Wrestlemania 32
Options
Comments
-
another match that didnt get talked about that was good, was the diva 6-WOman tag match..
and yo...i really can't stand what the wwe has done to Naomi, home girl should of been champ and can wrestle her ass off! that spot with the multiple kicks to Natalya..that ish was tough!!! -
I'm a write my review of the event a little later on because I think I might have been harsh on some of the matches.
-
Black_Samson wrote: »Told yall it was 5 years too soon for reigns.
not at all -
? was ? trash and Roman Reigns still sucks... ? Vince McMahon
-
What got me mad was my ? HHH got in the best shape he's been in since 03 just for 1 spear to put him down smh
-
Would be dope if Vince is ? that HHH couldn't get the job done at Mania and gives Shane control of Raw anyway. Doubt it'll happen though
-
It begins
[img]https://scontent-sjc2-1.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/t31.0-8/fr/cp0/e15/q65/12967343_833446780093562_1790239034426749983_o.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9[/img]
-
Still a lot of ppl and broke the mania record
-
It begins
[img]https://scontent-sjc2-1.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/t31.0-8/fr/cp0/e15/q65/12967343_833446780093562_1790239034426749983_o.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9[/img]
More talking points. I wonder if they will give an actual name this time. Probably not right?
I can't believe we have to go through this every single ? year... -
they wanted us to believe the first ever womens champion was crowned yesterday
the first ever undisputed champion was crowned...twice
remember cena vs rock - once twice in a lifetime?
wwe lies to our face. you dont think they lie about attendance? -
Reigns haunts Smokey in his dreams
-
Smokey Tha Bandit wrote: »? was ? trash and Roman Reigns still sucks... ? Vince McMahon
Honestly it doesn't matter if he gets booed unjust or not. He's not what the universe wants and WWE will never get their head out of their ? to do the right thing. No matter who it is.
Vince tells the fans what they like..and the more the espn's, and fans buy the product the more Vince will cont. to book the way he likes. -
Already Home_17 wrote: »they wanted us to believe the first ever womens champion was crowned yesterday
the first ever undisputed champion was crowned...twice
remember cena vs rock - once twice in a lifetime?
wwe lies to our face. you dont think they lie about attendance?
I'm sure 90% of the first 5 rows were plants, ? looked like professional clappers draped in Cena merch, also their attendance numbers are always home cooked where they count the stage crew, Pyro guys, the wrestlers themselves etc -
Already Home_17 wrote: »they wanted us to believe the first ever womens champion was crowned yesterday
the first ever undisputed champion was crowned...twice
remember cena vs rock - once twice in a lifetime?
wwe lies to our face. you dont think they lie about attendance?
What can proven and what can't be? Seems there is evidence of those others isn't it?
When has Melzter provided any evidence? -
OK, so like I stated previously, I really haven't followed wrestling, so, how come nobody likes that Roman guy?
Just lack of charisma right? -
Turfaholic wrote: »OK, so like I stated previously, I really haven't followed wrestling, so, how come nobody likes that Roman guy?
Just lack of charisma right?
Be prepared for insane and stupid responses -
Already Home_17 wrote: »they wanted us to believe the first ever womens champion was crowned yesterday
the first ever undisputed champion was crowned...twice
remember cena vs rock - once twice in a lifetime?
wwe lies to our face. you dont think they lie about attendance?
What can proven and what can't be? Seems there is evidence of those others isn't it?
When has Melzter provided any evidence?
he interviewed a former wwe promoter (name given in the following video) and he acknowledged WM3's attendance was inflated
so either meltzer lied about an interview that didnt happen with somebody who didnt exist and pulled a number out of his ass to discredit wwe.....or the wwe lied about said wrestlemania's attendance
im going with the latter -
Turfaholic wrote: »OK, so like I stated previously, I really haven't followed wrestling, so, how come nobody likes that Roman guy?
Just lack of charisma right?
He sucks hella ? and only fruity ? and ? hoes appreciate that ? and he's a ? ass cena knock off that cant work atleast cena could work -
It begins
[img]https://scontent-sjc2-1.? .fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/t31.0-8/fr/cp0/e15/q65/12967343_833446780093562_1790239034426749983_o.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9[/img]
Like I said yesterday whether the attendance number hit 84,000+ (real number) or 101+(inflated) the record for WrestleMania III was broken either way. -
Already Home_17 wrote: »Already Home_17 wrote: »they wanted us to believe the first ever womens champion was crowned yesterday
the first ever undisputed champion was crowned...twice
remember cena vs rock - once twice in a lifetime?
wwe lies to our face. you dont think they lie about attendance?
What can proven and what can't be? Seems there is evidence of those others isn't it?
When has Melzter provided any evidence?
he interviewed a former wwe promoter (name given in the following video) and he acknowledged WM3's attendance was inflated
so either meltzer lied about an interview that didnt happen with somebody who didnt exist and pulled a number out of his ass to discredit wwe.....or the wwe lied about said wrestlemania's attendance
im going with the latter
No documents? That's the important thing here. I don't know whether that person is real or not, WM 3 was almost 30 years ago.
But if there was a document...proof of this conversation with said promoter of said event in question.
-
Turfaholic wrote: »OK, so like I stated previously, I really haven't followed wrestling, so, how come nobody likes that Roman guy?
Just lack of charisma right?
legit reasons:
not charismatic
not the best talker
not the best wrestler
his finisher is a punch
hasnt been booked well
silly reasons:
he kept the shield's theme
he wears a vest
he has long hair -
Also Solomonster believes everything Melzter says, like so many do, he didn't do any research himself.
-
Already Home_17 wrote: »Already Home_17 wrote: »they wanted us to believe the first ever womens champion was crowned yesterday
the first ever undisputed champion was crowned...twice
remember cena vs rock - once twice in a lifetime?
wwe lies to our face. you dont think they lie about attendance?
What can proven and what can't be? Seems there is evidence of those others isn't it?
When has Melzter provided any evidence?
he interviewed a former wwe promoter (name given in the following video) and he acknowledged WM3's attendance was inflated
so either meltzer lied about an interview that didnt happen with somebody who didnt exist and pulled a number out of his ass to discredit wwe.....or the wwe lied about said wrestlemania's attendance
im going with the latter
No documents? That's the important thing here. I don't know whether that person is real or not, WM 3 was almost 30 years ago.
But if there was a document...proof of this conversation with said promoter of said event in question.
do you have proof the number is legit?
or are you solely going by what wwe says? -
Turfaholic wrote: »OK, so like I stated previously, I really haven't followed wrestling, so, how come nobody likes that Roman guy?
Just lack of charisma right?
When people found out he was gonna be the next top guy, they automatically rebelled. Reigns was in a successful group called the shield with dean ambrose and seth Rollins. When they broke up, Ambrose and Rollins were forced to change their gimmicks, while reigns kept the shied gear and music. Ambrose and Rollins were successful in their gimmicks, with Rollins becoming world champ before getting injured and Ambrose being one of, if not the most popular face in wwe. Reigns was booked well at one point but wwe is showing his bad traits such as his mic work, who's he's been feuding with, etc. I like reigns but he's gotta change his gimmick if he wants to be taken seriously, if that can still happen -
Already Home_17 wrote: »Already Home_17 wrote: »Already Home_17 wrote: »they wanted us to believe the first ever womens champion was crowned yesterday
the first ever undisputed champion was crowned...twice
remember cena vs rock - once twice in a lifetime?
wwe lies to our face. you dont think they lie about attendance?
What can proven and what can't be? Seems there is evidence of those others isn't it?
When has Melzter provided any evidence?
he interviewed a former wwe promoter (name given in the following video) and he acknowledged WM3's attendance was inflated
so either meltzer lied about an interview that didnt happen with somebody who didnt exist and pulled a number out of his ass to discredit wwe.....or the wwe lied about said wrestlemania's attendance
im going with the latter
No documents? That's the important thing here. I don't know whether that person is real or not, WM 3 was almost 30 years ago.
But if there was a document...proof of this conversation with said promoter of said event in question.
do you have proof the number is legit?
or are you solely going by what wwe says?
No but I'm not saying whether it is or isn't either. It doesn't matter to me either way, I'm asking for someone to corroborate a story put out by a reporter.
