?

    also to you @zombie

    Deuteronomy 28:63
    And it shall come to pass, that as the LORD rejoiced over you to do you good, and to multiply you; so the LORD will rejoice over you to destroy you, and to bring you to nought; and ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it

    I have no problem with deuteronomy 28:63 what the ? is your point?

    Answer the ? question dumb ? ... What was Satan doing while Yahweh was rejoicing to destroy? Hebrew Israelite says that scripture pertains to blacks in America for hundreds of years so if ? is rejoicing to destroy blacks for this long then what exactly is Satan doing? answer that.

    What the ? kind of stupid question are your asking me. deuteronomy 28 is about what will happen if israel goes astray it has nothing to do with the devil. It's just a punishment from ? and that is it.

    satan could careless what happens to anyone.

    ? if Satan is the theif, liar, and murderer then explain to me what he is doing while ? is "rejoicing" to destroy ppl? Is Satan also rejoicing? lol you can't answer that ? question and Hebrew Israelites use that scripture to say blacks were punished by Yahweh in America so therefore during the slave trade, lynchings, and everything else ? was rejoicing to destroy us? as a punishment? smh

    I am not a ? hewbrew isralite and do not agree with them on much. Satan is doing what satan always does and ? being happy to punish his children for their own good has nothing to do with satan,

    you are a sick ? just like your false ? .. so your ? is rejoicing lychings, enslaving ppl, and murdering ppl. look at the native Indians, and all these atrocities and your ? is rejoicing aka happy for that and you find that loving? would it not be good for those specific ppl that sinned then why is he rejoicing to destroy their innocent children hundreds of years later? that's not love. that's a sickness and you are sick too.

    Maybe you did not read where i said i am not a hebrew. Their doctrine of native americans really being A tribe of israel is not one that i share.

    it don't matter if you are Hebrew or not the question still remains. how is your ? rejoicing to destroy innocent decendents of ppl that sinned against him hundreds and thousands of years ago? Lol

    He's not you stupid ? the punishment israel got that was promised if they went astray happened already. ? off with linking the suffering of the native americans with deuto 28. i am not a hebrew so i don't subcribe to the belief that the sufferings of black and native people have anything to do with Punishments ? gave israel for doing wrong

    you dumb fool im not talking about native americans right now since you too ? to answer that question... when did deut 28 happen? show me some documented history outside the bible on when it happened and who it happened to?

    You ask me to give you proof of some thing that happened in the bible but you want the answers to come from outside it. but anyway in the bible ? told israel that if you stray i will punish you and he did just that.

    babylonian exile, persian ? and finally roman destruction.

    I ANSWERED YOU About the native americans ? they have nothing to do with israel ? the ? IS wrong with you people have answered you. Every ? question you bring i have answered.

    show me the historical facts of deut 28 happening in life without the BIble. If you say the BIble is history and you living in the world shouldn't it be easy to show me this happening in the world? lol

    look ? deuto 28 lists tons of punishments that ? would bring on israel if they ? up. i won't be going through all of them but deuto could very have happened when any one the major empires of earlier times conquered israel for example when rome destroyed israel for rebellion

    49 The Lord shall bring a nation against thee from far, from the end of the earth, as swift as the eagle flieth; a nation whose tongue thou shalt not understand;

    50 A nation of fierce countenance, which shall not regard the person of the old, nor shew favour to the young:

    51 And he shall eat the fruit of thy cattle, and the fruit of thy land, until thou be destroyed: which also shall not leave thee either corn, wine, or oil, or the increase of thy kine, or flocks of thy sheep, until he have destroyed thee.

    52 And he shall besiege thee in all thy gates, until thy high and fenced walls come down, wherein thou trustedst, throughout all thy land: and he shall besiege thee in all thy gates throughout all thy land, which the Lord thy ? hath given thee.

    53 And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters, which the Lord thy ? hath given thee, in the siege, and in the straitness, wherewith thine enemies shall distress thee:


    we KNOW from josephus THAT THE roman destruction of judea was so harsh that jews turned to cannabalism

    Show all this happening in history so that we can see who in reality was your ? rejoicing to destroy. was it the holucust that your ? was rejoicing about? was it the trans atlantic slave trade? was it the massacre of native Indians that your ? rejoiced about? what was it?
  • bambu
    bambu Members Posts: 3,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    We don't believe Jew..........

    You need more Hebrew..........


    we don't believe jew

    you need more glyphs....

    [img]https://scontent-b-ord.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/1486865_10202958550543409_1472897806_n.jpg[/img]

    The ? that made that gif is just as stupid as you.....

    Ramses was written in Hebrew.....

    Long before 1611......

    ? ? ....
  • Sour-Cream
    Sour-Cream Members Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Beenadumbass just shut the ? up.
  • zombie
    zombie Members Posts: 13,450 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2014
    Options
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    Judah Back wrote: »
    @beenwize yo ? ass ? iz Satan, he and his servants scared to speak of my ? by name cuz he been a dumb ? ass ? from the beginning . He an admitted ? ask me for proof


    Yo serpent ? likes ? and I got biblical proof, plzzzzzz ask me for it.


    @beenwize only a ? dammned ? would believe anything this ? beewize say, a 3rd grader could read those chapters and havr a better understanding than him

    why the ? haven't you answer the question yet? since page 5 you have not answered this question... lol
    You are a Hebrew Israelite so tell me if you been in America for hundreds of years being enslaved and oppressed why does it say that ? is rejoicing to destroy you? Rejoicing means happy. So tell me what was Satan doing while ? is rejoicing to destroy you?

    also to you @zombie

    Deuteronomy 28:63
    And it shall come to pass, that as the LORD rejoiced over you to do you good, and to multiply you; so the LORD will rejoice over you to destroy you, and to bring you to nought; and ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it

    I have no problem with deuteronomy 28:63 what the ? is your point?

    Answer the ? question dumb ? ... What was Satan doing while Yahweh was rejoicing to destroy? Hebrew Israelite says that scripture pertains to blacks in America for hundreds of years so if ? is rejoicing to destroy blacks for this long then what exactly is Satan doing? answer that.

    What the ? kind of stupid question are your asking me. deuteronomy 28 is about what will happen if israel goes astray it has nothing to do with the devil. It's just a punishment from ? and that is it.

    satan could careless what happens to anyone.

    ? if Satan is the theif, liar, and murderer then explain to me what he is doing while ? is "rejoicing" to destroy ppl? Is Satan also rejoicing? lol you can't answer that ? question and Hebrew Israelites use that scripture to say blacks were punished by Yahweh in America so therefore during the slave trade, lynchings, and everything else ? was rejoicing to destroy us? as a punishment? smh

    I am not a ? hewbrew isralite and do not agree with them on much. Satan is doing what satan always does and ? being happy to punish his children for their own good has nothing to do with satan,

    you are a sick ? just like your false ? .. so your ? is rejoicing lychings, enslaving ppl, and murdering ppl. look at the native Indians, and all these atrocities and your ? is rejoicing aka happy for that and you find that loving? would it not be good for those specific ppl that sinned then why is he rejoicing to destroy their innocent children hundreds of years later? that's not love. that's a sickness and you are sick too.

    Maybe you did not read where i said i am not a hebrew. Their doctrine of native americans really being A tribe of israel is not one that i share.

    it don't matter if you are Hebrew or not the question still remains. how is your ? rejoicing to destroy innocent decendents of ppl that sinned against him hundreds and thousands of years ago? Lol

    He's not you stupid ? the punishment israel got that was promised if they went astray happened already. ? off with linking the suffering of the native americans with deuto 28. i am not a hebrew so i don't subcribe to the belief that the sufferings of black and native people have anything to do with Punishments ? gave israel for doing wrong

    you dumb fool im not talking about native americans right now since you too ? to answer that question... when did deut 28 happen? show me some documented history outside the bible on when it happened and who it happened to?

    You ask me to give you proof of some thing that happened in the bible but you want the answers to come from outside it. but anyway in the bible ? told israel that if you stray i will punish you and he did just that.

    babylonian exile, persian ? and finally roman destruction.

    I ANSWERED YOU About the native americans ? they have nothing to do with israel ? the ? IS wrong with you people have answered you. Every ? question you bring i have answered.

    show me the historical facts of deut 28 happening in life without the BIble. If you say the BIble is history and you living in the world shouldn't it be easy to show me this happening in the world? lol

    look ? deuto 28 lists tons of punishments that ? would bring on israel if they ? up. i won't be going through all of them but deuto could very have happened when any one the major empires of earlier times conquered israel for example when rome destroyed israel for rebellion

    49 The Lord shall bring a nation against thee from far, from the end of the earth, as swift as the eagle flieth; a nation whose tongue thou shalt not understand;

    50 A nation of fierce countenance, which shall not regard the person of the old, nor shew favour to the young:

    51 And he shall eat the fruit of thy cattle, and the fruit of thy land, until thou be destroyed: which also shall not leave thee either corn, wine, or oil, or the increase of thy kine, or flocks of thy sheep, until he have destroyed thee.

    52 And he shall besiege thee in all thy gates, until thy high and fenced walls come down, wherein thou trustedst, throughout all thy land: and he shall besiege thee in all thy gates throughout all thy land, which the Lord thy ? hath given thee.

    53 And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters, which the Lord thy ? hath given thee, in the siege, and in the straitness, wherewith thine enemies shall distress thee:


    we KNOW from josephus THAT THE roman destruction of judea was so harsh that jews turned to cannabalism

    Show all this happening in history so that we can see who in reality was your ? rejoicing to destroy. was it the holucust that your ? was rejoicing about? was it the trans atlantic slave trade? was it the massacre of native Indians that your ? rejoiced about? what was it?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonian_captivity

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assyrian_captivity_of_Israel

    ? you wants dates in 67-70 ad the roman general titus crushes judea causing cannablism in some areas THE WHOLE POINT of deuto 28 is that it's a promise that if israel ? up they will be punished and every time they did ? punished them.
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    edited January 2014
    Options
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    We don't believe Jew..........

    You need more Hebrew..........


    we don't believe jew

    you need more glyphs....

    [img]https://scontent-b-ord.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/1486865_10202958550543409_1472897806_n.jpg[/img]

    The ? that made that gif is just as stupid as you.....

    Ramses was written in Hebrew.....

    Long before 1611......

    ? ? ....
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    This ? beenwize is dumb AF.........


    your mom is dumb as ? put my ? in that ? mouth...

    IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO SAY "RAMESES" WITHOUT FIRST DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!!! YOU HAVE "RAMESES" IN A 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE BUT THERE WAS NO CONSTRUCT FOR THE EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS UNTIL CHAMPOLLION DECIPHERS "THE ROSETTA STONE" IN THE LATE 1700'S PRODUCING HIS FINDINGS IN 1822!!!!! THE GLYPHS RA AND MES ARE BELOW!!!! THIS IS WHAT GIVES YOU "RAMESES!!!!" WHO WAS IN THE COURT OF KING JAMES IN 1611, OR ANYBODY BEFORE HIM, DECIPHERING EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS, TO GIVE YOU THE NAME "RAMESES???????" THESE GLYPS ARE WHAT MAKE UP THE NAME "RAMESES", AND THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY THE WORD WITHOUT DECIPHERING THOSE TWO GLYPS!!!!! THAT DON'T COME UNTIL CHAMPOLLION IN 1822!!!!! "RAMESES" WAS PLACED INTO THE BIBLE MUCH LATER TO GIVE THE BIBLE VALIDITY!!!!!! EVEN TAHARQA!!!! THE BIBLE SPELLS IT TIRHAKAH!!! THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY EITHER WITHOUT DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!! WHO DID IT IN 1611 OR BEFORE?????? YOU WOULD EVEN HAVE TO DESTROY THE MYTH OF CHAMPOLLION BEING THE AUTHOR OF THE LANGUAGE!!!!! DAMN!!!!! IT'S LIKE FINDING JAMES, JOHN & ELLIOTT IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE AFRICANS BEFORE THE COMING OF THE ENGLISH!!!! HOW?????


    & Ramses is nowhere in the bible.......
    .

    You just contradicted yourself...

    We don't believe Jew

    You need more glyphs

    and if that name appeared in the 1611 Bible then that would mean they had a name for to translate other glyphs you fool.
  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    zombie wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    Judah Back wrote: »
    @beenwize yo ? ass ? iz Satan, he and his servants scared to speak of my ? by name cuz he been a dumb ? ass ? from the beginning . He an admitted ? ask me for proof


    Yo serpent ? likes ? and I got biblical proof, plzzzzzz ask me for it.


    @beenwize only a ? dammned ? would believe anything this ? beewize say, a 3rd grader could read those chapters and havr a better understanding than him

    why the ? haven't you answer the question yet? since page 5 you have not answered this question... lol
    You are a Hebrew Israelite so tell me if you been in America for hundreds of years being enslaved and oppressed why does it say that ? is rejoicing to destroy you? Rejoicing means happy. So tell me what was Satan doing while ? is rejoicing to destroy you?

    also to you @zombie

    Deuteronomy 28:63
    And it shall come to pass, that as the LORD rejoiced over you to do you good, and to multiply you; so the LORD will rejoice over you to destroy you, and to bring you to nought; and ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou goest to possess it

    I have no problem with deuteronomy 28:63 what the ? is your point?

    Answer the ? question dumb ? ... What was Satan doing while Yahweh was rejoicing to destroy? Hebrew Israelite says that scripture pertains to blacks in America for hundreds of years so if ? is rejoicing to destroy blacks for this long then what exactly is Satan doing? answer that.

    What the ? kind of stupid question are your asking me. deuteronomy 28 is about what will happen if israel goes astray it has nothing to do with the devil. It's just a punishment from ? and that is it.

    satan could careless what happens to anyone.

    ? if Satan is the theif, liar, and murderer then explain to me what he is doing while ? is "rejoicing" to destroy ppl? Is Satan also rejoicing? lol you can't answer that ? question and Hebrew Israelites use that scripture to say blacks were punished by Yahweh in America so therefore during the slave trade, lynchings, and everything else ? was rejoicing to destroy us? as a punishment? smh

    I am not a ? hewbrew isralite and do not agree with them on much. Satan is doing what satan always does and ? being happy to punish his children for their own good has nothing to do with satan,

    you are a sick ? just like your false ? .. so your ? is rejoicing lychings, enslaving ppl, and murdering ppl. look at the native Indians, and all these atrocities and your ? is rejoicing aka happy for that and you find that loving? would it not be good for those specific ppl that sinned then why is he rejoicing to destroy their innocent children hundreds of years later? that's not love. that's a sickness and you are sick too.

    Maybe you did not read where i said i am not a hebrew. Their doctrine of native americans really being A tribe of israel is not one that i share.

    it don't matter if you are Hebrew or not the question still remains. how is your ? rejoicing to destroy innocent decendents of ppl that sinned against him hundreds and thousands of years ago? Lol

    He's not you stupid ? the punishment israel got that was promised if they went astray happened already. ? off with linking the suffering of the native americans with deuto 28. i am not a hebrew so i don't subcribe to the belief that the sufferings of black and native people have anything to do with Punishments ? gave israel for doing wrong

    you dumb fool im not talking about native americans right now since you too ? to answer that question... when did deut 28 happen? show me some documented history outside the bible on when it happened and who it happened to?

    You ask me to give you proof of some thing that happened in the bible but you want the answers to come from outside it. but anyway in the bible ? told israel that if you stray i will punish you and he did just that.

    babylonian exile, persian ? and finally roman destruction.

    I ANSWERED YOU About the native americans ? they have nothing to do with israel ? the ? IS wrong with you people have answered you. Every ? question you bring i have answered.

    show me the historical facts of deut 28 happening in life without the BIble. If you say the BIble is history and you living in the world shouldn't it be easy to show me this happening in the world? lol

    look ? deuto 28 lists tons of punishments that ? would bring on israel if they ? up. i won't be going through all of them but deuto could very have happened when any one the major empires of earlier times conquered israel for example when rome destroyed israel for rebellion

    49 The Lord shall bring a nation against thee from far, from the end of the earth, as swift as the eagle flieth; a nation whose tongue thou shalt not understand;

    50 A nation of fierce countenance, which shall not regard the person of the old, nor shew favour to the young:

    51 And he shall eat the fruit of thy cattle, and the fruit of thy land, until thou be destroyed: which also shall not leave thee either corn, wine, or oil, or the increase of thy kine, or flocks of thy sheep, until he have destroyed thee.

    52 And he shall besiege thee in all thy gates, until thy high and fenced walls come down, wherein thou trustedst, throughout all thy land: and he shall besiege thee in all thy gates throughout all thy land, which the Lord thy ? hath given thee.

    53 And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters, which the Lord thy ? hath given thee, in the siege, and in the straitness, wherewith thine enemies shall distress thee:


    we KNOW from josephus THAT THE roman destruction of judea was so harsh that jews turned to cannabalism

    Show all this happening in history so that we can see who in reality was your ? rejoicing to destroy. was it the holucust that your ? was rejoicing about? was it the trans atlantic slave trade? was it the massacre of native Indians that your ? rejoiced about? what was it?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylonian_captivity

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assyrian_captivity_of_Israel

    ? you wants dates in 67-70 ad the roman general titus crushes judea and causing cannablism in some areas THE WHOLE POINT of deuto 28 is that it's a promise that if israel ? up they will be punished and every time they did ? punished them.

    You a damn lie because if your ? ass had read Deut it says they would be enslaved with ships in Egypt...


    Deuteronomy 28:68
    And the LORD shall bring thee into Egypt again with ships, by the way whereof I spake unto thee, Thou shalt see it no more again: and there ye shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no man shall buy you.

    1. They did not go into Babylon by ships.
    2. They did not go into Assyria by ships.
    3. Neither is Egypt.

    Now Hebrew Israelites is a whole other story with their ideology, but you said you don't support their doctrine so your so called evidence is a big FAIL... come again.
  • bambu
    bambu Members Posts: 3,529 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited January 2014
    Options
    Mention of the Pharaoh Ramses is nowhere in the Bible.............

    It only mentions three by name

    Taharqa, Necho and Apries/Hophra......

    Not Ramses......

    Genesis 47

    bə·’e·reṣ
    בְּאֶ֣רֶץ
    in the land

    ra‘·mə·sês;
    רַעְמְסֵ֑ס
    of Rameses

    Strong's Concordance

    Raamses or Rameses: a city in Egypt
    Original Word: רַעַמְסֵס
    Part of Speech: Proper Name Location
    Transliteration: Raamses or Rameses
    Phonetic Spelling: (rah-mes-ace')
    Short Definition: Rameses

    I already sunned your stupid ass on this topic...........


    http://community.allhiphop.com/discussion/470269/the-historical-pharaohs-of-the-bible#latest


  • beenwize
    beenwize Members Posts: 2,024 ✭✭
    Options
    bambu wrote: »
    Mention of the Pharaoh Ramses is nowhere in the Bible.............

    It only mentions three by name

    Taharqa, Necho and Apries/Hophra......

    Not Ramses......

    Strong's Concordance

    Raamses or Rameses: a city in Egypt
    Original Word: רַעַמְסֵס
    Part of Speech: Proper Name Location
    Transliteration: Raamses or Rameses
    Phonetic Spelling: (rah-mes-ace')
    Short Definition: Rameses

    I already sunned your stupid ass on this topic...........


    http://community.allhiphop.com/discussion/470269/the-historical-pharaohs-of-the-bible#latest


    sit your ? ass down. I just made you look like a fool.
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    We don't believe Jew..........

    You need more Hebrew..........


    we don't believe jew

    you need more glyphs....

    [img]https://scontent-b-ord.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/1486865_10202958550543409_1472897806_n.jpg[/img]

    The ? that made that gif is just as stupid as you.....

    Ramses was written in Hebrew.....

    Long before 1611......

    ? ? ....
    bambu wrote: »
    beenwize wrote: »
    bambu wrote: »
    This ? beenwize is dumb AF.........


    your mom is dumb as ? put my ? in that ? mouth...

    IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO SAY "RAMESES" WITHOUT FIRST DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!!! YOU HAVE "RAMESES" IN A 1611 KING JAMES BIBLE BUT THERE WAS NO CONSTRUCT FOR THE EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS UNTIL CHAMPOLLION DECIPHERS "THE ROSETTA STONE" IN THE LATE 1700'S PRODUCING HIS FINDINGS IN 1822!!!!! THE GLYPHS RA AND MES ARE BELOW!!!! THIS IS WHAT GIVES YOU "RAMESES!!!!" WHO WAS IN THE COURT OF KING JAMES IN 1611, OR ANYBODY BEFORE HIM, DECIPHERING EGYPTIAN HIEROGLYPHS, TO GIVE YOU THE NAME "RAMESES???????" THESE GLYPS ARE WHAT MAKE UP THE NAME "RAMESES", AND THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY THE WORD WITHOUT DECIPHERING THOSE TWO GLYPS!!!!! THAT DON'T COME UNTIL CHAMPOLLION IN 1822!!!!! "RAMESES" WAS PLACED INTO THE BIBLE MUCH LATER TO GIVE THE BIBLE VALIDITY!!!!!! EVEN TAHARQA!!!! THE BIBLE SPELLS IT TIRHAKAH!!! THERE IS NO WAY TO SAY EITHER WITHOUT DECIPHERING THE GLYPHS IN HIS NAME!!!! WHO DID IT IN 1611 OR BEFORE?????? YOU WOULD EVEN HAVE TO DESTROY THE MYTH OF CHAMPOLLION BEING THE AUTHOR OF THE LANGUAGE!!!!! DAMN!!!!! IT'S LIKE FINDING JAMES, JOHN & ELLIOTT IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE AFRICANS BEFORE THE COMING OF THE ENGLISH!!!! HOW?????


    & Ramses is nowhere in the bible.......
    .

    You just contradicted yourself...

    We don't believe Jew

    You need more glyphs

    and if that name appeared in the 1611 Bible then that would mean they had a name for to translate other glyphs you fool.
This discussion has been closed.