U.N.S. The Education on Tommy Sotomayor.

Options
THIRDSUPREME
THIRDSUPREME Members Posts: 7,519 ✭✭✭✭✭
«134567

Comments

  • LEMZIMUS_RAMSEY
    LEMZIMUS_RAMSEY Members, Writer Posts: 17,670 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    He got some good points.
  • THIRDSUPREME
    THIRDSUPREME Members Posts: 7,519 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    lemzola wrote: »
    He got some good points.

    Yes he does, ? get mad when they aren't pulling the females they think they deserve. They slander women for their choices in men when the reality is....you get what you deserve. Period.

  • THIRDSUPREME
    THIRDSUPREME Members Posts: 7,519 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    DafuqYo wrote: »
    50yr old ? still talking about ? they ? ? ? mature at a shower rate than Men yo.

    Yeah...um I don't think fam is even pushing 50 lol.
  • a.mann
    a.mann Members Posts: 19,746 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2013
    Options
    Thomas Jerome Harris aka "Tommy Sotomayor" has a right to say whatever he likes,
    but I and many others see him for what he is, and what he is doing

    He chooses the "worse" of them
    and then uses his public platform to marginalize,demonize and denigrate black women as a whole for financial gain.

    My guess is he figured they would be the easiest demographic to target
    and he can make his living off their backs (sort to speak)

    "Tommy" had a pretty good run for awhile,
    But over the last several months, I've seen there have been more & more push back from the community against this type of demagoguery and many are actively rallying to put this rabid dog down
  • THIRDSUPREME
    THIRDSUPREME Members Posts: 7,519 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Tommy Sotomayor does tend to come off as a very emotionally wounded guy.

    He is... he is at war with black women. ? is hilarious.
  • THIRDSUPREME
    THIRDSUPREME Members Posts: 7,519 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    a.mann wrote: »
    Thomas Jerome Harris aka "Tommy Sotomayor" has a right to say whatever he likes,
    but I and many others see him for what he is, and what he is doing

    He chooses the "worse" of them
    and then uses his public platform to marginalize,demonize and denigrate black women as a whole for financial gain.

    My guess is he figured they would be the easiest demographic to target
    and he can make his living off their backs (sort to speak)

    "Tommy" had a pretty good run for awhile,
    But over the last several months, I've seen there have been more & more push back from the community against this type of demagoguery and many are actively rallying to put this rabid dog down

    Tommy has a huge fan base of emotionally scarred angry dudes.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihEpAuaoZ98&feature=youtube_gdata_player

    He aint goin nowhere... soon he'll be on satellite radio.
  • a.mann
    a.mann Members Posts: 19,746 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2013
    Options
    Tommy Sotomayor does tend to come off as a very emotionally wounded guy.

    He is... he is at war with black women. ? is hilarious.

    Some have come to the conclusion his agenda is bigger than that. And attacking black women was just to "soften" folks up for his next salvo

    Here's a interesting POV from a former listener:
    Why I no longer listen to Tommy Sotomayor...

    http://cinematicsymbolism.blogspot.com/2013/06/why-i-no-longer-listen-to-tommy_27.html

    Now, regardless of whatever you might think of Mr. Sotomayor, you can't deny the man has a certain charisma separating him from his peers. He's articulate, funny, quick-witted and exceedingly charming.

    Even his enemies seem to respect his message. I myself became enraptured in his rants about black women, and felt like, finally, a brotha really is taking black women to task about their hyper-belligerent attitudes.

    I reveled in his diatribes about black women being oversexed, obese, foul-mouthed, hair-hatted (euphemism for wearing weaves), condescending, abrasive, tactless, classless, being women who bare STDs and have predilections for producing children out of wedlock, being women who are power-drinkers and generally being women who lack any kind of verbal filter around Black men. But after a couple of months of tuning into his videos and radio shows faithfully, I began noticing a disturbing pattern...

    I began to hear him say things about Black people universally that made me take pause; and I noticed the only other kinds of videos he produced besides his 'rants', were the ones where he featured negative behavior in the Black diaspora. He'd have disturbing vids about Black youths killing law enforcement officers over 'Air Jordan' sneakers and Black people killing each other over pieces of chicken, etc. Then I began listening to his diatribes about Black people a little more closely, and what I heard was even more disturbing.


    There are other negative quotes he's made about his own people but you get the gist of his message. He then went on to extol the virtues of Rush Limbaugh and bragged about how Rush gave him his first job (?); now this is what Tommy claims and I can't confirm or deny this, but it's weird how this brotha seems to always defend overt or covert white bigots like Sarah Silverman and
  • a.mann
    a.mann Members Posts: 19,746 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2013
    Options
    Tommy has a huge fan base of emotionally scarred angry dudes.


    He aint goin nowhere... soon he'll be on satellite radio.

    It's cunning technique.

    Much like how Conservative media and radio hosts appeal to their TARGET demographic by homing in on their fear,paranoia, animosity, and bigotry toward President Obama by painting him as this omnipresent socialist,Marxist, Communists Tyrannical,Dictator of the Muslim Brotherhood. This of course is all code words for "Don't trust this ? ,because he is just like all the rest, and out to get you!"

    "Tommy" borrowed heavily from this tactic, by appealing to certain brothers (conscious AND subconscious) feelings of frustration,resentment, and rejection from dealing with black women.
    And yes some black chicks actually fed into this narrative also


  • THIRDSUPREME
    THIRDSUPREME Members Posts: 7,519 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    a.mann wrote: »
    Tommy has a huge fan base of emotionally scarred angry dudes.


    He aint goin nowhere... soon he'll be on satellite radio.

    It's cunning technique.

    Much like how Conservative media and radio hosts appeal to their TARGET demographic by homing in on their fear,paranoia, animosity, and bigotry toward President Obama by painting him as this omnipresent socialist,Marxist, Communists Tyrannical,Dictator of the Muslim Brotherhood. This of course is all code words for "Don't trust this ? ,because he is just like all the rest, and out to get you!"

    "Tommy" borrowed heavily from this tactic, by appealing to certain brothers (consciously AND subconsciously) feelings of frustration,resentment, and rejection dealing with black women.
    And yes some black chicks actually fed into this narrative also


    Exactly, Tommy's fan base goes beyond the black community.

    White folks have to be eating that ? up.
  • taeboo
    taeboo Members Posts: 4,669 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    a.mann wrote: »
    Tommy Sotomayor does tend to come off as a very emotionally wounded guy.

    He is... he is at war with black women. ? is hilarious.

    Some have come to the conclusion his agenda is bigger than that. And attacking black women was just to "soften" folks up for his next salvo

    Here's a interesting POV from a former listener:
    Why I no longer listen to Tommy Sotomayor...

    http://cinematicsymbolism.blogspot.com/2013/06/why-i-no-longer-listen-to-tommy_27.html

    Now, regardless of whatever you might think of Mr. Sotomayor, you can't deny the man has a certain charisma separating him from his peers. He's articulate, funny, quick-witted and exceedingly charming.

    Even his enemies seem to respect his message. I myself became enraptured in his rants about black women, and felt like, finally, a brotha really is taking black women to task about their hyper-belligerent attitudes.

    I reveled in his diatribes about black women being oversexed, obese, foul-mouthed, hair-hatted (euphemism for wearing weaves), condescending, abrasive, tactless, classless, being women who bare STDs and have predilections for producing children out of wedlock, being women who are power-drinkers and generally being women who lack any kind of verbal filter around Black men. But after a couple of months of tuning into his videos and radio shows faithfully, I began noticing a disturbing pattern...

    I began to hear him say things about Black people universally that made me take pause; and I noticed the only other kinds of videos he produced besides his 'rants', were the ones where he featured negative behavior in the Black diaspora. He'd have disturbing vids about Black youths killing law enforcement officers over 'Air Jordan' sneakers and Black people killing each other over pieces of chicken, etc. Then I began listening to his diatribes about Black people a little more closely, and what I heard was even more disturbing.


    There are other negative quotes he's made about his own people but you get the gist of his message. He then went on to extol the virtues of Rush Limbaugh and bragged about how Rush gave him his first job (?); now this is what Tommy claims and I can't confirm or deny this, but it's weird how this brotha seems to always defend overt or covert white bigots like Sarah Silverman and

    So this ignorant ? thought it was perfectly ok to bash black women all day, but talking about "all black people" aka black men turned him off of Sotomayor????

    MercedesRollingEyes.gif
  • 5th Letter
    5th Letter Members, Moderators, Writer Posts: 37,068 Regulator
    Options
    I can't take him serious simply because you can't pigeonhole an entire race of women. But sucka ? love his show because they were scorned by black women, so to them he's speaking the gospel.
  • a.mann
    a.mann Members Posts: 19,746 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    exactly!

    lol

    my only issue of his write up

    it's one thing to dog black women, but you crossing the line when you dog out black people as a whole?
    (meaning demonizing and denouncing black men as well as their female counter part)


    yeah, that's some ?
  • Meta_Conscious
    Meta_Conscious Members Posts: 26,227 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    So I was watching one of his vids this morning.
    He is over the top. But ppl should probably b more upset at the ratchets and animals he rails against.
    His emotional state ain't gonna stop certain folks from misbehaving.
  • taeboo
    taeboo Members Posts: 4,669 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    Stopitfive wrote: »
    So I was watching one of his vids this morning.
    He is over the top. But ppl should probably b more upset at the ratchets and animals he rails against.
    His emotional state ain't gonna stop certain folks from misbehaving.

    So I'm supposed to be mad at how the next person chooses to live their life?
  • Meta_Conscious
    Meta_Conscious Members Posts: 26,227 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2013
    Options
    taeboo wrote: »
    Stopitfive wrote: »
    So I was watching one of his vids this morning.
    He is over the top. But ppl should probably b more upset at the ratchets and animals he rails against.
    His emotional state ain't gonna stop certain folks from misbehaving.

    So I'm supposed to be mad at how the next person chooses to live their life?

    U don't have to b mad about anything.
    Continue to believe that public perception of your tribe has no effect on your offsprings opportunities in life. I don't care.
  • taeboo
    taeboo Members Posts: 4,669 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2013
    Options
    Stopitfive wrote: »
    taeboo wrote: »
    Stopitfive wrote: »
    So I was watching one of his vids this morning.
    He is over the top. But ppl should probably b more upset at the ratchets and animals he rails against.
    His emotional state ain't gonna stop certain folks from misbehaving.

    So I'm supposed to be mad at how the next person chooses to live their life?

    U don't have to b mad about anything.
    Continue to believe that public perception of your tribe has no effect on your offsprings opportunities in life. I don't care.

    Others have thought ill of us for centuries, me getting upset at a hoodrat isn't going to change that.

  • Meta_Conscious
    Meta_Conscious Members Posts: 26,227 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    taeboo wrote: »
    Stopitfive wrote: »
    taeboo wrote: »
    Stopitfive wrote: »
    So I was watching one of his vids this morning.
    He is over the top. But ppl should probably b more upset at the ratchets and animals he rails against.
    His emotional state ain't gonna stop certain folks from misbehaving.

    So I'm supposed to be mad at how the next person chooses to live their life?

    U don't have to b mad about anything.
    Continue to believe that public perception of your tribe has no effect on your offsprings opportunities in life. I don't care.

    Others have thought ill us of for centuries, me getting upset at a hoodrat isn't going to change that.

    That's part of the issue. Not holding members of your tribe accountable. Collective efficacy. Social disorganization. No wonder where we live is called the projects.
  • THOT PILGRIM
    THOT PILGRIM Members Posts: 2,262 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    So wait, what's this about Rush Limbaugh giving this guy a job?

    No shade, but in all of my dealings with other races, I have never heard a nonblack man ? on women of their own race as passionately and enthusiastically as black men do. NEVER.

    I've seen some posters on here call a nonblack woman a woman/lady and in the very same post refer to a black woman as a black ? . For shame.
  • Chi Snow
    Chi Snow Guests, Members, Writer, Content Producer Posts: 28,111 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    So wait, what's this about Rush Limbaugh giving this guy a job?

    No shade, but in all of my dealings with other races, I have never heard a nonblack man ? on women of their own race as passionately and enthusiastically as black men do. NEVER.

    I've seen some posters on here call a nonblack woman a woman/lady and in the very same post refer to a black woman as a black ? . For shame.
    Names or generalization?
  • a.mann
    a.mann Members Posts: 19,746 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    a.mann wrote: »

    "Tommy" borrowed heavily from this tactic, by appealing to certain brothers (conscious AND subconscious) feelings of frustration,resentment, and rejection dealing with black women.
    And yes some black chicks actually fed into this narrative also

    :-\"
  • Meta_Conscious
    Meta_Conscious Members Posts: 26,227 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    So wait, what's this about Rush Limbaugh giving this guy a job?

    No shade, but in all of my dealings with other races, I have never heard a nonblack man ? on women of their own race as passionately and enthusiastically as black men do. NEVER.

    I've seen some posters on here call a nonblack woman a woman/lady and in the very same post refer to a black woman as a black ? . For shame.

    Lol... U do know that white men in the United States created and reinforce the very patriarchy that controls women's earning potential and reproductive rights or nah?
    Lol...
    Talk is cheap.
  • Rozetta5tone
    Rozetta5tone Members Posts: 4,506 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Options
    I can't buy into what that ? says.

    ? more emotional than Drake.

    Have a few good points peppered into the ? ? fits and you too can be a pompous idiot.