So certain females are mad @ Jesse Williams for divorcing his wife & then supposedly upgrading to...
Options
Comments
-
Like Water wrote: »
I don't understand what's ugly about her? -
Ajackson17 wrote: »Like Water wrote: »
I don't understand what's ugly about her?
? , would you date her based on her looks? -
Like Water wrote: »Ajackson17 wrote: »Like Water wrote: »
I don't understand what's ugly about her?
? , would you date her based on her looks?
Yeah, she has niger-congo features and so do I. Natural hair and everything. She ain't ugly but a woman who is taking care of her husband and children. -
Ajackson17 wrote: »Like Water wrote: »
I don't understand what's ugly about her?
She ain't ugly, but she ain't particularly attractive either. However, it doesn't really matter what we think. The dude married her, so she obviously wasn't ugly to him. But at the end of the day, people are only as faithful as their options. So if he was with her before he got famous, he may not have the same opinion about her after a whole new world opened up. Then again, she may have been the one that changed. There is no point in us speculating what happened between them, and as I said before, none of us should care about ? like this. -
Ajackson17 wrote: »Like Water wrote: »Ajackson17 wrote: »Like Water wrote: »
I don't understand what's ugly about her?
? , would you date her based on her looks?
Yeah, she has niger-congo features and so do I. Natural hair and everything. She ain't ugly but a woman who is taking care of her husband and children.
Welp... proof positive that there's someone for everyone. Good for you, champ.
Based on what I have, and what I have had in my life, as far as women are concerned, she'd be a major downgrade for me. She just ain't the business to me.
-
The Lonious Monk wrote: »Ajackson17 wrote: »Like Water wrote: »
I don't understand what's ugly about her?
She ain't ugly, but she ain't particularly attractive either. However, it doesn't really matter what we think. The dude married her, so she obviously wasn't ugly to him. But at the end of the day, people are only as faithful as their options. So if he was with her before he got famous, he may not have the same opinion about her after a whole new world opened up. Then again, she may have been the one that changed. There is no point in us speculating what happened between them, and as I said before, none of us should care about ? like this.
I agree.
Funny thing though some ? will gas a basic flat body white or latina and say a basic black woman ain't ? unless she got a phat ass. -
Like Water wrote: »Ajackson17 wrote: »Like Water wrote: »
I don't understand what's ugly about her?
? , would you date her based on her looks?
She is an average looking woman. She isn't ugly at all. -
Idgaf what their ethnicity is, if you put his ex wife and Minka Kelly in a line up and told me to pick one. 10/10 times I'm picking Minka Kelly.
I get it in Jesse's case but I'm smart enough to see past the ? .
She looks better w/o makeup than Minka looks without makeup. Dead serious. -
Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »All these Titan graphs and yall forget this one important point you can't control who you fall in love with
That sounds pretty but it's ? .
I've never fallen in love with someone without investing my time and effort. You can control your investments.
You can't put time and effort into somebody you pick and all of the sudden ? create love it doesn't work like that the ? literally just happens
Only beginning effort you put is actually somehow meeting that person
Nobody hey I'ma work with this person until I fall in love ? don't ever happens that way
So a good looking man approached me at the grocery yesterday, and I had two options.
1) exchange numbers and begin a friendship, which could in turn, develop into an intimate relationship with this man. Could even develop into genuine love.
2) tell him I'm married and drive away, investing nothing into the man and completely avoiding the possibility of falling in love with someone.
That could also be applied to a workplace situation.
You don't fall in love overnight, you choose to open yourself to the possibility. -
Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »All these Titan graphs and yall forget this one important point you can't control who you fall in love with
That sounds pretty but it's ? .
I've never fallen in love with someone without investing my time and effort. You can control your investments.
You can't put time and effort into somebody you pick and all of the sudden ? create love it doesn't work like that the ? literally just happens
Only beginning effort you put is actually somehow meeting that person
Nobody hey I'ma work with this person until I fall in love ? don't ever happens that way
So a good looking man approached me at the grocery yesterday, and I had two options.
1) exchange numbers and begin a friendship, which could in turn, develop into an intimate relationship with this man. Could even develop into genuine love.
2) tell him I'm married and drive away, investing nothing into the man and completely avoiding the possibility of falling in love with someone.
That could also be applied to a workplace situation.
You don't fall in love overnight, you choose to open yourself to the possibility.
did this really happen or you were just illustrating a story?
-
It really happened. The whole being married excuse makes things so much easier.
-
And of course black women are going to feel betrayed. He's a good looking guy whose words led black women to believe he was truly down for them. They thought he was theirs, so to speak.
ok....not attacking you per se.
but what the fukk?
see, I have a problem with this.
it's says so many things.
so if he was a duck. would that make it easier to detach from him cuz they ain't really like him anyway and she can have him?
so...in other words, the message can be recieved better because of his looks.
thats why these hoes is confused an lost. always ready to claim what's makes them look good even if it's only surface.
no depth to these shallow hoed except they ? . an that's only because their eyes tell them hes ok because he's fine.
smdh -
-
Lmaooo...
aight where's Ob this makes me sad
that boy been mentally gone for a while now
I know that look lol....his mind made up he just waiting to execute -
"Simply bc you're an animal acitivist doesnt mean you can't wear fur"
If he said you couldn't be with a white woman this would apply but he didn't say that in his speech.
The two aren't related at all but in Jesse's case I get it. The outrage for this is ? tho. Harry Belafonte, Sydney Poitier, etc. And it doesn't discredit what they did for the black community or civil rights either.
The argument that who you date negates your work is one that was never made.
But a high profile problack celebrity/activist looks a certain way not dating a black person.
Why do you think this scene was a running joke?
[img]https://stephaniegadlin.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/im-gonna-? -you-sucka-kalinga-wife-eve-plumb-jan-brady-clarence-william-iii-review.jpg?w=912&h=519[/img]
? who you want but the optics control perception -
Aint nobody approach kat
-
2stepz_ahead wrote: »And of course black women are going to feel betrayed. He's a good looking guy whose words led black women to believe he was truly down for them. They thought he was theirs, so to speak.
ok....not attacking you per se.
but what the fukk?
see, I gave a problem with this.
it's says so many things.
so if he was a duck. would that make it easier to detach from him cuz they ain't really like him anyway and she can have him?
so...in other words, the message can be recieved better because of his looks.
thats why these hoes is confused an lost. always ready to claim what's makes them look good even if it's only surface.
no depth to these shallow hoed except they ? . an that's only because their eyes tell them hes ok because he's fine.
smdh
Oh yeah I've been noticing that for a couple of years now especially on social media. You can tell if a chick is choosing or about to choose when she is liking every status that you make lol. That's why I made the justify vs crucify term in my previous post. That's how a lot get played for the ookie doke at the end -
Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »Ghostdenithegawd wrote: »All these Titan graphs and yall forget this one important point you can't control who you fall in love with
That sounds pretty but it's ? .
I've never fallen in love with someone without investing my time and effort. You can control your investments.
You can't put time and effort into somebody you pick and all of the sudden ? create love it doesn't work like that the ? literally just happens
Only beginning effort you put is actually somehow meeting that person
Nobody hey I'ma work with this person until I fall in love ? don't ever happens that way
So a good looking man approached me at the grocery yesterday, and I had two options.
1) exchange numbers and begin a friendship, which could in turn, develop into an intimate relationship with this man. Could even develop into genuine love.
2) tell him I'm married and drive away, investing nothing into the man and completely avoiding the possibility of falling in love with someone.
That could also be applied to a workplace situation.
You don't fall in love overnight, you choose to open yourself to the possibility.
The groundwork for two people falling in love is there before y'all was even thought offline swimming ya pops sack
I always felt like you got about 5 people you can be out right compatible with enough to fall in love with
It's whether or not y'all make the right choices/provisions to not ? it up but 99% of us make "people" mistakes -
"Simply bc you're an animal acitivist doesnt mean you can't wear fur"
If he said you couldn't be with a white woman this would apply but he didn't say that in his speech.
The two aren't related at all but in Jesse's case I get it. The outrage for this is ? tho. Harry Belafonte, Sydney Poitier, etc. And it doesn't discredit what they did for the black community or civil rights either.
The argument that who you date negates your work is one that was never made.
But a high profile problack celebrity/activist looks a certain way not dating a black person.
Why do you think this scene was a running joke?
[img]https://stephaniegadlin.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/im-gonna-? -you-sucka-kalinga-wife-eve-plumb-jan-brady-clarence-william-iii-review.jpg?w=912&h=519[/img]
? who you want but the optics control perception
Dude that's a movie, it's a work of fiction that's a caricature of a stereotype.
Perception most of the time isn't real.
To be pro black means to be anti white supremacy not anti-white. I get it but it's not his obligation to ? a certain type of woman for the sake of looking a certain way. If he said it's wrong to date white girls y'all would have a case but y'all are projecting your own ideals and perceptions on him and who he chooses to sleep with isn't his responsibility to y'all. There are ? civil rights activists what they do in the bedroom has no bearing on what they preach outside the bedroom.
The outrage is ? . You've got posts in the Minka Kelly threads saying you'd ? her and choose her. Does that make you any less sensitive to the plight of black people ? Hell no. If you left you're girlfriend and Minka threw you the box, you telling me you'd say "hey sorry I only ? black girls" ? Let's cut the ? fam. And worst of all we don't even KNOW for sure if he's actually dating or ? her SMMFH.
I think marrying white supports white supremacy though. Marrying white in America is a byproduct of years of white washing and the devaluing of Blacks and our culture.
-
"Simply bc you're an animal acitivist doesnt mean you can't wear fur"
If he said you couldn't be with a white woman this would apply but he didn't say that in his speech.
The two aren't related at all but in Jesse's case I get it. The outrage for this is ? tho. Harry Belafonte, Sydney Poitier, etc. And it doesn't discredit what they did for the black community or civil rights either.
The argument that who you date negates your work is one that was never made.
But a high profile problack celebrity/activist looks a certain way not dating a black person.
Why do you think this scene was a running joke?
[img]https://stephaniegadlin.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/im-gonna-? -you-sucka-kalinga-wife-eve-plumb-jan-brady-clarence-william-iii-review.jpg?w=912&h=519[/img]
? who you want but the optics control perception
Dude that's a movie, it's a work of fiction that's a caricature of a stereotype.
Perception most of the time isn't real.
To be pro black means to be anti white supremacy not anti-white. I get it but it's not his obligation to ? a certain type of woman for the sake of looking a certain way. If he said it's wrong to date white girls y'all would have a case but y'all are projecting your own ideals and perceptions on him and who he chooses to sleep with isn't his responsibility to y'all. There are ? civil rights activists what they do in the bedroom has no bearing on what they preach outside the bedroom.
The outrage is ? . You've got posts in the Minka Kelly threads saying you'd ? her and choose her. Does that make you any less sensitive to the plight of black people ? Hell no. If you left you're girlfriend and Minka threw you the box, you telling me you'd say "hey sorry I only ? black girls" ? Let's cut the ? fam. And worst of all we don't even KNOW for sure if he's actually dating or ? her SMMFH.
I think marrying white supports white supremacy though. Marrying white in America is a byproduct of years of white washing and the devaluing of Blacks and our culture.
If you start a family outside of your race, your grandchildren will eventually be non-black if they don't 'come back home', for all intents and purposes. Ronda Rousey's grandfather was black. No one sees her as black.
But that's only if you care about preserving black. Some people see everyone as family and don't draw lines at race at all. They believe we're all the same anyway, so it doesn't matter. -
So what if you got black kids and mixed kids???
-
"Simply bc you're an animal acitivist doesnt mean you can't wear fur"
If he said you couldn't be with a white woman this would apply but he didn't say that in his speech.
The two aren't related at all but in Jesse's case I get it. The outrage for this is ? tho. Harry Belafonte, Sydney Poitier, etc. And it doesn't discredit what they did for the black community or civil rights either.
The argument that who you date negates your work is one that was never made.
But a high profile problack celebrity/activist looks a certain way not dating a black person.
Y'all ? keep saying this ? not realizing that your ? contradicting yourselves.
If who ever they are dating doesn't negates their work then there shouldn't be a "but" -
-
"Simply bc you're an animal acitivist doesnt mean you can't wear fur"
If he said you couldn't be with a white woman this would apply but he didn't say that in his speech.
The two aren't related at all but in Jesse's case I get it. The outrage for this is ? tho. Harry Belafonte, Sydney Poitier, etc. And it doesn't discredit what they did for the black community or civil rights either.
The argument that who you date negates your work is one that was never made.
But a high profile problack celebrity/activist looks a certain way not dating a black person.
Why do you think this scene was a running joke?
[img]https://stephaniegadlin.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/im-gonna-? -you-sucka-kalinga-wife-eve-plumb-jan-brady-clarence-william-iii-review.jpg?w=912&h=519[/img]
? who you want but the optics control perception
Dude that's a movie, it's a work of fiction that's a caricature of a stereotype.
Perception most of the time isn't real.
To be pro black means to be anti white supremacy not anti-white. I get it but it's not his obligation to ? a certain type of woman for the sake of looking a certain way. If he said it's wrong to date white girls y'all would have a case but y'all are projecting your own ideals and perceptions on him and who he chooses to sleep with isn't his responsibility to y'all. There are ? civil rights activists what they do in the bedroom has no bearing on what they preach outside the bedroom.
The outrage is ? . You've got posts in the Minka Kelly threads saying you'd ? her and choose her. Does that make you any less sensitive to the plight of black people ? Hell no. If you left you're girlfriend and Minka threw you the box, you telling me you'd say "hey sorry I only ? black girls" ? Let's cut the ? fam. And worst of all we don't even KNOW for sure if he's actually dating or ? her SMMFH.
I think marrying white supports white supremacy though. Marrying white in America is a byproduct of years of white washing and the devaluing of Blacks and our culture.
If you start a family outside of your race, your grandchildren will eventually be non-black if they don't 'come back home', for all intents and purposes. Ronda Rousey's grandfather was black. No one sees her as black.
But that's only if you care about preserving black. Some people see everyone as family and don't draw lines at race at all. They believe we're all the same anyway, so it doesn't matter.
It was her great-grandfather(Dr. Alfred E. Waddell) but your point was made.
Thats some ? I didn't know, don't like Rousey either so it makes sense I don't know nothing about her -
So what if you got black kids and mixed kids???
Doesn't matter, several generations of your kids and grandchildren starting families with non-blacks will result in your future generations being non-black, essentially.
Again, this is only a concern for those who care about racial preservation.
