In a PR blitz before his trial, Bill Cosby blames racism for sexual assault claims
Options
Comments
-
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »There might be some racism behind the difference between how he is being treated vs some others, but even then, that might be a stretch.
At this point, dude is pretty much accused of being the Michael Jordan of ? , so it stands to reason he'd get more press than the other violators. There is also the fact that he actually admitted to buying Quaaludes for the purpose of sex with women.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/07/us/bill-cosby-quaaludes-sexual-assault-allegations/
Sometimes there is no conspiracy to take a ? down. Sometimes ? are just guilty.
y'know there was a time when blacks and whites couldnt marry.. let alone be together..
point bein we cant judge and condemn a man for somethin he did in a different time and era..
? willingly took them ? back in the day not to fall asleep but for the euphoric feeling...
EVERYONE WAS DOIN IT..
u dont go to no ? drug party get ? on and 50yrs later say because u were under the influence u was ? ..
? get all the way the ? outta here.
u got ? !
did this man cheat on his wife??
sure..
did he ? these ? ?? by today's standards yes.. seein as if u so much as look at a ? and think nasty thoughts witout her consent its ? ..
but it wasnt ? 50yrs ago orelse they wouldve hung his black ass..
Would you say the same thing about the "reformed" racists from the 50 years ago?
And from my understanding Quaaludes ain't like alcohol where a chick may be doing what she really wants to do anyway while under the influences. Quaaludes knock people out. So I'm not sure how you figure that a dude giving drugs to a chick and then having sex with that chick while she's unconscious or close to it is not ? .
He never had sex with unconscious women nor did he drug any woman. They both took drugs and had consensual sex.
how do you know this for sure? lol
so it's not possible that he's lying to protect himself?
So none of those women admit to willfully taking drugs? u really believe that? -
Hoes will be hoes, Bill ain't ? a single one of these ? .
-
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »There might be some racism behind the difference between how he is being treated vs some others, but even then, that might be a stretch.
At this point, dude is pretty much accused of being the Michael Jordan of ? , so it stands to reason he'd get more press than the other violators. There is also the fact that he actually admitted to buying Quaaludes for the purpose of sex with women.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/07/us/bill-cosby-quaaludes-sexual-assault-allegations/
Sometimes there is no conspiracy to take a ? down. Sometimes ? are just guilty.
y'know there was a time when blacks and whites couldnt marry.. let alone be together..
point bein we cant judge and condemn a man for somethin he did in a different time and era..
? willingly took them ? back in the day not to fall asleep but for the euphoric feeling...
EVERYONE WAS DOIN IT..
u dont go to no ? drug party get ? on and 50yrs later say because u were under the influence u was ? ..
? get all the way the ? outta here.
u got ? !
did this man cheat on his wife??
sure..
did he ? these ? ?? by today's standards yes.. seein as if u so much as look at a ? and think nasty thoughts witout her consent its ? ..
but it wasnt ? 50yrs ago orelse they wouldve hung his black ass..
Would you say the same thing about the "reformed" racists from the 50 years ago?
And from my understanding Quaaludes ain't like alcohol where a chick may be doing what she really wants to do anyway while under the influences. Quaaludes knock people out. So I'm not sure how you figure that a dude giving drugs to a chick and then having sex with that chick while she's unconscious or close to it is not ? .
they mixed the drug wit ? ..
people saw the wolf of wallstreet movie and took it as it made u a zombie based off that scene wit the lambo..
but negate the fact they said in the very same movie if u RESIST the urge to GO TO SLEEP u experience the best high..
iunno.. tho..
i wasnt there and i dont do drugs..
but those were the drug OF CHOICE back in the day and u had to be somebody to have them so ofcourse ? go flock to the stars..
Bill bein one of them..
? knew what they was doin..
to this day ? ? for fire weed..
so miss me wit the ? ..
a white ? clamin a black man ? her back then?? and white men okay wit it!?
? please..
This is where this story falls apart for me,there is no way in hell a black man is ? all of these white women back in the 1960's -1980's and is getting away with it America.
they tryin to use today's standard of ? ..
u know when the feminist took over..
a ? can go out wit a ? get ? and high wit a ? and wake up.. sober up and claim ? ..
ONLY the male in the situation is held accountable..
thats in todays day..
back then a ? didnt want to get ? she didnt sneak to a ? 's house in the middle of the night while his wife is sleepin..
THATS why they had to wait 50yrs to claim ? .
but let someone drive in that same state of ? or highness and ? folk.... all of a sudden decision making and accountability comeinto play when they lock u up.... Its all ?
what?
so if you get caught slipping and pass out ? with a female should you not be able to press charges if you wake up to an empty house?
u missed my whole point which is this country likes to pick and choose when to hold people accoiuntble for their decisions when drinking... exhibit A woman and man drink together.... Womans inhibitions go down she ? him... He hits and never calls again. She says he rped me because I was ? and did not know what I was doing..... Man gets locked up for ? although he was drinking just like her... SO I guess only her drunkness matters and superceeds his lol Lets say that same woman drove home after ? him and hit someone.... Police breathalize her and she fails.... guess what she goin to jail with no ? given. U see how ? the logic is where the same woman who drank has no responsibility for ? the man but she does have responsibility for driving.....
yea
i don't agree that men or anyone should be penalized for having ? sex if both parties was down
with cosby though some of his accusers claim he drugged them without their consent and did things to them under the influence, when they were unconscious ....that's a different story -
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »There might be some racism behind the difference between how he is being treated vs some others, but even then, that might be a stretch.
At this point, dude is pretty much accused of being the Michael Jordan of ? , so it stands to reason he'd get more press than the other violators. There is also the fact that he actually admitted to buying Quaaludes for the purpose of sex with women.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/07/us/bill-cosby-quaaludes-sexual-assault-allegations/
Sometimes there is no conspiracy to take a ? down. Sometimes ? are just guilty.
y'know there was a time when blacks and whites couldnt marry.. let alone be together..
point bein we cant judge and condemn a man for somethin he did in a different time and era..
? willingly took them ? back in the day not to fall asleep but for the euphoric feeling...
EVERYONE WAS DOIN IT..
u dont go to no ? drug party get ? on and 50yrs later say because u were under the influence u was ? ..
? get all the way the ? outta here.
u got ? !
did this man cheat on his wife??
sure..
did he ? these ? ?? by today's standards yes.. seein as if u so much as look at a ? and think nasty thoughts witout her consent its ? ..
but it wasnt ? 50yrs ago orelse they wouldve hung his black ass..
Would you say the same thing about the "reformed" racists from the 50 years ago?
And from my understanding Quaaludes ain't like alcohol where a chick may be doing what she really wants to do anyway while under the influences. Quaaludes knock people out. So I'm not sure how you figure that a dude giving drugs to a chick and then having sex with that chick while she's unconscious or close to it is not ? .
they mixed the drug wit ? ..
people saw the wolf of wallstreet movie and took it as it made u a zombie based off that scene wit the lambo..
but negate the fact they said in the very same movie if u RESIST the urge to GO TO SLEEP u experience the best high..
iunno.. tho..
i wasnt there and i dont do drugs..
but those were the drug OF CHOICE back in the day and u had to be somebody to have them so ofcourse ? go flock to the stars..
Bill bein one of them..
? knew what they was doin..
to this day ? ? for fire weed..
so miss me wit the ? ..
a white ? clamin a black man ? her back then?? and white men okay wit it!?
? please..
This is where this story falls apart for me,there is no way in hell a black man is ? all of these white women back in the 1960's -1980's and is getting away with it America.
they tryin to use today's standard of ? ..
u know when the feminist took over..
a ? can go out wit a ? get ? and high wit a ? and wake up.. sober up and claim ? ..
ONLY the male in the situation is held accountable..
thats in todays day..
back then a ? didnt want to get ? she didnt sneak to a ? 's house in the middle of the night while his wife is sleepin..
THATS why they had to wait 50yrs to claim ? .
but let someone drive in that same state of ? or highness and ? folk.... all of a sudden decision making and accountability comeinto play when they lock u up.... Its all ?
what?
so if you get caught slipping and pass out ? with a female should you not be able to press charges if you wake up to an empty house?
u missed my whole point which is this country likes to pick and choose when to hold people accoiuntble for their decisions when drinking... exhibit A woman and man drink together.... Womans inhibitions go down she ? him... He hits and never calls again. She says he rped me because I was ? and did not know what I was doing..... Man gets locked up for ? although he was drinking just like her... SO I guess only her drunkness matters and superceeds his lol Lets say that same woman drove home after ? him and hit someone.... Police breathalize her and she fails.... guess what she goin to jail with no ? given. U see how ? the logic is where the same woman who drank has no responsibility for ? the man but she does have responsibility for driving.....
yea
i don't agree that men or anyone should be penalized for having ? sex if both parties was down
with cosby though some of his accusers claim he drugged them without their consent and did things to them under the influence, when they were unconscious ....that's a different story
and yet they remember everything as if it was yesturday!!?
even though they were passed out!!?
? shut the ? up!! -
Why are men defending someone who already admitted to doing it in a "sealed " statement
? Cosby -
MarcusGarvey wrote: »Why are men defending someone who already admitted to doing it in a "sealed " statement
? Cosby -
BOSSExcellence wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The same ? that lectured ? for years and gave us the ? ? pound cake speech?
im the same ? that be lecturing my cousins and lil homies..
ur point??
u got kids?? probably not..
good!
but i got custody of one who jus turned 16 and another thats 17 and i be on these ? head about they grades and behavior in school..
maybe i should jus shut the ? up cause who am i to talk right??
If you start ? hoes...yes you should have a coke and a smile and shut the ? up
Look BossHuxtable this aint ending well for ya daddy...it just aint
cause he ? them cause they said so?!
.
No cause he said so
https://www.google.com/amp/variety.com/2015/biz/news/bill-cosby-admits-to-drugging-women-for-sex-report-1201534649/amp/ -
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »There might be some racism behind the difference between how he is being treated vs some others, but even then, that might be a stretch.
At this point, dude is pretty much accused of being the Michael Jordan of ? , so it stands to reason he'd get more press than the other violators. There is also the fact that he actually admitted to buying Quaaludes for the purpose of sex with women.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/07/us/bill-cosby-quaaludes-sexual-assault-allegations/
Sometimes there is no conspiracy to take a ? down. Sometimes ? are just guilty.
y'know there was a time when blacks and whites couldnt marry.. let alone be together..
point bein we cant judge and condemn a man for somethin he did in a different time and era..
? willingly took them ? back in the day not to fall asleep but for the euphoric feeling...
EVERYONE WAS DOIN IT..
u dont go to no ? drug party get ? on and 50yrs later say because u were under the influence u was ? ..
? get all the way the ? outta here.
u got ? !
did this man cheat on his wife??
sure..
did he ? these ? ?? by today's standards yes.. seein as if u so much as look at a ? and think nasty thoughts witout her consent its ? ..
but it wasnt ? 50yrs ago orelse they wouldve hung his black ass..
Would you say the same thing about the "reformed" racists from the 50 years ago?
And from my understanding Quaaludes ain't like alcohol where a chick may be doing what she really wants to do anyway while under the influences. Quaaludes knock people out. So I'm not sure how you figure that a dude giving drugs to a chick and then having sex with that chick while she's unconscious or close to it is not ? .
He never had sex with unconscious women nor did he drug any woman. They both took drugs and had consensual sex.
how do you know this for sure? lol
so it's not possible that he's lying to protect himself?
so it's not possible that they were lying? -
BOSSExcellence wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »There might be some racism behind the difference between how he is being treated vs some others, but even then, that might be a stretch.
At this point, dude is pretty much accused of being the Michael Jordan of ? , so it stands to reason he'd get more press than the other violators. There is also the fact that he actually admitted to buying Quaaludes for the purpose of sex with women.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/07/us/bill-cosby-quaaludes-sexual-assault-allegations/
Sometimes there is no conspiracy to take a ? down. Sometimes ? are just guilty.
y'know there was a time when blacks and whites couldnt marry.. let alone be together..
point bein we cant judge and condemn a man for somethin he did in a different time and era..
? willingly took them ? back in the day not to fall asleep but for the euphoric feeling...
EVERYONE WAS DOIN IT..
u dont go to no ? drug party get ? on and 50yrs later say because u were under the influence u was ? ..
? get all the way the ? outta here.
u got ? !
did this man cheat on his wife??
sure..
did he ? these ? ?? by today's standards yes.. seein as if u so much as look at a ? and think nasty thoughts witout her consent its ? ..
but it wasnt ? 50yrs ago orelse they wouldve hung his black ass..
Would you say the same thing about the "reformed" racists from the 50 years ago?
And from my understanding Quaaludes ain't like alcohol where a chick may be doing what she really wants to do anyway while under the influences. Quaaludes knock people out. So I'm not sure how you figure that a dude giving drugs to a chick and then having sex with that chick while she's unconscious or close to it is not ? .
they mixed the drug wit ? ..
people saw the wolf of wallstreet movie and took it as it made u a zombie based off that scene wit the lambo..
but negate the fact they said in the very same movie if u RESIST the urge to GO TO SLEEP u experience the best high..
iunno.. tho..
i wasnt there and i dont do drugs..
but those were the drug OF CHOICE back in the day and u had to be somebody to have them so ofcourse ? go flock to the stars..
Bill bein one of them..
? knew what they was doin..
to this day ? ? for fire weed..
so miss me wit the ? ..
a white ? clamin a black man ? her back then?? and white men okay wit it!?
? please..
This is where this story falls apart for me,there is no way in hell a black man is ? all of these white women back in the 1960's -1980's and is getting away with it America.
they tryin to use today's standard of ? ..
u know when the feminist took over..
a ? can go out wit a ? get ? and high wit a ? and wake up.. sober up and claim ? ..
ONLY the male in the situation is held accountable..
thats in todays day..
back then a ? didnt want to get ? she didnt sneak to a ? 's house in the middle of the night while his wife is sleepin..
THATS why they had to wait 50yrs to claim ? .
but let someone drive in that same state of ? or highness and ? folk.... all of a sudden decision making and accountability comeinto play when they lock u up.... Its all ?
what?
so if you get caught slipping and pass out ? with a female should you not be able to press charges if you wake up to an empty house?
u missed my whole point which is this country likes to pick and choose when to hold people accoiuntble for their decisions when drinking... exhibit A woman and man drink together.... Womans inhibitions go down she ? him... He hits and never calls again. She says he rped me because I was ? and did not know what I was doing..... Man gets locked up for ? although he was drinking just like her... SO I guess only her drunkness matters and superceeds his lol Lets say that same woman drove home after ? him and hit someone.... Police breathalize her and she fails.... guess what she goin to jail with no ? given. U see how ? the logic is where the same woman who drank has no responsibility for ? the man but she does have responsibility for driving.....
yea
i don't agree that men or anyone should be penalized for having ? sex if both parties was down
with cosby though some of his accusers claim he drugged them without their consent and did things to them under the influence, when they were unconscious ....that's a different story
and yet they remember everything as if it was yesturday!!?
even though they were passed out!!?
? shut the ? up!!
lol
so if you wake half nude and hair ? up in bed with someone ....however long prior that same someone had offered you a drink of tea or whatever which you accepted the logical conclusion is? that is something you are going to remember
and you missed the part about "under the influence"...meaning conscious but under the influence of drugs -
BOSSExcellence wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The same ? that lectured ? for years and gave us the ? ? pound cake speech?
im the same ? that be lecturing my cousins and lil homies..
ur point??
u got kids?? probably not..
good!
but i got custody of one who jus turned 16 and another thats 17 and i be on these ? head about they grades and behavior in school..
maybe i should jus shut the ? up cause who am i to talk right??
If you start ? hoes...yes you should have a coke and a smile and shut the ? up
Look BossHuxtable this aint ending well for ya daddy...it just aint
cause he ? them cause they said so?!
.
No cause he said so
https://www.google.com/amp/variety.com/2015/biz/news/bill-cosby-admits-to-drugging-women-for-sex-report-1201534649/amp/
Where did it say that he drugged these women? It said that he gave them drugs. -
Out of 60 women how many did pill Cosby legitimately ? ?
-
BOSSExcellence wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The same ? that lectured ? for years and gave us the ? ? pound cake speech?
im the same ? that be lecturing my cousins and lil homies..
ur point??
u got kids?? probably not..
good!
but i got custody of one who jus turned 16 and another thats 17 and i be on these ? head about they grades and behavior in school..
maybe i should jus shut the ? up cause who am i to talk right??
If you start ? hoes...yes you should have a coke and a smile and shut the ? up
Look BossHuxtable this aint ending well for ya daddy...it just aint
cause he ? them cause they said so?!
.
No cause he said so
https://www.google.com/amp/variety.com/2015/biz/news/bill-cosby-admits-to-drugging-women-for-sex-report-1201534649/amp/
"Bill Cosby testified in 2005 that he purchased Quaaludes to give to women with the intent of having sex with them,"
my ? we know u dont get ? ..
but us real ? ..
? who prefer to ? in a standing position buy alcohol and drugs all the time and invite ? over "with the intent of having sex with them."
so im missin ur point or the part where he ? ? ?! -
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »There might be some racism behind the difference between how he is being treated vs some others, but even then, that might be a stretch.
At this point, dude is pretty much accused of being the Michael Jordan of ? , so it stands to reason he'd get more press than the other violators. There is also the fact that he actually admitted to buying Quaaludes for the purpose of sex with women.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/07/us/bill-cosby-quaaludes-sexual-assault-allegations/
Sometimes there is no conspiracy to take a ? down. Sometimes ? are just guilty.
y'know there was a time when blacks and whites couldnt marry.. let alone be together..
point bein we cant judge and condemn a man for somethin he did in a different time and era..
? willingly took them ? back in the day not to fall asleep but for the euphoric feeling...
EVERYONE WAS DOIN IT..
u dont go to no ? drug party get ? on and 50yrs later say because u were under the influence u was ? ..
? get all the way the ? outta here.
u got ? !
did this man cheat on his wife??
sure..
did he ? these ? ?? by today's standards yes.. seein as if u so much as look at a ? and think nasty thoughts witout her consent its ? ..
but it wasnt ? 50yrs ago orelse they wouldve hung his black ass..
Would you say the same thing about the "reformed" racists from the 50 years ago?
And from my understanding Quaaludes ain't like alcohol where a chick may be doing what she really wants to do anyway while under the influences. Quaaludes knock people out. So I'm not sure how you figure that a dude giving drugs to a chick and then having sex with that chick while she's unconscious or close to it is not ? .
He never had sex with unconscious women nor did he drug any woman. They both took drugs and had consensual sex.
how do you know this for sure? lol
so it's not possible that he's lying to protect himself?
So none of those women admit to willfully taking drugs? u really believe that?
maybe some did
why do you believe they are all lying?
-
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »There might be some racism behind the difference between how he is being treated vs some others, but even then, that might be a stretch.
At this point, dude is pretty much accused of being the Michael Jordan of ? , so it stands to reason he'd get more press than the other violators. There is also the fact that he actually admitted to buying Quaaludes for the purpose of sex with women.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/07/us/bill-cosby-quaaludes-sexual-assault-allegations/
Sometimes there is no conspiracy to take a ? down. Sometimes ? are just guilty.
y'know there was a time when blacks and whites couldnt marry.. let alone be together..
point bein we cant judge and condemn a man for somethin he did in a different time and era..
? willingly took them ? back in the day not to fall asleep but for the euphoric feeling...
EVERYONE WAS DOIN IT..
u dont go to no ? drug party get ? on and 50yrs later say because u were under the influence u was ? ..
? get all the way the ? outta here.
u got ? !
did this man cheat on his wife??
sure..
did he ? these ? ?? by today's standards yes.. seein as if u so much as look at a ? and think nasty thoughts witout her consent its ? ..
but it wasnt ? 50yrs ago orelse they wouldve hung his black ass..
Would you say the same thing about the "reformed" racists from the 50 years ago?
And from my understanding Quaaludes ain't like alcohol where a chick may be doing what she really wants to do anyway while under the influences. Quaaludes knock people out. So I'm not sure how you figure that a dude giving drugs to a chick and then having sex with that chick while she's unconscious or close to it is not ? .
He never had sex with unconscious women nor did he drug any woman. They both took drugs and had consensual sex.
how do you know this for sure? lol
so it's not possible that he's lying to protect himself?
So none of those women admit to willfully taking drugs? u really believe that?
maybe some did
why do you believe they are all lying?
Because some of their stories were already debunked as ? . -
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »There might be some racism behind the difference between how he is being treated vs some others, but even then, that might be a stretch.
At this point, dude is pretty much accused of being the Michael Jordan of ? , so it stands to reason he'd get more press than the other violators. There is also the fact that he actually admitted to buying Quaaludes for the purpose of sex with women.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/07/us/bill-cosby-quaaludes-sexual-assault-allegations/
Sometimes there is no conspiracy to take a ? down. Sometimes ? are just guilty.
y'know there was a time when blacks and whites couldnt marry.. let alone be together..
point bein we cant judge and condemn a man for somethin he did in a different time and era..
? willingly took them ? back in the day not to fall asleep but for the euphoric feeling...
EVERYONE WAS DOIN IT..
u dont go to no ? drug party get ? on and 50yrs later say because u were under the influence u was ? ..
? get all the way the ? outta here.
u got ? !
did this man cheat on his wife??
sure..
did he ? these ? ?? by today's standards yes.. seein as if u so much as look at a ? and think nasty thoughts witout her consent its ? ..
but it wasnt ? 50yrs ago orelse they wouldve hung his black ass..
Would you say the same thing about the "reformed" racists from the 50 years ago?
And from my understanding Quaaludes ain't like alcohol where a chick may be doing what she really wants to do anyway while under the influences. Quaaludes knock people out. So I'm not sure how you figure that a dude giving drugs to a chick and then having sex with that chick while she's unconscious or close to it is not ? .
He never had sex with unconscious women nor did he drug any woman. They both took drugs and had consensual sex.
how do you know this for sure? lol
so it's not possible that he's lying to protect himself?
So none of those women admit to willfully taking drugs? u really believe that?
maybe some did
why do you believe they are all lying?
what makes u believe they are all tellin the truth? -
5th Letter wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »There might be some racism behind the difference between how he is being treated vs some others, but even then, that might be a stretch.
At this point, dude is pretty much accused of being the Michael Jordan of ? , so it stands to reason he'd get more press than the other violators. There is also the fact that he actually admitted to buying Quaaludes for the purpose of sex with women.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/07/us/bill-cosby-quaaludes-sexual-assault-allegations/
Sometimes there is no conspiracy to take a ? down. Sometimes ? are just guilty.
y'know there was a time when blacks and whites couldnt marry.. let alone be together..
point bein we cant judge and condemn a man for somethin he did in a different time and era..
? willingly took them ? back in the day not to fall asleep but for the euphoric feeling...
EVERYONE WAS DOIN IT..
u dont go to no ? drug party get ? on and 50yrs later say because u were under the influence u was ? ..
? get all the way the ? outta here.
u got ? !
did this man cheat on his wife??
sure..
did he ? these ? ?? by today's standards yes.. seein as if u so much as look at a ? and think nasty thoughts witout her consent its ? ..
but it wasnt ? 50yrs ago orelse they wouldve hung his black ass..
Would you say the same thing about the "reformed" racists from the 50 years ago?
And from my understanding Quaaludes ain't like alcohol where a chick may be doing what she really wants to do anyway while under the influences. Quaaludes knock people out. So I'm not sure how you figure that a dude giving drugs to a chick and then having sex with that chick while she's unconscious or close to it is not ? .
He never had sex with unconscious women nor did he drug any woman. They both took drugs and had consensual sex.
how do you know this for sure? lol
so it's not possible that he's lying to protect himself?
So none of those women admit to willfully taking drugs? u really believe that?
maybe some did
why do you believe they are all lying?
Because some of their stories were already debunked as ? .
receipts?
regardless if one woman lies, that means they are all lying? -
Edit seriously though in my mind if Felicia Rashaad don't believe I don't either
-
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »There might be some racism behind the difference between how he is being treated vs some others, but even then, that might be a stretch.
At this point, dude is pretty much accused of being the Michael Jordan of ? , so it stands to reason he'd get more press than the other violators. There is also the fact that he actually admitted to buying Quaaludes for the purpose of sex with women.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/07/us/bill-cosby-quaaludes-sexual-assault-allegations/
Sometimes there is no conspiracy to take a ? down. Sometimes ? are just guilty.
y'know there was a time when blacks and whites couldnt marry.. let alone be together..
point bein we cant judge and condemn a man for somethin he did in a different time and era..
? willingly took them ? back in the day not to fall asleep but for the euphoric feeling...
EVERYONE WAS DOIN IT..
u dont go to no ? drug party get ? on and 50yrs later say because u were under the influence u was ? ..
? get all the way the ? outta here.
u got ? !
did this man cheat on his wife??
sure..
did he ? these ? ?? by today's standards yes.. seein as if u so much as look at a ? and think nasty thoughts witout her consent its ? ..
but it wasnt ? 50yrs ago orelse they wouldve hung his black ass..
Would you say the same thing about the "reformed" racists from the 50 years ago?
And from my understanding Quaaludes ain't like alcohol where a chick may be doing what she really wants to do anyway while under the influences. Quaaludes knock people out. So I'm not sure how you figure that a dude giving drugs to a chick and then having sex with that chick while she's unconscious or close to it is not ? .
He never had sex with unconscious women nor did he drug any woman. They both took drugs and had consensual sex.
how do you know this for sure? lol
so it's not possible that he's lying to protect himself?
So none of those women admit to willfully taking drugs? u really believe that?
maybe some did
why do you believe they are all lying?
Because some of their stories were already debunked as ? .
receipts?
regardless if one woman lies, that means they are all lying?
http://m.tmz.com/#article/2016/01/06/bill-cosby-da-rejects-case-sexual-assault/
that was jus a quick google..
there's others but i aint even about to go there..
since u refuse to use common sense and logic do ur own due diligence.. -
#FreeBill
#HoesGonBeHoes
#TheyJustHateAdmittingToIt -
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »There might be some racism behind the difference between how he is being treated vs some others, but even then, that might be a stretch.
At this point, dude is pretty much accused of being the Michael Jordan of ? , so it stands to reason he'd get more press than the other violators. There is also the fact that he actually admitted to buying Quaaludes for the purpose of sex with women.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/07/us/bill-cosby-quaaludes-sexual-assault-allegations/
Sometimes there is no conspiracy to take a ? down. Sometimes ? are just guilty.
y'know there was a time when blacks and whites couldnt marry.. let alone be together..
point bein we cant judge and condemn a man for somethin he did in a different time and era..
? willingly took them ? back in the day not to fall asleep but for the euphoric feeling...
EVERYONE WAS DOIN IT..
u dont go to no ? drug party get ? on and 50yrs later say because u were under the influence u was ? ..
? get all the way the ? outta here.
u got ? !
did this man cheat on his wife??
sure..
did he ? these ? ?? by today's standards yes.. seein as if u so much as look at a ? and think nasty thoughts witout her consent its ? ..
but it wasnt ? 50yrs ago orelse they wouldve hung his black ass..
Would you say the same thing about the "reformed" racists from the 50 years ago?
And from my understanding Quaaludes ain't like alcohol where a chick may be doing what she really wants to do anyway while under the influences. Quaaludes knock people out. So I'm not sure how you figure that a dude giving drugs to a chick and then having sex with that chick while she's unconscious or close to it is not ? .
He never had sex with unconscious women nor did he drug any woman. They both took drugs and had consensual sex.
how do you know this for sure? lol
so it's not possible that he's lying to protect himself?
So none of those women admit to willfully taking drugs? u really believe that?
maybe some did
why do you believe they are all lying?
Initially I was like its too may he prolly ? some.... But then mu nigganess took over and logic kicked in. He ? them and he was a perv with no ? given Ie a rich man having rich man spoils. They came over his house and did drugs with him He aint need to ? them. I could be wrong... Plus karma is invovled for how he talked down at ? .. But with that said he get my benefit of the doubt kanye shrug... -
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »There might be some racism behind the difference between how he is being treated vs some others, but even then, that might be a stretch.
At this point, dude is pretty much accused of being the Michael Jordan of ? , so it stands to reason he'd get more press than the other violators. There is also the fact that he actually admitted to buying Quaaludes for the purpose of sex with women.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/07/us/bill-cosby-quaaludes-sexual-assault-allegations/
Sometimes there is no conspiracy to take a ? down. Sometimes ? are just guilty.
y'know there was a time when blacks and whites couldnt marry.. let alone be together..
point bein we cant judge and condemn a man for somethin he did in a different time and era..
? willingly took them ? back in the day not to fall asleep but for the euphoric feeling...
EVERYONE WAS DOIN IT..
u dont go to no ? drug party get ? on and 50yrs later say because u were under the influence u was ? ..
? get all the way the ? outta here.
u got ? !
did this man cheat on his wife??
sure..
did he ? these ? ?? by today's standards yes.. seein as if u so much as look at a ? and think nasty thoughts witout her consent its ? ..
but it wasnt ? 50yrs ago orelse they wouldve hung his black ass..
Would you say the same thing about the "reformed" racists from the 50 years ago?
And from my understanding Quaaludes ain't like alcohol where a chick may be doing what she really wants to do anyway while under the influences. Quaaludes knock people out. So I'm not sure how you figure that a dude giving drugs to a chick and then having sex with that chick while she's unconscious or close to it is not ? .
He never had sex with unconscious women nor did he drug any woman. They both took drugs and had consensual sex.
how do you know this for sure? lol
so it's not possible that he's lying to protect himself?
So none of those women admit to willfully taking drugs? u really believe that?
maybe some did
why do you believe they are all lying?
Because some of their stories were already debunked as ? .
receipts?
regardless if one woman lies, that means they are all lying?
Boss just posted one of many examples.
Lying Cosby drugging women? Well it's innocent until proven guilty. -
BOSSExcellence wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »There might be some racism behind the difference between how he is being treated vs some others, but even then, that might be a stretch.
At this point, dude is pretty much accused of being the Michael Jordan of ? , so it stands to reason he'd get more press than the other violators. There is also the fact that he actually admitted to buying Quaaludes for the purpose of sex with women.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/07/us/bill-cosby-quaaludes-sexual-assault-allegations/
Sometimes there is no conspiracy to take a ? down. Sometimes ? are just guilty.
y'know there was a time when blacks and whites couldnt marry.. let alone be together..
point bein we cant judge and condemn a man for somethin he did in a different time and era..
? willingly took them ? back in the day not to fall asleep but for the euphoric feeling...
EVERYONE WAS DOIN IT..
u dont go to no ? drug party get ? on and 50yrs later say because u were under the influence u was ? ..
? get all the way the ? outta here.
u got ? !
did this man cheat on his wife??
sure..
did he ? these ? ?? by today's standards yes.. seein as if u so much as look at a ? and think nasty thoughts witout her consent its ? ..
but it wasnt ? 50yrs ago orelse they wouldve hung his black ass..
Would you say the same thing about the "reformed" racists from the 50 years ago?
And from my understanding Quaaludes ain't like alcohol where a chick may be doing what she really wants to do anyway while under the influences. Quaaludes knock people out. So I'm not sure how you figure that a dude giving drugs to a chick and then having sex with that chick while she's unconscious or close to it is not ? .
He never had sex with unconscious women nor did he drug any woman. They both took drugs and had consensual sex.
how do you know this for sure? lol
so it's not possible that he's lying to protect himself?
So none of those women admit to willfully taking drugs? u really believe that?
maybe some did
why do you believe they are all lying?
what makes u believe they are all tellin the truth?
never said they were all telling the truth
but i do believe that he may have taken advantaged and possibly ? more than a few of the accusers because...
1. he used to joke around when he was younger a lot about slipping drugs into women's drinks without them knowing
2. his admission about getting drugs for “young women that he wanted to have sex with"
3. his willingness to give women money or educational trust funds when they accused him of ? , sexual assault
4. beverly johnson's story -
Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »Madame_CJSkywalker wrote: »5th Letter wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The Lonious Monk wrote: »There might be some racism behind the difference between how he is being treated vs some others, but even then, that might be a stretch.
At this point, dude is pretty much accused of being the Michael Jordan of ? , so it stands to reason he'd get more press than the other violators. There is also the fact that he actually admitted to buying Quaaludes for the purpose of sex with women.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/07/us/bill-cosby-quaaludes-sexual-assault-allegations/
Sometimes there is no conspiracy to take a ? down. Sometimes ? are just guilty.
y'know there was a time when blacks and whites couldnt marry.. let alone be together..
point bein we cant judge and condemn a man for somethin he did in a different time and era..
? willingly took them ? back in the day not to fall asleep but for the euphoric feeling...
EVERYONE WAS DOIN IT..
u dont go to no ? drug party get ? on and 50yrs later say because u were under the influence u was ? ..
? get all the way the ? outta here.
u got ? !
did this man cheat on his wife??
sure..
did he ? these ? ?? by today's standards yes.. seein as if u so much as look at a ? and think nasty thoughts witout her consent its ? ..
but it wasnt ? 50yrs ago orelse they wouldve hung his black ass..
Would you say the same thing about the "reformed" racists from the 50 years ago?
And from my understanding Quaaludes ain't like alcohol where a chick may be doing what she really wants to do anyway while under the influences. Quaaludes knock people out. So I'm not sure how you figure that a dude giving drugs to a chick and then having sex with that chick while she's unconscious or close to it is not ? .
He never had sex with unconscious women nor did he drug any woman. They both took drugs and had consensual sex.
how do you know this for sure? lol
so it's not possible that he's lying to protect himself?
So none of those women admit to willfully taking drugs? u really believe that?
maybe some did
why do you believe they are all lying?
what makes u believe they are all tellin the truth?
never said they were all telling the truth
but i do believe that he may have taken advantaged and possibly ? more than a few of the accusers because...
1. he used to joke around when he was younger a lot about slipping drugs into women's drinks without them knowing
2. his admission about getting drugs for “young women that he wanted to have sex with"
3. his willingness to give women money or educational trust funds when they accused him of ? , sexual assault
4. beverly johnson's story
didnt read all that ? ..
but how bout this tho??!
until u know which one for sure who's tellin the truth..
FACTS not OPINIONS..
shut the ? up.. -
5th Letter wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »BOSSExcellence wrote: »The same ? that lectured ? for years and gave us the ? ? pound cake speech?
im the same ? that be lecturing my cousins and lil homies..
ur point??
u got kids?? probably not..
good!
but i got custody of one who jus turned 16 and another thats 17 and i be on these ? head about they grades and behavior in school..
maybe i should jus shut the ? up cause who am i to talk right??
If you start ? hoes...yes you should have a coke and a smile and shut the ? up
Look BossHuxtable this aint ending well for ya daddy...it just aint
cause he ? them cause they said so?!
.
No cause he said so
https://www.google.com/amp/variety.com/2015/biz/news/bill-cosby-admits-to-drugging-women-for-sex-report-1201534649/amp/
Where did it say that he drugged these women? It said that he gave them drugs.
Wtf do you do when you drug somebody?
Dont give'em drugs?
How many of the 60 you think he ? ? -