Yay or Nay: Circumcision.
Options
Steevie_00
Members Posts: 124
Girls, what do you prefer?
Do you think this pracice is slowly playing out?
What are the pros and cons of not having a circumcised ? ?
Would you circumsize your children?
(I'm for it)
Do you think this pracice is slowly playing out?
What are the pros and cons of not having a circumcised ? ?
Would you circumsize your children?
(I'm for it)
Comments
-
yay x 100000000000000000000000000
people
PLEASE i beg you PLEASE circumsize ur kid
PLEASE!! -
You are a chick right?
-
The Prime Minister wrote: »You are a chick right?
yes!................ -
lmao...Mike Epps said "just cuz a ? got money dont mean he got his ? cut right...girl he got money but he got blanket lint...!!!"
-
Steevie_00 wrote: »yes!................
Great! In that case, yeah, chicks dig a long and smooth shaft with a clean head.
Though I have met chicks who are into the pig in the blanket. -
Snidley admitted to a serious ? before :td
-
Will not do it to my son, if a ? is that superficial to not mess with him then that's one chick who ain't prize material anyways. It's about practicing good hygene, for all the chicks saying ewwww, how about we bind your feet or circumsize yall.
-
lol
i always wondered if that extra skin tickles the spot *shrugs* -
Will not do it to my son, if a ? is that superficial to not mess with him then that's one chick who ain't prize material anyways. It's about practicing good hygene, for all the chicks saying ewwww, how about we bind your feet or circumsize yall.
-
so i guess that means ur not circumsized lol
Yep, never had a problem with it, my ? rolls back like Walmart discount. You should read up on female circumsizion though, i guarantee you would look at this issue differently. -
Will not do it to my son, if a ? is that superficial to not mess with him then that's one chick who ain't prize material anyways. It's about practicing good hygene, for all the chicks saying ewwww, how about we bind your feet or circumsize yall.
^^^^^
This -
And ? you Steevie for making this thread.......
Keep it between me and you ? . Between me and you. -
my son shall be circimcized. Nobody wants sone filthy anteater.
-
Hell yeah, wouldn't have it any other way.
-
Yep, never had a problem with it, my ? rolls back like Walmart discount. You should read up on female circumsizion though, i guarantee you would look at this issue differently.
LMFAO@ the walmart quote.
I just prefer to see the head of the ? i guess.
Female circumcision isterrible. I've seen it first hand when I was back in africa. They do it on girls who are like 6 years old plus, with no anesthetic and with a ? blade.
They use anesthetic on baby boys. (Well at least in the UK they do) -
Tha Killer wrote: »And ? you Steevie for making this thread.......
Keep it between me and you ? . Between me and you.
Why are you showing yourself up?
I never mentioned your name son.
Well done. LOL. -
Steevie_00 wrote: »Why are you showing yourself up?
I never mentioned your name son.
Well done. LOL.
Hahaha. I just want to let it be known I do NOT support this thread or your reasoning behind creating it.
Please and thank you, cuntmuffin. -
Steevie_00 wrote: »LMFAO@ the walmart quote.
I just prefer to see the head of the ? i guess.
Female circumcision isterrible. I've seen it first hand when I was back in africa. They do it on girls who are like 6 years old plus, with no anesthetic and with a ? blade.
They use anesthetic on baby boys. (Well at least in the UK they do)
The thing is, as soon as i get rocked up you can't tell im not. Some peoples ? is a little more extreme! -
I think it's getting phased out here. My oldest son was born at 3:36am and circumsized at 7:30am. Now the hospitals won't even do it. My sis had her baby a few weeks ago and she had to pay $300 bucks at the doctor's office.
I know a few people who recently had sons and didn't get them circumcised because the doctors are saying it isn't medically necessary.
-
Yep, never had a problem with it, my ? rolls back like Walmart discount. You should read up on female circumsizion though, i guarantee you would look at this issue differently.
well glad u never had a prob with ur uncut ? . but dont be mad cuz other people prefer a circumsized ? lol.
and ummm sorry but what a ? ignorant comparison you're making. they are completely different.
like steevie said circumsisions are done on INFANTS using anasthetic for religious and/or medical purposes. uncut ? are more likely to be ? , and more likely to get cancer and STDs, infections, etc. thats why people do it, not just for aesthetic reasons.
meanwhile while female circumsisions are also known as MUTILATION and are done to girls using no anasthetic. the purpose for this is to eliminate any pleasure a woman can get from sex. females need their ? to protect their ? . men's ? serves no purpose and again has higher risks medically which is why its been commonly removed for centuries. maybe YOU should read up on it. -
nthngis4vr& alwyzisalie wrote: »I think it's getting phased out here. My oldest son was born at 3:36am and circumsized at 7:30am. Now the hospitals won't even do it. My sis had her baby a few weeks ago and she had to pay $300 bucks at the doctor's office.
I know a few people who recently had sons and didn't get them circumcised because the doctors are saying it isn't medically necessary.
neither is cutting your toenails or washing your hair. does that mean I shouldnt do it either? -
My kid wont be circumcized I aint. Funny thing is most chicks dont know unless I tell them even after they have given me head
-
princetavern wrote: »snidley admitted to a serious ? before :td
:dead: ................ -
well glad u never had a prob with ur uncut ? . but dont be mad cuz other people prefer a circumsized ? lol.
and ummm sorry but what a ? ignorant comparison you're making. they are completely different.
like steevie said circumsisions are done on INFANTS using anasthetic for religious and/or medical purposes. uncut ? are more likely to be ? , and more likely to get cancer and STDs, infections, etc. thats why people do it, not just for aesthetic reasons.
meanwhile while female circumsisions are also known as MUTILATION and are done to girls using no anasthetic. the purpose for this is to eliminate any pleasure a woman can get from sex. females need their ? to protect their ? . men's ? serves no purpose and again has higher risks medically which is why its been commonly removed for centuries. maybe YOU should read up on it.
Show me a consenus of doctors who agree with that i would agree. That is a myth that has been going around forever, it's never been proven factual. -
My kid wont be circumcized I aint. Funny thing is most chicks dont know unless I tell them even after they have given me head
WTF!!!!!!! LMFAO! I literally LOL'd
How can you not know you're sucking an uncut ? ... them ? must be virgins or retards
There's a considerable amount of excess skin and you can definitely tell/see/feel the difference