Hollywood Sex Abuse Scandal Thread - Harvey , Kevin, Andy etc
Options
Comments
-
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »All this outrage and its a ? happily and willfully busting it open on a cast couch right now!!
That ? ain't going to ever end. People are always going to be willing to trade sex for something that they want.
Only thing ? up about it is when these people prey on kids.
A grown person who CHOOSES to ? and suck for movie roles made a conscious decision that movie fame and money is worth more to them than their dignity.
Why the ? should I care more about their dignity than they do?
Im not trying to defend or condemn the women. And im not saying life is fair for everyone.
But you missing the point bruh. Hollywood has a culture where it is expected that women gotta ? and suck for a role. Almost all of them do it, and they understand and accept it.
That is the issue. Instead of being merit based and based on talent and skilled, all of that becomes secondary and it comes down too does she want it enough to suck this ? .
That culture shouldnt exist in any aspect of life. That culture does exist though, everywhere, even outside of hollywood, and not just gender based, its also race and religion based. Basically, if you arent a white chrisrian male, you have faced this in some form or another.
To put the blame solely on women for this completely missed the point.
Where did I put anything solely on women?
The bold is the only thing you said that is worth a damn. They understand it and accept it.
So like I said they are making the conscious decision to suck and ? . They don't have to but are willing to in order to get what they want.
A hoe suck and ? for money, they sucking and ? for movie roles and money.
I ain't crying for grown people who willing to put a price on ? they shouldn't.
You are and I have no problems with that. Just some ? I ain't going to do.
They need to live with their choices IMO. That ? ain't a forced ? situation. Its more a quid pro quo from what I'm seeing.
Why is this not looked as a old man tricking off on a young ? ?
Old wants to ? a young ? offers money, clothes, cars, purses or movie roles.
Young ? wants money, clothes, cars, purses and to act in movies.
Old man makes offer to provide all that ? and the young ? accepts knowing what comes with it.
Why should I care?
? ain't nothing but a different form of tricking.
some of these women say they were touched, propositioned or put into an inappropriate position without their consent.... and, for good reason, fearful of being blackballed if they told
it's no different then being sexually harassed on ur job
and the women who did turn down his advances or report him were either dismissed or treated as outcasts
everyone should care because allowing these executives to get away with this only empowers/emboldens them and others within the industry who may also prey on young ppl, children who want fame and money
I don't know what reading comprehension problems some of yall have just because a person doesn't just fall in line with the outrage train of thought some of the media want people to have.
I'll repeat it again.
I don't care or have empathy for any man or woman who consciously chose to ? and suck for a movie role.
I'll repeat again.
I do have empathy and care about those people who were forced, ? or kids who have been violated.
As usual you taking ? I never said and just replying and talking to be talking.
Either address what I say or don't reply based off what you assuming I'm saying. If I didn't type it then don't attribute it to me.
lol
per usual
you made an irrelevant, dismissive commentAll this outrage and its a ? happily and willfully busting it open on a cast couch right now!!
and i like others responded accordingly
*shrugs*
No I spoke on something specific. Which is exactly what you quoted.
You like you always do speak about ? that I never commented on.
I spoke specifically about the people who make a conscious decision to ? and suck for a movie role.
You and those others chose to speak on some ? I never talked about to try and make a point regarding my comment.
That ? is dumb as ? and you continually do it. Which I always say you talking to be talking and typing just to be typing.
Like I said either address what I typed and only what I typed or don't quote my ? to bring up some ? that I never said and act like I'm saying some ? I never said.
That's sucka ? .
yes you spoke specifically about the people who make a conscious decision to ? and suck for a movie role
but that is not why ppl are outraged and bashing weinstein as ur comment suggests
if that was not ur intent ...cool... ur bad
otherwise i don't see the relevance
*shrugs*
End of discussion.
yea
ur bad bruh
its ok lol -
so will yall support his movies while playing rkelly in the background?
-
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »All this outrage and its a ? happily and willfully busting it open on a cast couch right now!!
That ? ain't going to ever end. People are always going to be willing to trade sex for something that they want.
Only thing ? up about it is when these people prey on kids.
A grown person who CHOOSES to ? and suck for movie roles made a conscious decision that movie fame and money is worth more to them than their dignity.
Why the ? should I care more about their dignity than they do?
Im not trying to defend or condemn the women. And im not saying life is fair for everyone.
But you missing the point bruh. Hollywood has a culture where it is expected that women gotta ? and suck for a role. Almost all of them do it, and they understand and accept it.
That is the issue. Instead of being merit based and based on talent and skilled, all of that becomes secondary and it comes down too does she want it enough to suck this ? .
That culture shouldnt exist in any aspect of life. That culture does exist though, everywhere, even outside of hollywood, and not just gender based, its also race and religion based. Basically, if you arent a white chrisrian male, you have faced this in some form or another.
To put the blame solely on women for this completely missed the point.
Where did I put anything solely on women?
The bold is the only thing you said that is worth a damn. They understand it and accept it.
So like I said they are making the conscious decision to suck and ? . They don't have to but are willing to in order to get what they want.
A hoe suck and ? for money, they sucking and ? for movie roles and money.
I ain't crying for grown people who willing to put a price on ? they shouldn't.
You are and I have no problems with that. Just some ? I ain't going to do.
They need to live with their choices IMO. That ? ain't a forced ? situation. Its more a quid pro quo from what I'm seeing.
Why is this not looked as a old man tricking off on a young ? ?
Old wants to ? a young ? offers money, clothes, cars, purses or movie roles.
Young ? wants money, clothes, cars, purses and to act in movies.
Old man makes offer to provide all that ? and the young ? accepts knowing what comes with it.
Why should I care?
? ain't nothing but a different form of tricking.
some of these women say they were touched, propositioned or put into an inappropriate position without their consent.... and, for good reason, fearful of being blackballed if they told
it's no different then being sexually harassed on ur job
and the women who did turn down his advances or report him were either dismissed or treated as outcasts
everyone should care because allowing these executives to get away with this only empowers/emboldens them and others within the industry who may also prey on young ppl, children who want fame and money
I don't know what reading comprehension problems some of yall have just because a person doesn't just fall in line with the outrage train of thought some of the media want people to have.
I'll repeat it again.
I don't care or have empathy for any man or woman who consciously chose to ? and suck for a movie role.
I'll repeat again.
I do have empathy and care about those people who were forced, ? or kids who have been violated.
As usual you taking ? I never said and just replying and talking to be talking.
Either address what I say or don't reply based off what you assuming I'm saying. If I didn't type it then don't attribute it to me.
lol
per usual
you made an irrelevant, dismissive commentAll this outrage and its a ? happily and willfully busting it open on a cast couch right now!!
and i like others responded accordingly
*shrugs*
No I spoke on something specific. Which is exactly what you quoted.
You like you always do speak about ? that I never commented on.
I spoke specifically about the people who make a conscious decision to ? and suck for a movie role.
You and those others chose to speak on some ? I never talked about to try and make a point regarding my comment.
That ? is dumb as ? and you continually do it. Which I always say you talking to be talking and typing just to be typing.
Like I said either address what I typed and only what I typed or don't quote my ? to bring up some ? that I never said and act like I'm saying some ? I never said.
That's sucka ? .
yes you spoke specifically about the people who make a conscious decision to ? and suck for a movie role
but that is not why ppl are outraged and bashing weinstein as ur comment suggests
if that was not ur intent ...cool... ur bad
otherwise i don't see the relevance
*shrugs*
End of discussion.
yea
ur bad bruh
its ok lol
-
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »All this outrage and its a ? happily and willfully busting it open on a cast couch right now!!
That ? ain't going to ever end. People are always going to be willing to trade sex for something that they want.
Only thing ? up about it is when these people prey on kids.
A grown person who CHOOSES to ? and suck for movie roles made a conscious decision that movie fame and money is worth more to them than their dignity.
Why the ? should I care more about their dignity than they do?
Im not trying to defend or condemn the women. And im not saying life is fair for everyone.
But you missing the point bruh. Hollywood has a culture where it is expected that women gotta ? and suck for a role. Almost all of them do it, and they understand and accept it.
That is the issue. Instead of being merit based and based on talent and skilled, all of that becomes secondary and it comes down too does she want it enough to suck this ? .
That culture shouldnt exist in any aspect of life. That culture does exist though, everywhere, even outside of hollywood, and not just gender based, its also race and religion based. Basically, if you arent a white chrisrian male, you have faced this in some form or another.
To put the blame solely on women for this completely missed the point.
Where did I put anything solely on women?
The bold is the only thing you said that is worth a damn. They understand it and accept it.
So like I said they are making the conscious decision to suck and ? . They don't have to but are willing to in order to get what they want.
A hoe suck and ? for money, they sucking and ? for movie roles and money.
I ain't crying for grown people who willing to put a price on ? they shouldn't.
You are and I have no problems with that. Just some ? I ain't going to do.
They need to live with their choices IMO. That ? ain't a forced ? situation. Its more a quid pro quo from what I'm seeing.
Why is this not looked as a old man tricking off on a young ? ?
Old wants to ? a young ? offers money, clothes, cars, purses or movie roles.
Young ? wants money, clothes, cars, purses and to act in movies.
Old man makes offer to provide all that ? and the young ? accepts knowing what comes with it.
Why should I care?
? ain't nothing but a different form of tricking.
some of these women say they were touched, propositioned or put into an inappropriate position without their consent.... and, for good reason, fearful of being blackballed if they told
it's no different then being sexually harassed on ur job
and the women who did turn down his advances or report him were either dismissed or treated as outcasts
everyone should care because allowing these executives to get away with this only empowers/emboldens them and others within the industry who may also prey on young ppl, children who want fame and money
I don't know what reading comprehension problems some of yall have just because a person doesn't just fall in line with the outrage train of thought some of the media want people to have.
I'll repeat it again.
I don't care or have empathy for any man or woman who consciously chose to ? and suck for a movie role.
I'll repeat again.
I do have empathy and care about those people who were forced, ? or kids who have been violated.
As usual you taking ? I never said and just replying and talking to be talking.
Either address what I say or don't reply based off what you assuming I'm saying. If I didn't type it then don't attribute it to me.
lol
per usual
you made an irrelevant, dismissive commentAll this outrage and its a ? happily and willfully busting it open on a cast couch right now!!
and i like others responded accordingly
*shrugs*
No I spoke on something specific. Which is exactly what you quoted.
You like you always do speak about ? that I never commented on.
I spoke specifically about the people who make a conscious decision to ? and suck for a movie role.
You and those others chose to speak on some ? I never talked about to try and make a point regarding my comment.
That ? is dumb as ? and you continually do it. Which I always say you talking to be talking and typing just to be typing.
Like I said either address what I typed and only what I typed or don't quote my ? to bring up some ? that I never said and act like I'm saying some ? I never said.
That's sucka ? .
yes you spoke specifically about the people who make a conscious decision to ? and suck for a movie role
but that is not why ppl are outraged and bashing weinstein as ur comment suggests
if that was not ur intent ...cool... ur bad
otherwise i don't see the relevance
*shrugs*
End of discussion.
yea
ur bad bruh
its ok lol
just trying to help u out
i only do it ? i care luv -
Kate Beckinsale is a trash actress she needs to get the ? on with that talk about hurtin my career...
-
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »All this outrage and its a ? happily and willfully busting it open on a cast couch right now!!
That ? ain't going to ever end. People are always going to be willing to trade sex for something that they want.
Only thing ? up about it is when these people prey on kids.
A grown person who CHOOSES to ? and suck for movie roles made a conscious decision that movie fame and money is worth more to them than their dignity.
Why the ? should I care more about their dignity than they do?
Im not trying to defend or condemn the women. And im not saying life is fair for everyone.
But you missing the point bruh. Hollywood has a culture where it is expected that women gotta ? and suck for a role. Almost all of them do it, and they understand and accept it.
That is the issue. Instead of being merit based and based on talent and skilled, all of that becomes secondary and it comes down too does she want it enough to suck this ? .
That culture shouldnt exist in any aspect of life. That culture does exist though, everywhere, even outside of hollywood, and not just gender based, its also race and religion based. Basically, if you arent a white chrisrian male, you have faced this in some form or another.
To put the blame solely on women for this completely missed the point.
Where did I put anything solely on women?
The bold is the only thing you said that is worth a damn. They understand it and accept it.
So like I said they are making the conscious decision to suck and ? . They don't have to but are willing to in order to get what they want.
A hoe suck and ? for money, they sucking and ? for movie roles and money.
I ain't crying for grown people who willing to put a price on ? they shouldn't.
You are and I have no problems with that. Just some ? I ain't going to do.
They need to live with their choices IMO. That ? ain't a forced ? situation. Its more a quid pro quo from what I'm seeing.
Why is this not looked as a old man tricking off on a young ? ?
Old wants to ? a young ? offers money, clothes, cars, purses or movie roles.
Young ? wants money, clothes, cars, purses and to act in movies.
Old man makes offer to provide all that ? and the young ? accepts knowing what comes with it.
Why should I care?
? ain't nothing but a different form of tricking.
some of these women say they were touched, propositioned or put into an inappropriate position without their consent.... and, for good reason, fearful of being blackballed if they told
it's no different then being sexually harassed on ur job
and the women who did turn down his advances or report him were either dismissed or treated as outcasts
everyone should care because allowing these executives to get away with this only empowers/emboldens them and others within the industry who may also prey on young ppl, children who want fame and money
I don't know what reading comprehension problems some of yall have just because a person doesn't just fall in line with the outrage train of thought some of the media want people to have.
I'll repeat it again.
I don't care or have empathy for any man or woman who consciously chose to ? and suck for a movie role.
I'll repeat again.
I do have empathy and care about those people who were forced, ? or kids who have been violated.
As usual you taking ? I never said and just replying and talking to be talking.
Either address what I say or don't reply based off what you assuming I'm saying. If I didn't type it then don't attribute it to me.
lol
per usual
you made an irrelevant, dismissive commentAll this outrage and its a ? happily and willfully busting it open on a cast couch right now!!
and i like others responded accordingly
*shrugs*
No I spoke on something specific. Which is exactly what you quoted.
You like you always do speak about ? that I never commented on.
I spoke specifically about the people who make a conscious decision to ? and suck for a movie role.
You and those others chose to speak on some ? I never talked about to try and make a point regarding my comment.
That ? is dumb as ? and you continually do it. Which I always say you talking to be talking and typing just to be typing.
Like I said either address what I typed and only what I typed or don't quote my ? to bring up some ? that I never said and act like I'm saying some ? I never said.
That's sucka ? .
yes you spoke specifically about the people who make a conscious decision to ? and suck for a movie role
but that is not why ppl are outraged and bashing weinstein as ur comment suggests
if that was not ur intent ...cool... ur bad
otherwise i don't see the relevance
*shrugs*
End of discussion.
yea
ur bad bruh
its ok lol
just trying to help u out
i only do it ? i care luv
-
fortyacres wrote: »Kate Beckinsale is a trash actress she needs to get the ? on with that talk about hurtin my career...
lol
no love for underworld? -
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »All this outrage and its a ? happily and willfully busting it open on a cast couch right now!!
That ? ain't going to ever end. People are always going to be willing to trade sex for something that they want.
Only thing ? up about it is when these people prey on kids.
A grown person who CHOOSES to ? and suck for movie roles made a conscious decision that movie fame and money is worth more to them than their dignity.
Why the ? should I care more about their dignity than they do?
Im not trying to defend or condemn the women. And im not saying life is fair for everyone.
But you missing the point bruh. Hollywood has a culture where it is expected that women gotta ? and suck for a role. Almost all of them do it, and they understand and accept it.
That is the issue. Instead of being merit based and based on talent and skilled, all of that becomes secondary and it comes down too does she want it enough to suck this ? .
That culture shouldnt exist in any aspect of life. That culture does exist though, everywhere, even outside of hollywood, and not just gender based, its also race and religion based. Basically, if you arent a white chrisrian male, you have faced this in some form or another.
To put the blame solely on women for this completely missed the point.
Where did I put anything solely on women?
The bold is the only thing you said that is worth a damn. They understand it and accept it.
So like I said they are making the conscious decision to suck and ? . They don't have to but are willing to in order to get what they want.
A hoe suck and ? for money, they sucking and ? for movie roles and money.
I ain't crying for grown people who willing to put a price on ? they shouldn't.
You are and I have no problems with that. Just some ? I ain't going to do.
They need to live with their choices IMO. That ? ain't a forced ? situation. Its more a quid pro quo from what I'm seeing.
Why is this not looked as a old man tricking off on a young ? ?
Old wants to ? a young ? offers money, clothes, cars, purses or movie roles.
Young ? wants money, clothes, cars, purses and to act in movies.
Old man makes offer to provide all that ? and the young ? accepts knowing what comes with it.
Why should I care?
? ain't nothing but a different form of tricking.
some of these women say they were touched, propositioned or put into an inappropriate position without their consent.... and, for good reason, fearful of being blackballed if they told
it's no different then being sexually harassed on ur job
and the women who did turn down his advances or report him were either dismissed or treated as outcasts
everyone should care because allowing these executives to get away with this only empowers/emboldens them and others within the industry who may also prey on young ppl, children who want fame and money
I don't know what reading comprehension problems some of yall have just because a person doesn't just fall in line with the outrage train of thought some of the media want people to have.
I'll repeat it again.
I don't care or have empathy for any man or woman who consciously chose to ? and suck for a movie role.
I'll repeat again.
I do have empathy and care about those people who were forced, ? or kids who have been violated.
As usual you taking ? I never said and just replying and talking to be talking.
Either address what I say or don't reply based off what you assuming I'm saying. If I didn't type it then don't attribute it to me.
lol
per usual
you made an irrelevant, dismissive commentAll this outrage and its a ? happily and willfully busting it open on a cast couch right now!!
and i like others responded accordingly
*shrugs*
No I spoke on something specific. Which is exactly what you quoted.
You like you always do speak about ? that I never commented on.
I spoke specifically about the people who make a conscious decision to ? and suck for a movie role.
You and those others chose to speak on some ? I never talked about to try and make a point regarding my comment.
That ? is dumb as ? and you continually do it. Which I always say you talking to be talking and typing just to be typing.
Like I said either address what I typed and only what I typed or don't quote my ? to bring up some ? that I never said and act like I'm saying some ? I never said.
That's sucka ? .
yes you spoke specifically about the people who make a conscious decision to ? and suck for a movie role
but that is not why ppl are outraged and bashing weinstein as ur comment suggests
if that was not ur intent ...cool... ur bad
otherwise i don't see the relevance
*shrugs*
End of discussion.
yea
ur bad bruh
its ok lol
just trying to help u out
i only do it ? i care luv
how's ur day going?
working? -
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »fortyacres wrote: »Kate Beckinsale is a trash actress she needs to get the ? on with that talk about hurtin my career...
lol
no love for underworld?
no -
MsSouthern wrote: »
Oh no, being mary jane will be all gone! -
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »fortyacres wrote: »Kate Beckinsale is a trash actress she needs to get the ? on with that talk about hurtin my career...
lol
no love for underworld?
That entire series is wack af -
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »fortyacres wrote: »Kate Beckinsale is a trash actress she needs to get the ? on with that talk about hurtin my career...
lol
no love for underworld?
That entire series is wack af
i haven't watched the first movie since high school but i thought it was dope
-
You also think titangraphs are cool
-
Never seen E.T. post
Thats understandable for u
You were prolly like 30 when it came out -
You also think titangraphs are cool
lol
when appropriate
i like to read and write *shrugs*
and it makes the day go by faster -
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »
Having a job will do that also... -
MsSouthern wrote: »northside7 wrote: »
You can add the never-ending story to the list.
Your childhood must have sucked
Who doesn't like he Never Ending Story ????
FALKOORRRE!!!!
Nah. My childhood was Live af.
Give me karate kid, Tmnt (goat), and transformers, over those three movies. -
I remember one summer at daycare they had us watched those three movies smdh. ? boring as ? .
That ? was cruel and unusual punishment.
-
fortyacres wrote: »Kate Beckinsale is a trash actress she needs to get the ? on with that talk about hurtin my career...
i'll smashed tho she look like a freak who will keep it on the low i bet she got smashed by harvey and he never called her back now she mad lol -
-
Back on topic:
Weinstiens wife is being let off the hook...she knew -
Back on topic:
Weinstiens wife is being let off the hook...she knew
They all knew what was up. -
She says she was invited to the Savoy Hotel for a meeting with Weinstein but was told to go to his room upon arrival.
“He opened the door in his bathrobe. I was incredibly naive and young and it did not cross my mind that this older, unattractive man would expect me to have any sexual interest in him," she wrote. "After declining alcohol and announcing that I had school in the morning I left, uneasy but unscathed.”
The plot thickens as she describes an occasion years later in which Weinstein asked her if he had tried anything when they first met.
“I realized he couldn’t remember if he had assaulted me or not,” she wrote.
Beckinsale says that she rejected him professionally for many years, which often resulted in verbal tirades from Weinstein. She claims he would scream at her, call her a “c--t” and make threats. He allegedly would “laughingly” tell people that she loved to say “no” to him
-
Lurkristocrat wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »
Having a job will do that also...
try having a job with a lot of downtime -
Back on topic:
Weinstiens wife is being let off the hook...she knew
Of course she did
And now she's all in shock and awe.
Like she didn't know her husband is a creep
